Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial

Thomas Balkany; Annelle Hodges; Christine Menapace; Linda Hazard; Colin Driscoll; Bruce Gantz; David Kelsall; William Luxford; Sean McMenomy; J. Gail Neely; Brian Peters; Harold Pillsbury; Joseph Roberson; David Schramm; Steven Telian; Susan Waltzman; Brian Westerberg; Stacy Payne

doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006

Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial

Thomas Balkany, Annelle Hodges, Christine Menapace, Linda Hazard, Colin Driscoll, Bruce Gantz, David Kelsall, William Luxford, Sean McMenomy, J. Gail Neely, Brian Peters, Harold Pillsbury, Joseph Roberson, David Schramm, Steven Telian, Susan Waltzman, Brian Westerberg, Stacy Payne

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

72 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate hearing outcomes and effects of stimulation rate on performance with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant (Cochlear Americas, Denver, CO). Study Design and Setting: Randomized, controlled, prospective, single-blind clinical study using single-subject repeated measures (A-B-A-B) design at 14 academic centers in the United States and Canada and comparison with outcomes of a prior device by the same manufacturer. Patients: Seventy-one severely/profoundly hearing impaired adults. Results: Seventy-one adult recipients were randomly programmed in two different sets of rate: ACE or higher rate ACE RE. Mean scores for Consonant Nucleus Consonant words is 57%, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentences in quiet 78%, and HINT sentences in noise 64%. Sixty-seven percent of subjects preferred slower rates of stimulation, and performance did not improve with higher rates of stimulation using this device. Conclusions: Subjects performed well, and there was no advantage to higher stimulation rates with this device. Significance: Higher stimulation rates do not necessarily result in improved performance.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	757-762
Number of pages	6
Journal	Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume	136
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006
State	Published - May 2007
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery
Otorhinolaryngology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006

Cite this

Balkany, T., Hodges, A., Menapace, C., Hazard, L., Driscoll, C., Gantz, B., Kelsall, D., Luxford, W., McMenomy, S., Neely, J. G., Peters, B., Pillsbury, H., Roberson, J., Schramm, D., Telian, S., Waltzman, S., Westerberg, B., & Payne, S. (2007). Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 136(5), 757-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006

Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. / Balkany, Thomas; Hodges, Annelle; Menapace, Christine; Hazard, Linda; Driscoll, Colin; Gantz, Bruce; Kelsall, David; Luxford, William; McMenomy, Sean; Neely, J. Gail; Peters, Brian; Pillsbury, Harold; Roberson, Joseph; Schramm, David; Telian, Steven; Waltzman, Susan; Westerberg, Brian; Payne, Stacy.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 136, No. 5, 05.2007, p. 757-762.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Balkany, T, Hodges, A, Menapace, C, Hazard, L, Driscoll, C, Gantz, B, Kelsall, D, Luxford, W, McMenomy, S, Neely, JG, Peters, B, Pillsbury, H, Roberson, J, Schramm, D, Telian, S, Waltzman, S, Westerberg, B & Payne, S 2007, 'Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial', Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 757-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006

Balkany, Thomas ; Hodges, Annelle ; Menapace, Christine ; Hazard, Linda ; Driscoll, Colin ; Gantz, Bruce ; Kelsall, David ; Luxford, William ; McMenomy, Sean ; Neely, J. Gail ; Peters, Brian ; Pillsbury, Harold ; Roberson, Joseph ; Schramm, David ; Telian, Steven ; Waltzman, Susan ; Westerberg, Brian ; Payne, Stacy. / Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 136, No. 5. pp. 757-762.

@article{5f99d557fd654c95bfe1c207e2dc5cc0,

title = "Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial",

abstract = "Objective: To evaluate hearing outcomes and effects of stimulation rate on performance with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant (Cochlear Americas, Denver, CO). Study Design and Setting: Randomized, controlled, prospective, single-blind clinical study using single-subject repeated measures (A-B-A-B) design at 14 academic centers in the United States and Canada and comparison with outcomes of a prior device by the same manufacturer. Patients: Seventy-one severely/profoundly hearing impaired adults. Results: Seventy-one adult recipients were randomly programmed in two different sets of rate: ACE or higher rate ACE RE. Mean scores for Consonant Nucleus Consonant words is 57%, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentences in quiet 78%, and HINT sentences in noise 64%. Sixty-seven percent of subjects preferred slower rates of stimulation, and performance did not improve with higher rates of stimulation using this device. Conclusions: Subjects performed well, and there was no advantage to higher stimulation rates with this device. Significance: Higher stimulation rates do not necessarily result in improved performance.",

author = "Thomas Balkany and Annelle Hodges and Christine Menapace and Linda Hazard and Colin Driscoll and Bruce Gantz and David Kelsall and William Luxford and Sean McMenomy and Neely, {J. Gail} and Brian Peters and Harold Pillsbury and Joseph Roberson and David Schramm and Steven Telian and Susan Waltzman and Brian Westerberg and Stacy Payne",

year = "2007",

month = may,

doi = "10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "136",

pages = "757--762",

journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",

issn = "0194-5998",

publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial

AU - Balkany, Thomas

AU - Hodges, Annelle

AU - Menapace, Christine

AU - Hazard, Linda

AU - Driscoll, Colin

AU - Gantz, Bruce

AU - Kelsall, David

AU - Luxford, William

AU - McMenomy, Sean

AU - Neely, J. Gail

AU - Peters, Brian

AU - Pillsbury, Harold

AU - Roberson, Joseph

AU - Schramm, David

AU - Telian, Steven

AU - Waltzman, Susan

AU - Westerberg, Brian

AU - Payne, Stacy

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Objective: To evaluate hearing outcomes and effects of stimulation rate on performance with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant (Cochlear Americas, Denver, CO). Study Design and Setting: Randomized, controlled, prospective, single-blind clinical study using single-subject repeated measures (A-B-A-B) design at 14 academic centers in the United States and Canada and comparison with outcomes of a prior device by the same manufacturer. Patients: Seventy-one severely/profoundly hearing impaired adults. Results: Seventy-one adult recipients were randomly programmed in two different sets of rate: ACE or higher rate ACE RE. Mean scores for Consonant Nucleus Consonant words is 57%, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentences in quiet 78%, and HINT sentences in noise 64%. Sixty-seven percent of subjects preferred slower rates of stimulation, and performance did not improve with higher rates of stimulation using this device. Conclusions: Subjects performed well, and there was no advantage to higher stimulation rates with this device. Significance: Higher stimulation rates do not necessarily result in improved performance.

AB - Objective: To evaluate hearing outcomes and effects of stimulation rate on performance with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant (Cochlear Americas, Denver, CO). Study Design and Setting: Randomized, controlled, prospective, single-blind clinical study using single-subject repeated measures (A-B-A-B) design at 14 academic centers in the United States and Canada and comparison with outcomes of a prior device by the same manufacturer. Patients: Seventy-one severely/profoundly hearing impaired adults. Results: Seventy-one adult recipients were randomly programmed in two different sets of rate: ACE or higher rate ACE RE. Mean scores for Consonant Nucleus Consonant words is 57%, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentences in quiet 78%, and HINT sentences in noise 64%. Sixty-seven percent of subjects preferred slower rates of stimulation, and performance did not improve with higher rates of stimulation using this device. Conclusions: Subjects performed well, and there was no advantage to higher stimulation rates with this device. Significance: Higher stimulation rates do not necessarily result in improved performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247474757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247474757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 17478211

AN - SCOPUS:34247474757

VL - 136

SP - 757

EP - 762

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 5

ER -

Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this