Nonexpert Ratings of Family and Parent-Child Interaction

Jason K. Baker, Daniel S Messinger, Naomi V. Ekas, Kristin Lindahl, Ryan Brewster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Observational methods benefit the study of family process, but many expert rating systems are costly and time-consuming. This study examined the utility of using small groups of eight to ten nonexperts to rate family conflict and maternal sensitivity. Videotaped triadic interactions of 39 families were drawn from Lindahl (1998), and 22 mother-toddler free-play interactions were drawn from Baker, Messinger, Lyons, and Grantz (2010). Sixty undergraduates rated interactions from these samples in real time using computer-assisted technology. Nonexpert ratings of family conflict were reliable, demonstrated high concordance with expert ratings, and replicated a key finding from Lindahl (1998). Nonexpert ratings of maternal sensitivity replicated a relevant finding from Baker, Messinger et al. (2010). Concordance was lower for maternal sensitivity, however, because of the tendency of nonexperts to overattend to sensitive structuring compared with emotional supportiveness. A second study indicated that as few as six nonexperts could effectively rate maternal sensitive structuring, but that nonexperts were unable to accurately rate emotional supportiveness. Implications for research methods and for our understanding of these important family constructs are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)775-778
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Family Psychology
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mothers
Family Conflict
Expert Systems
Technology
Research

Keywords

  • Family conflict
  • Methods
  • Nonexperts
  • Observation
  • Sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Nonexpert Ratings of Family and Parent-Child Interaction. / Baker, Jason K.; Messinger, Daniel S; Ekas, Naomi V.; Lindahl, Kristin; Brewster, Ryan.

In: Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 6, 01.12.2010, p. 775-778.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baker, Jason K. ; Messinger, Daniel S ; Ekas, Naomi V. ; Lindahl, Kristin ; Brewster, Ryan. / Nonexpert Ratings of Family and Parent-Child Interaction. In: Journal of Family Psychology. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 775-778.
@article{d635d527c72048a189866c5bbe37a92a,
title = "Nonexpert Ratings of Family and Parent-Child Interaction",
abstract = "Observational methods benefit the study of family process, but many expert rating systems are costly and time-consuming. This study examined the utility of using small groups of eight to ten nonexperts to rate family conflict and maternal sensitivity. Videotaped triadic interactions of 39 families were drawn from Lindahl (1998), and 22 mother-toddler free-play interactions were drawn from Baker, Messinger, Lyons, and Grantz (2010). Sixty undergraduates rated interactions from these samples in real time using computer-assisted technology. Nonexpert ratings of family conflict were reliable, demonstrated high concordance with expert ratings, and replicated a key finding from Lindahl (1998). Nonexpert ratings of maternal sensitivity replicated a relevant finding from Baker, Messinger et al. (2010). Concordance was lower for maternal sensitivity, however, because of the tendency of nonexperts to overattend to sensitive structuring compared with emotional supportiveness. A second study indicated that as few as six nonexperts could effectively rate maternal sensitive structuring, but that nonexperts were unable to accurately rate emotional supportiveness. Implications for research methods and for our understanding of these important family constructs are discussed.",
keywords = "Family conflict, Methods, Nonexperts, Observation, Sensitivity",
author = "Baker, {Jason K.} and Messinger, {Daniel S} and Ekas, {Naomi V.} and Kristin Lindahl and Ryan Brewster",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0021275",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "775--778",
journal = "Journal of Family Psychology",
issn = "0893-3200",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonexpert Ratings of Family and Parent-Child Interaction

AU - Baker, Jason K.

AU - Messinger, Daniel S

AU - Ekas, Naomi V.

AU - Lindahl, Kristin

AU - Brewster, Ryan

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Observational methods benefit the study of family process, but many expert rating systems are costly and time-consuming. This study examined the utility of using small groups of eight to ten nonexperts to rate family conflict and maternal sensitivity. Videotaped triadic interactions of 39 families were drawn from Lindahl (1998), and 22 mother-toddler free-play interactions were drawn from Baker, Messinger, Lyons, and Grantz (2010). Sixty undergraduates rated interactions from these samples in real time using computer-assisted technology. Nonexpert ratings of family conflict were reliable, demonstrated high concordance with expert ratings, and replicated a key finding from Lindahl (1998). Nonexpert ratings of maternal sensitivity replicated a relevant finding from Baker, Messinger et al. (2010). Concordance was lower for maternal sensitivity, however, because of the tendency of nonexperts to overattend to sensitive structuring compared with emotional supportiveness. A second study indicated that as few as six nonexperts could effectively rate maternal sensitive structuring, but that nonexperts were unable to accurately rate emotional supportiveness. Implications for research methods and for our understanding of these important family constructs are discussed.

AB - Observational methods benefit the study of family process, but many expert rating systems are costly and time-consuming. This study examined the utility of using small groups of eight to ten nonexperts to rate family conflict and maternal sensitivity. Videotaped triadic interactions of 39 families were drawn from Lindahl (1998), and 22 mother-toddler free-play interactions were drawn from Baker, Messinger, Lyons, and Grantz (2010). Sixty undergraduates rated interactions from these samples in real time using computer-assisted technology. Nonexpert ratings of family conflict were reliable, demonstrated high concordance with expert ratings, and replicated a key finding from Lindahl (1998). Nonexpert ratings of maternal sensitivity replicated a relevant finding from Baker, Messinger et al. (2010). Concordance was lower for maternal sensitivity, however, because of the tendency of nonexperts to overattend to sensitive structuring compared with emotional supportiveness. A second study indicated that as few as six nonexperts could effectively rate maternal sensitive structuring, but that nonexperts were unable to accurately rate emotional supportiveness. Implications for research methods and for our understanding of these important family constructs are discussed.

KW - Family conflict

KW - Methods

KW - Nonexperts

KW - Observation

KW - Sensitivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650758037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650758037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0021275

DO - 10.1037/a0021275

M3 - Article

C2 - 21171776

AN - SCOPUS:78650758037

VL - 24

SP - 775

EP - 778

JO - Journal of Family Psychology

JF - Journal of Family Psychology

SN - 0893-3200

IS - 6

ER -