TY - GEN
T1 - Numerical Study of Reverse Thrust Generation Using Co-Flow Jet
AU - Perlin, Daniel
AU - Zha, Gecheng
N1 - Funding Information:
All simulations are conducted on the Pegasus supercomputing system at the Center for Computational Sciences at the University of Miami. Disclosure: The University of Miami and Dr. GeCheng Zha may receive royalties for future commercialization of the intellectual property used in this study. The University of Miami is also equity owner in Co-Flow Jet, LLC, licensee of the intellectual property used in this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This paper studies a new reversed thrust generation method for airfoils by use of active flow control altered from the regular Co-Flow Jet (CFJ) airfoil. This reverse thrust is generated by a CFJ injection slot duct that is redirected to flow against the freestream flow direction, rather than injecting flow tangentially to the main flow behind the leading edge. Such an injection jet can disrupt the flow with considerable flow separation, thereby decreasing the lift coefficient (C1) and increasing the drag coefficient (Cd). Three configurations of the reverse thrust CFJ concept are derived from a CFJ-NACA 6421 CFJ airfoil to compare the performance characteristics and determine the most effective approach to achieving maximal Cdand minimal C1 with low energy expenditure. The three configurations studied include an injection slot directed upward, an injection slot directed directly outward against the freestream, and an injection slot directed downward. The regular CFJ airfoil and the baseline airfoil with no flow control are also simulated for comparison. All three configurations are simulated, along with a regular CFJ airfoil, at a jet momentum coefficient (Cµ) of 0.03, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4, at angles of attack between 0° and 70°, and at a Mach number M = 0.15. The results for the CFJ configurations are compared with the baseline NACA 6421 airfoil. It reveals the forward-facing injection to be the most effective configuration in general, particularly at high AoA, between 15° and 60°, and Cµ = 0.2~0.3, with inverse aerodynamic efficiencies Cd ⁄Cl increased by up to 993% compared with the baseline NACA 6421 airfoil. The forward injection also requires substantially lower CFJ power than the downward and upward injection. At low angles of attack, AoA = 0°~10°, downward injection appears to be more effective, using Cµ = 0.2~0.3, with Cd ⁄Cl increased by 330% to 480% compared with the baseline airfoil Cd ⁄Cl .
AB - This paper studies a new reversed thrust generation method for airfoils by use of active flow control altered from the regular Co-Flow Jet (CFJ) airfoil. This reverse thrust is generated by a CFJ injection slot duct that is redirected to flow against the freestream flow direction, rather than injecting flow tangentially to the main flow behind the leading edge. Such an injection jet can disrupt the flow with considerable flow separation, thereby decreasing the lift coefficient (C1) and increasing the drag coefficient (Cd). Three configurations of the reverse thrust CFJ concept are derived from a CFJ-NACA 6421 CFJ airfoil to compare the performance characteristics and determine the most effective approach to achieving maximal Cdand minimal C1 with low energy expenditure. The three configurations studied include an injection slot directed upward, an injection slot directed directly outward against the freestream, and an injection slot directed downward. The regular CFJ airfoil and the baseline airfoil with no flow control are also simulated for comparison. All three configurations are simulated, along with a regular CFJ airfoil, at a jet momentum coefficient (Cµ) of 0.03, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4, at angles of attack between 0° and 70°, and at a Mach number M = 0.15. The results for the CFJ configurations are compared with the baseline NACA 6421 airfoil. It reveals the forward-facing injection to be the most effective configuration in general, particularly at high AoA, between 15° and 60°, and Cµ = 0.2~0.3, with inverse aerodynamic efficiencies Cd ⁄Cl increased by up to 993% compared with the baseline NACA 6421 airfoil. The forward injection also requires substantially lower CFJ power than the downward and upward injection. At low angles of attack, AoA = 0°~10°, downward injection appears to be more effective, using Cµ = 0.2~0.3, with Cd ⁄Cl increased by 330% to 480% compared with the baseline airfoil Cd ⁄Cl .
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123642139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123642139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2022-1532
DO - 10.2514/6.2022-1532
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85123642139
SN - 9781624106316
T3 - AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, AIAA SciTech Forum 2022
BT - AIAA SciTech Forum 2022
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, AIAA SciTech Forum 2022
Y2 - 3 January 2022 through 7 January 2022
ER -