“O amherst, where is thy shame?”: Republican opposition to federalist policies in a New England town

Susan J. Siggelakis, Nicholas Mignanelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of Federalist Party policies in the small New Hampshire town of Amherst during the last two years of the eighteenth century. Drawing upon local histories and primary sources, including private letters and local newspaper archives, the authors portray a town rent by internal divisions of party, religion, and lifestyle. Their conflicts are set within the larger context of American national politics and the diverse voices throughout the states, concerned about the direction of the new republic. Key local actors in the struggle to petition the United States Congress over the Alien, Sedition, and Direct Tax Acts are described, along with their various interactions. Satiric poetry is shown as one important way in which partisans attacked one another through the press, in addition to threats and rumor-mongering. Yet, cogent arguments about political power are also present in these interactions, attesting to an engaged citizenry that is invested in this new representative democracy during the perilous last years of the century. This paper concludes with a description of how the tension among two different groups of partisans, Federalist and Republicans, led to the official splintering of one town into two, with the more strongly Republican section emerging as the new town of Mont Vernon.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)360-393
Number of pages34
JournalAmerican Journal of Legal History
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

shame
opposition
town
direct taxes
national politics
representative democracy
rumor
petition
interaction
political power
rent
eighteenth century
poetry
republic
newspaper
Religion
act
threat
Republican
Shame

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Law

Cite this

“O amherst, where is thy shame?” : Republican opposition to federalist policies in a New England town. / Siggelakis, Susan J.; Mignanelli, Nicholas.

In: American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 58, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 360-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c2f5ee8cdf2b4305b9c32c1b63f2bece,
title = "“O amherst, where is thy shame?”: Republican opposition to federalist policies in a New England town",
abstract = "This paper examines the impact of Federalist Party policies in the small New Hampshire town of Amherst during the last two years of the eighteenth century. Drawing upon local histories and primary sources, including private letters and local newspaper archives, the authors portray a town rent by internal divisions of party, religion, and lifestyle. Their conflicts are set within the larger context of American national politics and the diverse voices throughout the states, concerned about the direction of the new republic. Key local actors in the struggle to petition the United States Congress over the Alien, Sedition, and Direct Tax Acts are described, along with their various interactions. Satiric poetry is shown as one important way in which partisans attacked one another through the press, in addition to threats and rumor-mongering. Yet, cogent arguments about political power are also present in these interactions, attesting to an engaged citizenry that is invested in this new representative democracy during the perilous last years of the century. This paper concludes with a description of how the tension among two different groups of partisans, Federalist and Republicans, led to the official splintering of one town into two, with the more strongly Republican section emerging as the new town of Mont Vernon.",
author = "Siggelakis, {Susan J.} and Nicholas Mignanelli",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ajlh/njy011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "360--393",
journal = "American Journal of Legal History",
issn = "0002-9319",
publisher = "Temple University",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “O amherst, where is thy shame?”

T2 - Republican opposition to federalist policies in a New England town

AU - Siggelakis, Susan J.

AU - Mignanelli, Nicholas

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This paper examines the impact of Federalist Party policies in the small New Hampshire town of Amherst during the last two years of the eighteenth century. Drawing upon local histories and primary sources, including private letters and local newspaper archives, the authors portray a town rent by internal divisions of party, religion, and lifestyle. Their conflicts are set within the larger context of American national politics and the diverse voices throughout the states, concerned about the direction of the new republic. Key local actors in the struggle to petition the United States Congress over the Alien, Sedition, and Direct Tax Acts are described, along with their various interactions. Satiric poetry is shown as one important way in which partisans attacked one another through the press, in addition to threats and rumor-mongering. Yet, cogent arguments about political power are also present in these interactions, attesting to an engaged citizenry that is invested in this new representative democracy during the perilous last years of the century. This paper concludes with a description of how the tension among two different groups of partisans, Federalist and Republicans, led to the official splintering of one town into two, with the more strongly Republican section emerging as the new town of Mont Vernon.

AB - This paper examines the impact of Federalist Party policies in the small New Hampshire town of Amherst during the last two years of the eighteenth century. Drawing upon local histories and primary sources, including private letters and local newspaper archives, the authors portray a town rent by internal divisions of party, religion, and lifestyle. Their conflicts are set within the larger context of American national politics and the diverse voices throughout the states, concerned about the direction of the new republic. Key local actors in the struggle to petition the United States Congress over the Alien, Sedition, and Direct Tax Acts are described, along with their various interactions. Satiric poetry is shown as one important way in which partisans attacked one another through the press, in addition to threats and rumor-mongering. Yet, cogent arguments about political power are also present in these interactions, attesting to an engaged citizenry that is invested in this new representative democracy during the perilous last years of the century. This paper concludes with a description of how the tension among two different groups of partisans, Federalist and Republicans, led to the official splintering of one town into two, with the more strongly Republican section emerging as the new town of Mont Vernon.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061807935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061807935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ajlh/njy011

DO - 10.1093/ajlh/njy011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061807935

VL - 58

SP - 360

EP - 393

JO - American Journal of Legal History

JF - American Journal of Legal History

SN - 0002-9319

IS - 3

ER -