New principles for optimum left ventriculography

F. J. Hildner, A. Furst, R. Krieger, M. Chengot, R. P. Javier, A. O. Tolentino, P. Samet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Left ventriculography has become the single most important procedure in the evaluation of cardiac function. This study reevaluated the refinements of catheter and power injector technology to assess recommendations of past years and establish new principles for optimum ventriculography. Ventriculograms from 102 patients undergoing left heart catheterization and coronary arteriography for coronary, valvular, and myocardial heart disease served as the test sample. Three styles of #7F high-flow 110-cm pigtail catheters were utilized. One had 12 sideholes while the other two had six sideholes positioned nearer the base of the curl. Analysis of ventriculographic quality of each angiogram was performed by three of the authors independently and subsequently together. Five variables were analyzed for their effect on the diagnostic quality of the angiogram: 6-hole catheters, 12-hole catheters, volume of contrast, flow rate, and location of injection. Once these analyses were complete, the effect of combinations of these variables was tested to determine their effect on angiographic quality. The first combination included contrast volume and flow rate. The second combination compared contrast volume and flow rate when utilized with 6- or 12-hole catheters. The third combination tested the 6- and 12-hole catheters in the apex or inflow locations. A multivariate contingency analysis was used to define relationships between the variables and the quality of the angiogram obtained. As independent variables, catheter style, volume of contrast, flow rate, and location of injection did not influence angiographic quality. However, the apex as a location of injection was the single most consistently important determinant of ventricular angiographic quality. Combination variables of contrast volume and flow rate did not affect angiographic quality. But when these were tested using 6- and 12-holes catheters, high volume and low flow through a 6-hole catheter achieved a result significantly better than all other combinations. Low flow rates were superior to high flow in nearly all combinations tested. The combination of 6-hole catheter in the apex was substantially better than the 12-hole in the inflow tract or any of the four other combinations. When total volume of contrast must be limited because of ventricular dysfunction, valvular heart disease, or renal disease, injection of relatively small amounts of contrast using low flow rates through a 6-hole catheter positioned deep in the ventricle should permit a safe study to be diagnostically superior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-273
Number of pages8
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Catheters
Angiography
Heart Valve Diseases
Injections
Ventricular Dysfunction
Cardiac Catheterization
Cardiomyopathies
Multivariate Analysis
Technology
Kidney

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Hildner, F. J., Furst, A., Krieger, R., Chengot, M., Javier, R. P., Tolentino, A. O., & Samet, P. (1986). New principles for optimum left ventriculography. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 12(4), 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810120412

New principles for optimum left ventriculography. / Hildner, F. J.; Furst, A.; Krieger, R.; Chengot, M.; Javier, R. P.; Tolentino, A. O.; Samet, P.

In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, Vol. 12, No. 4, 01.12.1986, p. 266-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hildner, FJ, Furst, A, Krieger, R, Chengot, M, Javier, RP, Tolentino, AO & Samet, P 1986, 'New principles for optimum left ventriculography', Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810120412
Hildner FJ, Furst A, Krieger R, Chengot M, Javier RP, Tolentino AO et al. New principles for optimum left ventriculography. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis. 1986 Dec 1;12(4):266-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810120412
Hildner, F. J. ; Furst, A. ; Krieger, R. ; Chengot, M. ; Javier, R. P. ; Tolentino, A. O. ; Samet, P. / New principles for optimum left ventriculography. In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis. 1986 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 266-273.
@article{714892ae44e043fb993572abb8048e64,
title = "New principles for optimum left ventriculography",
abstract = "Left ventriculography has become the single most important procedure in the evaluation of cardiac function. This study reevaluated the refinements of catheter and power injector technology to assess recommendations of past years and establish new principles for optimum ventriculography. Ventriculograms from 102 patients undergoing left heart catheterization and coronary arteriography for coronary, valvular, and myocardial heart disease served as the test sample. Three styles of #7F high-flow 110-cm pigtail catheters were utilized. One had 12 sideholes while the other two had six sideholes positioned nearer the base of the curl. Analysis of ventriculographic quality of each angiogram was performed by three of the authors independently and subsequently together. Five variables were analyzed for their effect on the diagnostic quality of the angiogram: 6-hole catheters, 12-hole catheters, volume of contrast, flow rate, and location of injection. Once these analyses were complete, the effect of combinations of these variables was tested to determine their effect on angiographic quality. The first combination included contrast volume and flow rate. The second combination compared contrast volume and flow rate when utilized with 6- or 12-hole catheters. The third combination tested the 6- and 12-hole catheters in the apex or inflow locations. A multivariate contingency analysis was used to define relationships between the variables and the quality of the angiogram obtained. As independent variables, catheter style, volume of contrast, flow rate, and location of injection did not influence angiographic quality. However, the apex as a location of injection was the single most consistently important determinant of ventricular angiographic quality. Combination variables of contrast volume and flow rate did not affect angiographic quality. But when these were tested using 6- and 12-holes catheters, high volume and low flow through a 6-hole catheter achieved a result significantly better than all other combinations. Low flow rates were superior to high flow in nearly all combinations tested. The combination of 6-hole catheter in the apex was substantially better than the 12-hole in the inflow tract or any of the four other combinations. When total volume of contrast must be limited because of ventricular dysfunction, valvular heart disease, or renal disease, injection of relatively small amounts of contrast using low flow rates through a 6-hole catheter positioned deep in the ventricle should permit a safe study to be diagnostically superior.",
author = "Hildner, {F. J.} and A. Furst and R. Krieger and M. Chengot and Javier, {R. P.} and Tolentino, {A. O.} and P. Samet",
year = "1986",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ccd.1810120412",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "266--273",
journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1522-1946",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New principles for optimum left ventriculography

AU - Hildner, F. J.

AU - Furst, A.

AU - Krieger, R.

AU - Chengot, M.

AU - Javier, R. P.

AU - Tolentino, A. O.

AU - Samet, P.

PY - 1986/12/1

Y1 - 1986/12/1

N2 - Left ventriculography has become the single most important procedure in the evaluation of cardiac function. This study reevaluated the refinements of catheter and power injector technology to assess recommendations of past years and establish new principles for optimum ventriculography. Ventriculograms from 102 patients undergoing left heart catheterization and coronary arteriography for coronary, valvular, and myocardial heart disease served as the test sample. Three styles of #7F high-flow 110-cm pigtail catheters were utilized. One had 12 sideholes while the other two had six sideholes positioned nearer the base of the curl. Analysis of ventriculographic quality of each angiogram was performed by three of the authors independently and subsequently together. Five variables were analyzed for their effect on the diagnostic quality of the angiogram: 6-hole catheters, 12-hole catheters, volume of contrast, flow rate, and location of injection. Once these analyses were complete, the effect of combinations of these variables was tested to determine their effect on angiographic quality. The first combination included contrast volume and flow rate. The second combination compared contrast volume and flow rate when utilized with 6- or 12-hole catheters. The third combination tested the 6- and 12-hole catheters in the apex or inflow locations. A multivariate contingency analysis was used to define relationships between the variables and the quality of the angiogram obtained. As independent variables, catheter style, volume of contrast, flow rate, and location of injection did not influence angiographic quality. However, the apex as a location of injection was the single most consistently important determinant of ventricular angiographic quality. Combination variables of contrast volume and flow rate did not affect angiographic quality. But when these were tested using 6- and 12-holes catheters, high volume and low flow through a 6-hole catheter achieved a result significantly better than all other combinations. Low flow rates were superior to high flow in nearly all combinations tested. The combination of 6-hole catheter in the apex was substantially better than the 12-hole in the inflow tract or any of the four other combinations. When total volume of contrast must be limited because of ventricular dysfunction, valvular heart disease, or renal disease, injection of relatively small amounts of contrast using low flow rates through a 6-hole catheter positioned deep in the ventricle should permit a safe study to be diagnostically superior.

AB - Left ventriculography has become the single most important procedure in the evaluation of cardiac function. This study reevaluated the refinements of catheter and power injector technology to assess recommendations of past years and establish new principles for optimum ventriculography. Ventriculograms from 102 patients undergoing left heart catheterization and coronary arteriography for coronary, valvular, and myocardial heart disease served as the test sample. Three styles of #7F high-flow 110-cm pigtail catheters were utilized. One had 12 sideholes while the other two had six sideholes positioned nearer the base of the curl. Analysis of ventriculographic quality of each angiogram was performed by three of the authors independently and subsequently together. Five variables were analyzed for their effect on the diagnostic quality of the angiogram: 6-hole catheters, 12-hole catheters, volume of contrast, flow rate, and location of injection. Once these analyses were complete, the effect of combinations of these variables was tested to determine their effect on angiographic quality. The first combination included contrast volume and flow rate. The second combination compared contrast volume and flow rate when utilized with 6- or 12-hole catheters. The third combination tested the 6- and 12-hole catheters in the apex or inflow locations. A multivariate contingency analysis was used to define relationships between the variables and the quality of the angiogram obtained. As independent variables, catheter style, volume of contrast, flow rate, and location of injection did not influence angiographic quality. However, the apex as a location of injection was the single most consistently important determinant of ventricular angiographic quality. Combination variables of contrast volume and flow rate did not affect angiographic quality. But when these were tested using 6- and 12-holes catheters, high volume and low flow through a 6-hole catheter achieved a result significantly better than all other combinations. Low flow rates were superior to high flow in nearly all combinations tested. The combination of 6-hole catheter in the apex was substantially better than the 12-hole in the inflow tract or any of the four other combinations. When total volume of contrast must be limited because of ventricular dysfunction, valvular heart disease, or renal disease, injection of relatively small amounts of contrast using low flow rates through a 6-hole catheter positioned deep in the ventricle should permit a safe study to be diagnostically superior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022976759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022976759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ccd.1810120412

DO - 10.1002/ccd.1810120412

M3 - Article

C2 - 3757026

AN - SCOPUS:0022976759

VL - 12

SP - 266

EP - 273

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 4

ER -