Nonglaucomatous excavation of the optic disc

J. D. Trobe, J. S. Glaser, J. Cassady, J. Herschler, Douglas Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

110 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to test the hypothesis that glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous optic disc cupping can be distinguished ophthalmoscopically, three ophthalmologists experienced in assessing optic discs were asked to view fundus stereophotographs as 'unknowns'. Of 29 eyes with nonglaucomatous optic atrophy, 13 (44%) were misdiagnosed as showing glaucoma by at least one observer. Of four optic disc features specifically analyzed, neuroretinal rim pallor proved to be 94% specific for nonglaucomatous atrophy, while focal or diffuse obliteration of the neuroretinal rim was 87% specific for glaucoma. These two signs are the most useful in making the distinction. Thinning of the rim was more common in glaucoma than in nonglaucomatous atrophy, but was only 47% specific for glaucoma. Laminar dots were present in both types of excavation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1046-1050
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Ophthalmology
Volume98
Issue number6
StatePublished - Aug 29 1980

Fingerprint

Optic Disk
Glaucoma
Atrophy
Pallor
Optic Atrophy
Diagnostic Errors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Trobe, J. D., Glaser, J. S., Cassady, J., Herschler, J., & Anderson, D. (1980). Nonglaucomatous excavation of the optic disc. Archives of Ophthalmology, 98(6), 1046-1050.

Nonglaucomatous excavation of the optic disc. / Trobe, J. D.; Glaser, J. S.; Cassady, J.; Herschler, J.; Anderson, Douglas.

In: Archives of Ophthalmology, Vol. 98, No. 6, 29.08.1980, p. 1046-1050.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trobe, JD, Glaser, JS, Cassady, J, Herschler, J & Anderson, D 1980, 'Nonglaucomatous excavation of the optic disc', Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1046-1050.
Trobe JD, Glaser JS, Cassady J, Herschler J, Anderson D. Nonglaucomatous excavation of the optic disc. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1980 Aug 29;98(6):1046-1050.
Trobe, J. D. ; Glaser, J. S. ; Cassady, J. ; Herschler, J. ; Anderson, Douglas. / Nonglaucomatous excavation of the optic disc. In: Archives of Ophthalmology. 1980 ; Vol. 98, No. 6. pp. 1046-1050.
@article{3d129df844d344f6ba849bfeca400f11,
title = "Nonglaucomatous excavation of the optic disc",
abstract = "In order to test the hypothesis that glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous optic disc cupping can be distinguished ophthalmoscopically, three ophthalmologists experienced in assessing optic discs were asked to view fundus stereophotographs as 'unknowns'. Of 29 eyes with nonglaucomatous optic atrophy, 13 (44{\%}) were misdiagnosed as showing glaucoma by at least one observer. Of four optic disc features specifically analyzed, neuroretinal rim pallor proved to be 94{\%} specific for nonglaucomatous atrophy, while focal or diffuse obliteration of the neuroretinal rim was 87{\%} specific for glaucoma. These two signs are the most useful in making the distinction. Thinning of the rim was more common in glaucoma than in nonglaucomatous atrophy, but was only 47{\%} specific for glaucoma. Laminar dots were present in both types of excavation.",
author = "Trobe, {J. D.} and Glaser, {J. S.} and J. Cassady and J. Herschler and Douglas Anderson",
year = "1980",
month = "8",
day = "29",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "1046--1050",
journal = "JAMA Ophthalmology",
issn = "2168-6165",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonglaucomatous excavation of the optic disc

AU - Trobe, J. D.

AU - Glaser, J. S.

AU - Cassady, J.

AU - Herschler, J.

AU - Anderson, Douglas

PY - 1980/8/29

Y1 - 1980/8/29

N2 - In order to test the hypothesis that glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous optic disc cupping can be distinguished ophthalmoscopically, three ophthalmologists experienced in assessing optic discs were asked to view fundus stereophotographs as 'unknowns'. Of 29 eyes with nonglaucomatous optic atrophy, 13 (44%) were misdiagnosed as showing glaucoma by at least one observer. Of four optic disc features specifically analyzed, neuroretinal rim pallor proved to be 94% specific for nonglaucomatous atrophy, while focal or diffuse obliteration of the neuroretinal rim was 87% specific for glaucoma. These two signs are the most useful in making the distinction. Thinning of the rim was more common in glaucoma than in nonglaucomatous atrophy, but was only 47% specific for glaucoma. Laminar dots were present in both types of excavation.

AB - In order to test the hypothesis that glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous optic disc cupping can be distinguished ophthalmoscopically, three ophthalmologists experienced in assessing optic discs were asked to view fundus stereophotographs as 'unknowns'. Of 29 eyes with nonglaucomatous optic atrophy, 13 (44%) were misdiagnosed as showing glaucoma by at least one observer. Of four optic disc features specifically analyzed, neuroretinal rim pallor proved to be 94% specific for nonglaucomatous atrophy, while focal or diffuse obliteration of the neuroretinal rim was 87% specific for glaucoma. These two signs are the most useful in making the distinction. Thinning of the rim was more common in glaucoma than in nonglaucomatous atrophy, but was only 47% specific for glaucoma. Laminar dots were present in both types of excavation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018827750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018827750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7387507

AN - SCOPUS:0018827750

VL - 98

SP - 1046

EP - 1050

JO - JAMA Ophthalmology

JF - JAMA Ophthalmology

SN - 2168-6165

IS - 6

ER -