On the limits of estimating the maximum wind speeds in hurricanes

David S. Nolan, Jun A. Zhang, Eric W. Uhlhorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations


This study uses an observing system simulation experiment (OSSE) approach to test the limitations of even nearly ideal observing systems to capture the peak wind speed occurring within a tropical storm or hurricane. The dataset is provided by a 1-km resolution simulation of an Atlantic hurricane with surface wind speeds saved every 10 s. An optimal observing system consisting of a dense field of anemometers provides perfect measurements of the peak 1-min wind speed as well as the average peak wind speed. Suboptimal observing systems consisting of a small number of anemometers are sampled and compared to the truth provided by the optimal observing system. Results show that a single, perfect anemometer experiencing a direct hit by the right side of the eyewall will underestimate the actual peak intensity by 10%-20%. Even an unusually large number of anemometers (e.g., 3-5) experiencing direct hits by the storm together will underestimate the peak wind speeds by 5%-10%. However, the peak winds of just one or two anemometers will provide on average a good estimate of the average peak intensity over several hours. Enhancing the variability of the simulated winds to better match observed winds does not change the results. Adding observational errors generally increases the reported peak winds, thus reducing the underestimates. If the average underestimate (negative bias) were known perfectly for each case, it could be used to correct the wind speeds, leaving only mean absolute errors of 3%-5%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2814-2837
Number of pages24
JournalMonthly Weather Review
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science


Dive into the research topics of 'On the limits of estimating the maximum wind speeds in hurricanes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this