On the Social Legacy of B.F. Skinner: Rhetoric of Change, Philosophy of Adjustment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The legacy of B.F. Skinner for social improvement is examined. A significant discrepancy is noticed between the rhetoric of change contained in his writings and the underlying philosophy of adjustment to the social order. Promises to modify the environment to advance human welfare were reverted into practices of changing individuals to promote the effective functioning of the social system. A critique of Skinner's theory of values reveals that it is unable to provide a conceptual framework for the ‘good’ society. It is argued that even though radical behaviorism is frequently used to maintain undesirable social institutions, it could be employed to foster beneficial macrosocial changes. This contrast is analyzed in terms of (a) a discrepancy between theory and practice; (b) a preoccupation with technology over ethical decision-making; and (c) a neglect of power issues in institutional and societal settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-137
Number of pages13
JournalTheory and Psychology
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Behaviorism
Social Adjustment
Decision Making
Technology
Power (Psychology)
B. F. Skinner
Philosophy
Rhetoric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

On the Social Legacy of B.F. Skinner : Rhetoric of Change, Philosophy of Adjustment. / Prilleltensky, Isaac.

In: Theory and Psychology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1994, p. 125-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a6f829703e744100a471ee72134da3d3,
title = "On the Social Legacy of B.F. Skinner: Rhetoric of Change, Philosophy of Adjustment",
abstract = "The legacy of B.F. Skinner for social improvement is examined. A significant discrepancy is noticed between the rhetoric of change contained in his writings and the underlying philosophy of adjustment to the social order. Promises to modify the environment to advance human welfare were reverted into practices of changing individuals to promote the effective functioning of the social system. A critique of Skinner's theory of values reveals that it is unable to provide a conceptual framework for the ‘good’ society. It is argued that even though radical behaviorism is frequently used to maintain undesirable social institutions, it could be employed to foster beneficial macrosocial changes. This contrast is analyzed in terms of (a) a discrepancy between theory and practice; (b) a preoccupation with technology over ethical decision-making; and (c) a neglect of power issues in institutional and societal settings.",
author = "Isaac Prilleltensky",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1177/0959354394041006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "125--137",
journal = "Theory and Psychology",
issn = "0959-3543",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Social Legacy of B.F. Skinner

T2 - Rhetoric of Change, Philosophy of Adjustment

AU - Prilleltensky, Isaac

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - The legacy of B.F. Skinner for social improvement is examined. A significant discrepancy is noticed between the rhetoric of change contained in his writings and the underlying philosophy of adjustment to the social order. Promises to modify the environment to advance human welfare were reverted into practices of changing individuals to promote the effective functioning of the social system. A critique of Skinner's theory of values reveals that it is unable to provide a conceptual framework for the ‘good’ society. It is argued that even though radical behaviorism is frequently used to maintain undesirable social institutions, it could be employed to foster beneficial macrosocial changes. This contrast is analyzed in terms of (a) a discrepancy between theory and practice; (b) a preoccupation with technology over ethical decision-making; and (c) a neglect of power issues in institutional and societal settings.

AB - The legacy of B.F. Skinner for social improvement is examined. A significant discrepancy is noticed between the rhetoric of change contained in his writings and the underlying philosophy of adjustment to the social order. Promises to modify the environment to advance human welfare were reverted into practices of changing individuals to promote the effective functioning of the social system. A critique of Skinner's theory of values reveals that it is unable to provide a conceptual framework for the ‘good’ society. It is argued that even though radical behaviorism is frequently used to maintain undesirable social institutions, it could be employed to foster beneficial macrosocial changes. This contrast is analyzed in terms of (a) a discrepancy between theory and practice; (b) a preoccupation with technology over ethical decision-making; and (c) a neglect of power issues in institutional and societal settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970416841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970416841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0959354394041006

DO - 10.1177/0959354394041006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970416841

VL - 4

SP - 125

EP - 137

JO - Theory and Psychology

JF - Theory and Psychology

SN - 0959-3543

IS - 1

ER -