Neurocognition, functional capacity, and functional outcomes: The cost of inexperience

Katherine Holshausen, Christopher R. Bowie, Brent T. Mausbach, Thomas L. Patterson, Philip D Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Neurocognitive impairments are the strongest predictor of functional deficits in schizophrenia, but adaptive (i.e., functional) capacity, typically measured with performance-based assessments, yields an objective index of current abilities, whereas real-world functional performance relies on observations of community activity. However, limited experiences in the community may limit the acquisition, retention, or expression of these skills. Methods: We examined the frequency of engagement in behaviors that are assessed in the current "gold standard" in person functional capacity assessment. The UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (i.e., UPSA) examines skills associated with recreational engagement, handling money, scheduling appointments, and navigating public transportation. We used neurocognition, experience, and UPSA performance as predictors of the relationships among cognition and real-world functioning variables. Results: Neurocognition was a significant correlate of UPSA scores regardless of whether it was forced into the model before or after prior experience, whereas experience was only a significant predictor of UPSA scores when entered before neurocognition. Further, functional capacity, neurocognition, and experience were significant predictors of real-world outcomes and experience remained a significant predictor regardless of the order it was entered into the model. Conclusions: The amount of current experience with functional tasks is not a rate-limiter of the relationships between neurocognition and functional capacity but does account for some previously unexplained variance in the functional capacity-everyday functioning relationship. These findings underscore the importance of neurocognitive deficits as they relate to functional capacity in schizophrenia, and suggest an incremental functional cost of limited experience with independent living.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)430-434
Number of pages5
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume152
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Independent Living
Costs and Cost Analysis
Aptitude
Cognition
Appointments and Schedules

Keywords

  • Adaptive functioning
  • Cognition
  • Outcome
  • Schizophrenia
  • Skill acquisition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Neurocognition, functional capacity, and functional outcomes : The cost of inexperience. / Holshausen, Katherine; Bowie, Christopher R.; Mausbach, Brent T.; Patterson, Thomas L.; Harvey, Philip D.

In: Schizophrenia Research, Vol. 152, No. 2-3, 01.02.2014, p. 430-434.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holshausen, Katherine ; Bowie, Christopher R. ; Mausbach, Brent T. ; Patterson, Thomas L. ; Harvey, Philip D. / Neurocognition, functional capacity, and functional outcomes : The cost of inexperience. In: Schizophrenia Research. 2014 ; Vol. 152, No. 2-3. pp. 430-434.
@article{c7ae91b0533f40ebb3557c44bffc8e3c,
title = "Neurocognition, functional capacity, and functional outcomes: The cost of inexperience",
abstract = "Background: Neurocognitive impairments are the strongest predictor of functional deficits in schizophrenia, but adaptive (i.e., functional) capacity, typically measured with performance-based assessments, yields an objective index of current abilities, whereas real-world functional performance relies on observations of community activity. However, limited experiences in the community may limit the acquisition, retention, or expression of these skills. Methods: We examined the frequency of engagement in behaviors that are assessed in the current {"}gold standard{"} in person functional capacity assessment. The UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (i.e., UPSA) examines skills associated with recreational engagement, handling money, scheduling appointments, and navigating public transportation. We used neurocognition, experience, and UPSA performance as predictors of the relationships among cognition and real-world functioning variables. Results: Neurocognition was a significant correlate of UPSA scores regardless of whether it was forced into the model before or after prior experience, whereas experience was only a significant predictor of UPSA scores when entered before neurocognition. Further, functional capacity, neurocognition, and experience were significant predictors of real-world outcomes and experience remained a significant predictor regardless of the order it was entered into the model. Conclusions: The amount of current experience with functional tasks is not a rate-limiter of the relationships between neurocognition and functional capacity but does account for some previously unexplained variance in the functional capacity-everyday functioning relationship. These findings underscore the importance of neurocognitive deficits as they relate to functional capacity in schizophrenia, and suggest an incremental functional cost of limited experience with independent living.",
keywords = "Adaptive functioning, Cognition, Outcome, Schizophrenia, Skill acquisition",
author = "Katherine Holshausen and Bowie, {Christopher R.} and Mausbach, {Brent T.} and Patterson, {Thomas L.} and Harvey, {Philip D}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.schres.2013.08.004",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
pages = "430--434",
journal = "Schizophrenia Research",
issn = "0920-9964",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurocognition, functional capacity, and functional outcomes

T2 - The cost of inexperience

AU - Holshausen, Katherine

AU - Bowie, Christopher R.

AU - Mausbach, Brent T.

AU - Patterson, Thomas L.

AU - Harvey, Philip D

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - Background: Neurocognitive impairments are the strongest predictor of functional deficits in schizophrenia, but adaptive (i.e., functional) capacity, typically measured with performance-based assessments, yields an objective index of current abilities, whereas real-world functional performance relies on observations of community activity. However, limited experiences in the community may limit the acquisition, retention, or expression of these skills. Methods: We examined the frequency of engagement in behaviors that are assessed in the current "gold standard" in person functional capacity assessment. The UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (i.e., UPSA) examines skills associated with recreational engagement, handling money, scheduling appointments, and navigating public transportation. We used neurocognition, experience, and UPSA performance as predictors of the relationships among cognition and real-world functioning variables. Results: Neurocognition was a significant correlate of UPSA scores regardless of whether it was forced into the model before or after prior experience, whereas experience was only a significant predictor of UPSA scores when entered before neurocognition. Further, functional capacity, neurocognition, and experience were significant predictors of real-world outcomes and experience remained a significant predictor regardless of the order it was entered into the model. Conclusions: The amount of current experience with functional tasks is not a rate-limiter of the relationships between neurocognition and functional capacity but does account for some previously unexplained variance in the functional capacity-everyday functioning relationship. These findings underscore the importance of neurocognitive deficits as they relate to functional capacity in schizophrenia, and suggest an incremental functional cost of limited experience with independent living.

AB - Background: Neurocognitive impairments are the strongest predictor of functional deficits in schizophrenia, but adaptive (i.e., functional) capacity, typically measured with performance-based assessments, yields an objective index of current abilities, whereas real-world functional performance relies on observations of community activity. However, limited experiences in the community may limit the acquisition, retention, or expression of these skills. Methods: We examined the frequency of engagement in behaviors that are assessed in the current "gold standard" in person functional capacity assessment. The UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (i.e., UPSA) examines skills associated with recreational engagement, handling money, scheduling appointments, and navigating public transportation. We used neurocognition, experience, and UPSA performance as predictors of the relationships among cognition and real-world functioning variables. Results: Neurocognition was a significant correlate of UPSA scores regardless of whether it was forced into the model before or after prior experience, whereas experience was only a significant predictor of UPSA scores when entered before neurocognition. Further, functional capacity, neurocognition, and experience were significant predictors of real-world outcomes and experience remained a significant predictor regardless of the order it was entered into the model. Conclusions: The amount of current experience with functional tasks is not a rate-limiter of the relationships between neurocognition and functional capacity but does account for some previously unexplained variance in the functional capacity-everyday functioning relationship. These findings underscore the importance of neurocognitive deficits as they relate to functional capacity in schizophrenia, and suggest an incremental functional cost of limited experience with independent living.

KW - Adaptive functioning

KW - Cognition

KW - Outcome

KW - Schizophrenia

KW - Skill acquisition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892844680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892844680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2013.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2013.08.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 23978775

AN - SCOPUS:84892844680

VL - 152

SP - 430

EP - 434

JO - Schizophrenia Research

JF - Schizophrenia Research

SN - 0920-9964

IS - 2-3

ER -