New urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

New Urbanism has been described as the most influential movement in architecture and planning in the United States since the Modernist movement. In recent years, New Urbanist design principles have been adopted for many housing and neighborhood planning efforts. This article considers the applications and implications of New Urbanism for distressed inner-city neighborhoods. Claims and criticisms of New Urbanism are examined and the long-standing debates over the extent to which physical planning and design can affect human behavior are revisited. The article concludes that New Urbanism is not a panacea, but that its design principles are consistent with broader policies aimed at revitalizing and improving living conditions and opportunities for inner-city residents. New Urbanism needs to be viewed as one strategy to be integrated within the larger array of economic, social, and community development programs attempting to revitalize and improve the quality of life in inner-city neighborhoods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)761-801
Number of pages41
JournalHousing Policy Debate
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

planning
human behavior
community development
social development
living conditions
quality of life
economic development
criticism
housing
resident
economics
inner city
city
living condition
policy
programme
physical planning

Keywords

  • Development/Revitalization
  • Low-income housing
  • Urban planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Urban Studies
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

New urbanism and the city : Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods. / Bohl, Charles.

In: Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 11, No. 4, 01.01.2000, p. 761-801.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{929b19bad90e48c593c58bb42235db60,
title = "New urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods",
abstract = "New Urbanism has been described as the most influential movement in architecture and planning in the United States since the Modernist movement. In recent years, New Urbanist design principles have been adopted for many housing and neighborhood planning efforts. This article considers the applications and implications of New Urbanism for distressed inner-city neighborhoods. Claims and criticisms of New Urbanism are examined and the long-standing debates over the extent to which physical planning and design can affect human behavior are revisited. The article concludes that New Urbanism is not a panacea, but that its design principles are consistent with broader policies aimed at revitalizing and improving living conditions and opportunities for inner-city residents. New Urbanism needs to be viewed as one strategy to be integrated within the larger array of economic, social, and community development programs attempting to revitalize and improve the quality of life in inner-city neighborhoods.",
keywords = "Development/Revitalization, Low-income housing, Urban planning",
author = "Charles Bohl",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10511482.2000.9521387",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "761--801",
journal = "Housing Policy Debate",
issn = "1051-1482",
publisher = "Taylor Graham Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New urbanism and the city

T2 - Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods

AU - Bohl, Charles

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - New Urbanism has been described as the most influential movement in architecture and planning in the United States since the Modernist movement. In recent years, New Urbanist design principles have been adopted for many housing and neighborhood planning efforts. This article considers the applications and implications of New Urbanism for distressed inner-city neighborhoods. Claims and criticisms of New Urbanism are examined and the long-standing debates over the extent to which physical planning and design can affect human behavior are revisited. The article concludes that New Urbanism is not a panacea, but that its design principles are consistent with broader policies aimed at revitalizing and improving living conditions and opportunities for inner-city residents. New Urbanism needs to be viewed as one strategy to be integrated within the larger array of economic, social, and community development programs attempting to revitalize and improve the quality of life in inner-city neighborhoods.

AB - New Urbanism has been described as the most influential movement in architecture and planning in the United States since the Modernist movement. In recent years, New Urbanist design principles have been adopted for many housing and neighborhood planning efforts. This article considers the applications and implications of New Urbanism for distressed inner-city neighborhoods. Claims and criticisms of New Urbanism are examined and the long-standing debates over the extent to which physical planning and design can affect human behavior are revisited. The article concludes that New Urbanism is not a panacea, but that its design principles are consistent with broader policies aimed at revitalizing and improving living conditions and opportunities for inner-city residents. New Urbanism needs to be viewed as one strategy to be integrated within the larger array of economic, social, and community development programs attempting to revitalize and improve the quality of life in inner-city neighborhoods.

KW - Development/Revitalization

KW - Low-income housing

KW - Urban planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001614780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001614780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10511482.2000.9521387

DO - 10.1080/10511482.2000.9521387

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001614780

VL - 11

SP - 761

EP - 801

JO - Housing Policy Debate

JF - Housing Policy Debate

SN - 1051-1482

IS - 4

ER -