On the Relationship Between Belief and Acceptance of Evolution as Goals of Evolution Education: Twelve Years Later

Mike U. Smith, Harvey Siegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The issue of the proper goals of science education and science teacher education have been a focus of the science education and philosophy of science communities in recent years. More particularly, the issue of whether belief/acceptance of evolution and/or understanding are the appropriate goals for evolution educators and the issue of the precise nature of the distinctions among the terms knowledge, understanding, belief, and acceptance have received increasing attention in the 12 years since we first published our views on these subjects. During that time, our own views about these issues have evolved, and this article presents a reconsideration of both these distinctions and the propriety of these goals. In particular, the present paper continues our discussion of the nature of belief as it relates to science education, and more specifically to evolution education. We extend that work to consider the import of the distinction between belief and acceptance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)473-496
Number of pages24
JournalScience and Education
Volume25
Issue number5-6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

acceptance
education
science
philosophy of science
import
educator
teacher
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

On the Relationship Between Belief and Acceptance of Evolution as Goals of Evolution Education : Twelve Years Later. / Smith, Mike U.; Siegel, Harvey.

In: Science and Education, Vol. 25, No. 5-6, 01.08.2016, p. 473-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5c2a35d8c1644ec5898dd7b4544944b6,
title = "On the Relationship Between Belief and Acceptance of Evolution as Goals of Evolution Education: Twelve Years Later",
abstract = "The issue of the proper goals of science education and science teacher education have been a focus of the science education and philosophy of science communities in recent years. More particularly, the issue of whether belief/acceptance of evolution and/or understanding are the appropriate goals for evolution educators and the issue of the precise nature of the distinctions among the terms knowledge, understanding, belief, and acceptance have received increasing attention in the 12 years since we first published our views on these subjects. During that time, our own views about these issues have evolved, and this article presents a reconsideration of both these distinctions and the propriety of these goals. In particular, the present paper continues our discussion of the nature of belief as it relates to science education, and more specifically to evolution education. We extend that work to consider the import of the distinction between belief and acceptance.",
author = "Smith, {Mike U.} and Harvey Siegel",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11191-016-9836-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "473--496",
journal = "Science and Education",
issn = "0926-7220",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Relationship Between Belief and Acceptance of Evolution as Goals of Evolution Education

T2 - Twelve Years Later

AU - Smith, Mike U.

AU - Siegel, Harvey

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - The issue of the proper goals of science education and science teacher education have been a focus of the science education and philosophy of science communities in recent years. More particularly, the issue of whether belief/acceptance of evolution and/or understanding are the appropriate goals for evolution educators and the issue of the precise nature of the distinctions among the terms knowledge, understanding, belief, and acceptance have received increasing attention in the 12 years since we first published our views on these subjects. During that time, our own views about these issues have evolved, and this article presents a reconsideration of both these distinctions and the propriety of these goals. In particular, the present paper continues our discussion of the nature of belief as it relates to science education, and more specifically to evolution education. We extend that work to consider the import of the distinction between belief and acceptance.

AB - The issue of the proper goals of science education and science teacher education have been a focus of the science education and philosophy of science communities in recent years. More particularly, the issue of whether belief/acceptance of evolution and/or understanding are the appropriate goals for evolution educators and the issue of the precise nature of the distinctions among the terms knowledge, understanding, belief, and acceptance have received increasing attention in the 12 years since we first published our views on these subjects. During that time, our own views about these issues have evolved, and this article presents a reconsideration of both these distinctions and the propriety of these goals. In particular, the present paper continues our discussion of the nature of belief as it relates to science education, and more specifically to evolution education. We extend that work to consider the import of the distinction between belief and acceptance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976449639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976449639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11191-016-9836-4

DO - 10.1007/s11191-016-9836-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84976449639

VL - 25

SP - 473

EP - 496

JO - Science and Education

JF - Science and Education

SN - 0926-7220

IS - 5-6

ER -