Non-surgical chronic pain treatment outcome

A review

David A Fishbain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Meta-analysis (MAs) of non-surgical chronic pain treatment studies were systematically reviewed to determine effectiveness. Twenty-four MAs were found relating to non-surgical, non-malignant, non-headache chronic pain treatment. Two natural groupings, pain facility treatment and specific pain treatments, were created. In addition, a number of the MAs examined the same treatments including pain facility treatments, manipulation, capsaicin, acupuncture, antidepressants, back school, physical therapy, and cognitive behavior treatments. MAs addressing the same treatments were reviewed for replicate variability or reliability of results, thereby allowing some conclusions about the consistency of this type of data. The following treatment were consistently effective demonstrating replicate non-variability or reliability: pain facility treatment, capsaicin, anti-depressants, physical therapy, topical NSAIDs, and cognitive behavioral treatments. Only one MA demonstrated the effectiveness of anticonvulsants and psychoeducational. Potential problems with the reviewed MAs and cost effectiveness of treatment are discussed. Finally, potential future initiatives in this area of research are presented. Although pain facility treatment and a number of specific pain treatments are consistently demonstrated to be effective, at the present time, it is impossible to isolate a set of 'effective treatments' within the pain facility treatment package.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-180
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Review of Psychiatry
Volume12
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Chronic Pain
Meta-Analysis
Pain
Therapeutics
Capsaicin
Cognitive Therapy
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Acupuncture
Reproducibility of Results
Anticonvulsants
Antidepressive Agents
Cost-Benefit Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Non-surgical chronic pain treatment outcome : A review. / Fishbain, David A.

In: International Review of Psychiatry, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.01.2000, p. 170-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fishbain, David A. / Non-surgical chronic pain treatment outcome : A review. In: International Review of Psychiatry. 2000 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 170-180.
@article{a26c7ce89c4a4732874b78f46aeb79a8,
title = "Non-surgical chronic pain treatment outcome: A review",
abstract = "Meta-analysis (MAs) of non-surgical chronic pain treatment studies were systematically reviewed to determine effectiveness. Twenty-four MAs were found relating to non-surgical, non-malignant, non-headache chronic pain treatment. Two natural groupings, pain facility treatment and specific pain treatments, were created. In addition, a number of the MAs examined the same treatments including pain facility treatments, manipulation, capsaicin, acupuncture, antidepressants, back school, physical therapy, and cognitive behavior treatments. MAs addressing the same treatments were reviewed for replicate variability or reliability of results, thereby allowing some conclusions about the consistency of this type of data. The following treatment were consistently effective demonstrating replicate non-variability or reliability: pain facility treatment, capsaicin, anti-depressants, physical therapy, topical NSAIDs, and cognitive behavioral treatments. Only one MA demonstrated the effectiveness of anticonvulsants and psychoeducational. Potential problems with the reviewed MAs and cost effectiveness of treatment are discussed. Finally, potential future initiatives in this area of research are presented. Although pain facility treatment and a number of specific pain treatments are consistently demonstrated to be effective, at the present time, it is impossible to isolate a set of 'effective treatments' within the pain facility treatment package.",
author = "Fishbain, {David A}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "170--180",
journal = "International Review of Psychiatry",
issn = "0954-0261",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-surgical chronic pain treatment outcome

T2 - A review

AU - Fishbain, David A

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Meta-analysis (MAs) of non-surgical chronic pain treatment studies were systematically reviewed to determine effectiveness. Twenty-four MAs were found relating to non-surgical, non-malignant, non-headache chronic pain treatment. Two natural groupings, pain facility treatment and specific pain treatments, were created. In addition, a number of the MAs examined the same treatments including pain facility treatments, manipulation, capsaicin, acupuncture, antidepressants, back school, physical therapy, and cognitive behavior treatments. MAs addressing the same treatments were reviewed for replicate variability or reliability of results, thereby allowing some conclusions about the consistency of this type of data. The following treatment were consistently effective demonstrating replicate non-variability or reliability: pain facility treatment, capsaicin, anti-depressants, physical therapy, topical NSAIDs, and cognitive behavioral treatments. Only one MA demonstrated the effectiveness of anticonvulsants and psychoeducational. Potential problems with the reviewed MAs and cost effectiveness of treatment are discussed. Finally, potential future initiatives in this area of research are presented. Although pain facility treatment and a number of specific pain treatments are consistently demonstrated to be effective, at the present time, it is impossible to isolate a set of 'effective treatments' within the pain facility treatment package.

AB - Meta-analysis (MAs) of non-surgical chronic pain treatment studies were systematically reviewed to determine effectiveness. Twenty-four MAs were found relating to non-surgical, non-malignant, non-headache chronic pain treatment. Two natural groupings, pain facility treatment and specific pain treatments, were created. In addition, a number of the MAs examined the same treatments including pain facility treatments, manipulation, capsaicin, acupuncture, antidepressants, back school, physical therapy, and cognitive behavior treatments. MAs addressing the same treatments were reviewed for replicate variability or reliability of results, thereby allowing some conclusions about the consistency of this type of data. The following treatment were consistently effective demonstrating replicate non-variability or reliability: pain facility treatment, capsaicin, anti-depressants, physical therapy, topical NSAIDs, and cognitive behavioral treatments. Only one MA demonstrated the effectiveness of anticonvulsants and psychoeducational. Potential problems with the reviewed MAs and cost effectiveness of treatment are discussed. Finally, potential future initiatives in this area of research are presented. Although pain facility treatment and a number of specific pain treatments are consistently demonstrated to be effective, at the present time, it is impossible to isolate a set of 'effective treatments' within the pain facility treatment package.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034107560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034107560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 170

EP - 180

JO - International Review of Psychiatry

JF - International Review of Psychiatry

SN - 0954-0261

IS - 2

ER -