On the nature of the frontal zone of the Choctawhatchee Bay plume in the Gulf of Mexico

K. D. Huguenard, D. J. Bogucki, D. G. Ortiz-Suslow, N. J M Laxague, J. H. Macmahan, Tamay M Ozgokmen, Brian K Haus, A. J H M Reniers, J. Hargrove, A. V. Soloviev, Hans C Graber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

River plumes often feature turbulent processes in the frontal zone and interfacial region at base of the plume, which ultimately impact spreading and mixing rates with the ambient coastal ocean. The degree to which these processes govern overall plume mixing is yet to be quantified with microstructure observations. A field campaign was conducted in a river plume in the northeast Gulf of Mexico in December 2013, in order to assess mixing processes that could potentially impact transport and dispersion of surface material near coastal regions. Current velocity, density, and Turbulent Kinetic Energy Values, ε, were obtained using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP), a Conductivity Temperature Depth (CTD) profiler, a Vertical Microstructure Profiler (VMP), and two Acoustic Doppler Velocimeters (ADVs). The frontal region contained ε values on the order of 10-5 m2 s-3, which were markedly larger than in the ambient water beneath (O 10-9 m2 s-3). An energetic wake of moderate ε values (O 10-6 m2 s-3) was observed trailing the frontal edge. The interfacial region of an interior section of the plume featured opposing horizontal velocities and a ε value on the order of 10-6 m2 s-3. A simplified mixing budget was used under significant assumptions to compare contributions from wind, tides, and frontal regions of the plume. The results from this order of magnitude analysis indicated that frontal processes (59%) dominated in overall mixing. This emphasizes the importance of adequate parameterization of river plume frontal processes in coastal predictive models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Gulf of Mexico
plumes
plume
river plume
Rivers
profiler
rivers
microstructure
Acoustics
Velocimeters
Microstructure
Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler
current velocity
Tides
Parameterization
Kinetic energy
kinetic energy
acoustics
parameterization
tide

Keywords

  • Frontal zone
  • Mixing
  • River plume
  • TKE dissipation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Geophysics
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Oceanography

Cite this

On the nature of the frontal zone of the Choctawhatchee Bay plume in the Gulf of Mexico. / Huguenard, K. D.; Bogucki, D. J.; Ortiz-Suslow, D. G.; Laxague, N. J M; Macmahan, J. H.; Ozgokmen, Tamay M; Haus, Brian K; Reniers, A. J H M; Hargrove, J.; Soloviev, A. V.; Graber, Hans C.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huguenard, K. D. ; Bogucki, D. J. ; Ortiz-Suslow, D. G. ; Laxague, N. J M ; Macmahan, J. H. ; Ozgokmen, Tamay M ; Haus, Brian K ; Reniers, A. J H M ; Hargrove, J. ; Soloviev, A. V. ; Graber, Hans C. / On the nature of the frontal zone of the Choctawhatchee Bay plume in the Gulf of Mexico. In: Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans. 2016.
@article{2449dd70255d488abc9c9baea50f5606,
title = "On the nature of the frontal zone of the Choctawhatchee Bay plume in the Gulf of Mexico",
abstract = "River plumes often feature turbulent processes in the frontal zone and interfacial region at base of the plume, which ultimately impact spreading and mixing rates with the ambient coastal ocean. The degree to which these processes govern overall plume mixing is yet to be quantified with microstructure observations. A field campaign was conducted in a river plume in the northeast Gulf of Mexico in December 2013, in order to assess mixing processes that could potentially impact transport and dispersion of surface material near coastal regions. Current velocity, density, and Turbulent Kinetic Energy Values, ε, were obtained using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP), a Conductivity Temperature Depth (CTD) profiler, a Vertical Microstructure Profiler (VMP), and two Acoustic Doppler Velocimeters (ADVs). The frontal region contained ε values on the order of 10-5 m2 s-3, which were markedly larger than in the ambient water beneath (O 10-9 m2 s-3). An energetic wake of moderate ε values (O 10-6 m2 s-3) was observed trailing the frontal edge. The interfacial region of an interior section of the plume featured opposing horizontal velocities and a ε value on the order of 10-6 m2 s-3. A simplified mixing budget was used under significant assumptions to compare contributions from wind, tides, and frontal regions of the plume. The results from this order of magnitude analysis indicated that frontal processes (59{\%}) dominated in overall mixing. This emphasizes the importance of adequate parameterization of river plume frontal processes in coastal predictive models.",
keywords = "Frontal zone, Mixing, River plume, TKE dissipation",
author = "Huguenard, {K. D.} and Bogucki, {D. J.} and Ortiz-Suslow, {D. G.} and Laxague, {N. J M} and Macmahan, {J. H.} and Ozgokmen, {Tamay M} and Haus, {Brian K} and Reniers, {A. J H M} and J. Hargrove and Soloviev, {A. V.} and Graber, {Hans C}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/2015JC010988",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans",
issn = "2169-9275",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the nature of the frontal zone of the Choctawhatchee Bay plume in the Gulf of Mexico

AU - Huguenard, K. D.

AU - Bogucki, D. J.

AU - Ortiz-Suslow, D. G.

AU - Laxague, N. J M

AU - Macmahan, J. H.

AU - Ozgokmen, Tamay M

AU - Haus, Brian K

AU - Reniers, A. J H M

AU - Hargrove, J.

AU - Soloviev, A. V.

AU - Graber, Hans C

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - River plumes often feature turbulent processes in the frontal zone and interfacial region at base of the plume, which ultimately impact spreading and mixing rates with the ambient coastal ocean. The degree to which these processes govern overall plume mixing is yet to be quantified with microstructure observations. A field campaign was conducted in a river plume in the northeast Gulf of Mexico in December 2013, in order to assess mixing processes that could potentially impact transport and dispersion of surface material near coastal regions. Current velocity, density, and Turbulent Kinetic Energy Values, ε, were obtained using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP), a Conductivity Temperature Depth (CTD) profiler, a Vertical Microstructure Profiler (VMP), and two Acoustic Doppler Velocimeters (ADVs). The frontal region contained ε values on the order of 10-5 m2 s-3, which were markedly larger than in the ambient water beneath (O 10-9 m2 s-3). An energetic wake of moderate ε values (O 10-6 m2 s-3) was observed trailing the frontal edge. The interfacial region of an interior section of the plume featured opposing horizontal velocities and a ε value on the order of 10-6 m2 s-3. A simplified mixing budget was used under significant assumptions to compare contributions from wind, tides, and frontal regions of the plume. The results from this order of magnitude analysis indicated that frontal processes (59%) dominated in overall mixing. This emphasizes the importance of adequate parameterization of river plume frontal processes in coastal predictive models.

AB - River plumes often feature turbulent processes in the frontal zone and interfacial region at base of the plume, which ultimately impact spreading and mixing rates with the ambient coastal ocean. The degree to which these processes govern overall plume mixing is yet to be quantified with microstructure observations. A field campaign was conducted in a river plume in the northeast Gulf of Mexico in December 2013, in order to assess mixing processes that could potentially impact transport and dispersion of surface material near coastal regions. Current velocity, density, and Turbulent Kinetic Energy Values, ε, were obtained using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP), a Conductivity Temperature Depth (CTD) profiler, a Vertical Microstructure Profiler (VMP), and two Acoustic Doppler Velocimeters (ADVs). The frontal region contained ε values on the order of 10-5 m2 s-3, which were markedly larger than in the ambient water beneath (O 10-9 m2 s-3). An energetic wake of moderate ε values (O 10-6 m2 s-3) was observed trailing the frontal edge. The interfacial region of an interior section of the plume featured opposing horizontal velocities and a ε value on the order of 10-6 m2 s-3. A simplified mixing budget was used under significant assumptions to compare contributions from wind, tides, and frontal regions of the plume. The results from this order of magnitude analysis indicated that frontal processes (59%) dominated in overall mixing. This emphasizes the importance of adequate parameterization of river plume frontal processes in coastal predictive models.

KW - Frontal zone

KW - Mixing

KW - River plume

KW - TKE dissipation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959159791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959159791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2015JC010988

DO - 10.1002/2015JC010988

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

SN - 2169-9275

ER -