Normal endometrial cells in papanicolaou smears

Prevalence in women with and without endometrial disease

Carmen Gomez-Fernandez, Parvin Ganjei-Azar, Katayoon Behshid, Hervy E. Averette, Mehrdad Nadji

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the prevalence of normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears of women with and those without endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia differs significantly. Methods: Papanicolaou smears of women with biopsy-proved endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma diagnosed between 1990 and 1998 were reviewed for the presence of normal endometrial cells. Chi-square and a power analysis were used to compare these smears with results of smears from women older than 35 years of age with tissue diagnoses other than hyperplasia or carcinoma. All Papanicolaou smears obtained within the 5 years before endometrial sampling were reviewed. Each patient had at least one smear done within the previous 12 months. Clinical information was available for all patients. Results: Of the 201 women in whom endometrial hyperplasia (n = 103) or carcinoma (n = 98) was diagnosed, 4 (2%) had normal endometrial cells in otherwise negative Papanicolaou smears. Of the 289 women in the comparison group, 15 (5%) had normal endometrial cells in their Papanicolaou smears. The prevalence of normal endometrial cells did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = .071). The study had 80% power to detect a 5% or greater difference between groups. Conclusion: The prevalence of normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears of women with endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia does not significantly differ from that in women without these conditions. Reporting normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears according to the recommendations of the Bethesda System may lead to unnecessary procedures and patient anxiety. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)874-878
Number of pages5
JournalObstetrics and Gynecology
Volume96
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 27 2000

Fingerprint

Uterine Diseases
Papanicolaou Test
Endometrial Hyperplasia
Endometrial Neoplasms
Cetirizine
Carcinoma
Unnecessary Procedures
Hyperplasia
Anxiety
Biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Normal endometrial cells in papanicolaou smears : Prevalence in women with and without endometrial disease. / Gomez-Fernandez, Carmen; Ganjei-Azar, Parvin; Behshid, Katayoon; Averette, Hervy E.; Nadji, Mehrdad.

In: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 96, No. 6, 27.11.2000, p. 874-878.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d781dd4047143ee8f145195fd699c62,
title = "Normal endometrial cells in papanicolaou smears: Prevalence in women with and without endometrial disease",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether the prevalence of normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears of women with and those without endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia differs significantly. Methods: Papanicolaou smears of women with biopsy-proved endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma diagnosed between 1990 and 1998 were reviewed for the presence of normal endometrial cells. Chi-square and a power analysis were used to compare these smears with results of smears from women older than 35 years of age with tissue diagnoses other than hyperplasia or carcinoma. All Papanicolaou smears obtained within the 5 years before endometrial sampling were reviewed. Each patient had at least one smear done within the previous 12 months. Clinical information was available for all patients. Results: Of the 201 women in whom endometrial hyperplasia (n = 103) or carcinoma (n = 98) was diagnosed, 4 (2{\%}) had normal endometrial cells in otherwise negative Papanicolaou smears. Of the 289 women in the comparison group, 15 (5{\%}) had normal endometrial cells in their Papanicolaou smears. The prevalence of normal endometrial cells did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = .071). The study had 80{\%} power to detect a 5{\%} or greater difference between groups. Conclusion: The prevalence of normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears of women with endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia does not significantly differ from that in women without these conditions. Reporting normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears according to the recommendations of the Bethesda System may lead to unnecessary procedures and patient anxiety. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.",
author = "Carmen Gomez-Fernandez and Parvin Ganjei-Azar and Katayoon Behshid and Averette, {Hervy E.} and Mehrdad Nadji",
year = "2000",
month = "11",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01038-3",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "874--878",
journal = "Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0029-7844",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normal endometrial cells in papanicolaou smears

T2 - Prevalence in women with and without endometrial disease

AU - Gomez-Fernandez, Carmen

AU - Ganjei-Azar, Parvin

AU - Behshid, Katayoon

AU - Averette, Hervy E.

AU - Nadji, Mehrdad

PY - 2000/11/27

Y1 - 2000/11/27

N2 - Objective: To determine whether the prevalence of normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears of women with and those without endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia differs significantly. Methods: Papanicolaou smears of women with biopsy-proved endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma diagnosed between 1990 and 1998 were reviewed for the presence of normal endometrial cells. Chi-square and a power analysis were used to compare these smears with results of smears from women older than 35 years of age with tissue diagnoses other than hyperplasia or carcinoma. All Papanicolaou smears obtained within the 5 years before endometrial sampling were reviewed. Each patient had at least one smear done within the previous 12 months. Clinical information was available for all patients. Results: Of the 201 women in whom endometrial hyperplasia (n = 103) or carcinoma (n = 98) was diagnosed, 4 (2%) had normal endometrial cells in otherwise negative Papanicolaou smears. Of the 289 women in the comparison group, 15 (5%) had normal endometrial cells in their Papanicolaou smears. The prevalence of normal endometrial cells did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = .071). The study had 80% power to detect a 5% or greater difference between groups. Conclusion: The prevalence of normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears of women with endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia does not significantly differ from that in women without these conditions. Reporting normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears according to the recommendations of the Bethesda System may lead to unnecessary procedures and patient anxiety. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

AB - Objective: To determine whether the prevalence of normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears of women with and those without endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia differs significantly. Methods: Papanicolaou smears of women with biopsy-proved endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma diagnosed between 1990 and 1998 were reviewed for the presence of normal endometrial cells. Chi-square and a power analysis were used to compare these smears with results of smears from women older than 35 years of age with tissue diagnoses other than hyperplasia or carcinoma. All Papanicolaou smears obtained within the 5 years before endometrial sampling were reviewed. Each patient had at least one smear done within the previous 12 months. Clinical information was available for all patients. Results: Of the 201 women in whom endometrial hyperplasia (n = 103) or carcinoma (n = 98) was diagnosed, 4 (2%) had normal endometrial cells in otherwise negative Papanicolaou smears. Of the 289 women in the comparison group, 15 (5%) had normal endometrial cells in their Papanicolaou smears. The prevalence of normal endometrial cells did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = .071). The study had 80% power to detect a 5% or greater difference between groups. Conclusion: The prevalence of normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears of women with endometrial carcinoma or hyperplasia does not significantly differ from that in women without these conditions. Reporting normal endometrial cells in Papanicolaou smears according to the recommendations of the Bethesda System may lead to unnecessary procedures and patient anxiety. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033741777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033741777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01038-3

DO - 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01038-3

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 874

EP - 878

JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0029-7844

IS - 6

ER -