TY - JOUR
T1 - Observed kinematic and thermodynamic structure in the hurricane boundary layer during intensity change
AU - Ahern, Kyle
AU - Bourassa, Mark A.
AU - Hart, Robert E.
AU - Zhang, Jun A.
AU - Rogers, Robert F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments. The authors acknowledge and thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism and recommendations that clarified and reinforced the direction and findings of this manuscript. We are grateful for comments and advice from the scientists at the Hurricane Research Division (HRD), which helped refine this work. This study also necessitated a large amount of data provided generously by HRD. Kyle Ahern was funded by NASA/JPL Contract 1419699, NGI Award 191001-363513.01C (NOAA Prime NA16OAR4320199), and NOAA Award NA17OAR4310153. Jun Zhang was supported by NSF Grants AGS1822128 and AGS1654831, and NOAA Grant NA14NWS4680030.
Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge and thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism and recommendations that clarified and reinforced the direction and findings of this manuscript. We are grateful for comments and advice from the scientists at the Hurricane Research Division (HRD), which helped refine this work. This study also necessitated a large amount of data provided generously by HRD. Kyle Ahern was funded by NASA/JPL Contract 1419699, NGI Award 191001-363513.01C (NOAA Prime NA16OAR4320199), and NOAA Award NA17OAR4310153. Jun Zhang was supported by NSF Grants AGS1822128 and AGS1654831, and NOAA Grant NA14NWS4680030.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Meteorological Society.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The axisymmetric structure of the inner-core hurricane boundary layer (BL) during intensification [IN; intensity tendency $20 kt (24 h)-1, where 1 kt ≈ 0.5144 m s-1], weakening [WE; intensity tendency <-10 kt (24 h)-1], and steady-state [SS; the remainder] periods are analyzed using composites of GPS dropwindsondes from reconnaissance missions between 1998 and 2015. A total of 3091 dropsondes were composited for analysis below 2.5-km elevation—1086 during IN, 1042 during WE, and 963 during SS. In nonintensifying hurricanes, the low-level tangential wind is greater outside the radius of maximum wind (RMW) than for intensifying hurricanes, implying higher inertial stability (I2) at those radii for nonintensifying hurricanes. Differences in tangential wind structure (and I2) between the groups also imply differences in secondary circulation. The IN radial inflow layer is of nearly equal or greater thickness than nonintensifying groups, and all groups show an inflow maximum just outside the RMW. Nonintensifying hurricanes have stronger inflow outside the eyewall region, likely associated with frictionally forced ascent out of the BL and enhanced subsidence into the BL at radii outside the RMW. Equivalent potential temperatures (ue) and conditional stability are highest inside the RMW of nonintensifying storms, which is potentially related to TC intensity. At greater radii, inflow layer ue is lowest in WE hurricanes, suggesting greater subsidence or more convective downdrafts at those radii compared to IN and SS hurricanes. Comparisons of prior observational and theoretical studies are highlighted, especially those relating BL structure to large-scale vortex structure, convection, and intensity.
AB - The axisymmetric structure of the inner-core hurricane boundary layer (BL) during intensification [IN; intensity tendency $20 kt (24 h)-1, where 1 kt ≈ 0.5144 m s-1], weakening [WE; intensity tendency <-10 kt (24 h)-1], and steady-state [SS; the remainder] periods are analyzed using composites of GPS dropwindsondes from reconnaissance missions between 1998 and 2015. A total of 3091 dropsondes were composited for analysis below 2.5-km elevation—1086 during IN, 1042 during WE, and 963 during SS. In nonintensifying hurricanes, the low-level tangential wind is greater outside the radius of maximum wind (RMW) than for intensifying hurricanes, implying higher inertial stability (I2) at those radii for nonintensifying hurricanes. Differences in tangential wind structure (and I2) between the groups also imply differences in secondary circulation. The IN radial inflow layer is of nearly equal or greater thickness than nonintensifying groups, and all groups show an inflow maximum just outside the RMW. Nonintensifying hurricanes have stronger inflow outside the eyewall region, likely associated with frictionally forced ascent out of the BL and enhanced subsidence into the BL at radii outside the RMW. Equivalent potential temperatures (ue) and conditional stability are highest inside the RMW of nonintensifying storms, which is potentially related to TC intensity. At greater radii, inflow layer ue is lowest in WE hurricanes, suggesting greater subsidence or more convective downdrafts at those radii compared to IN and SS hurricanes. Comparisons of prior observational and theoretical studies are highlighted, especially those relating BL structure to large-scale vortex structure, convection, and intensity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075564060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075564060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0380.1
DO - 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0380.1
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85075564060
VL - 147
SP - 2765
EP - 2785
JO - Monthly Weather Review
JF - Monthly Weather Review
SN - 0027-0644
IS - 8
ER -