Negative life events, social support, and depression in three personality types

Robert McMahon, L. L. Schram, R. S. Davidson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to test hypotheses relating to direct effects models of life stress and social support, and the stress-buffering effects model of social support, in relation to depression within dependent, detached ambivalent, and independent personality groups. A secondary purpose was to determine if there were theoretically predicted differences among these three personality groups in level of depression. Results of this investigation revealed that detached/ambivalent personalities, in this mixed inpatient sample, were significantly more likely to report clinically relevant depression than dependent and independent personalities. Both detached/ambivalent and dependent personality types reported higher levels of depression under conditions of high stress than low stress. No evidence was found to support predictions relating to directly beneficial effects, or to beneficial stress-buffering effects, of social support in relation to depression in the dependent personality group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-254
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Personality Disorders
Volume7
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Social Support
Personality
Depression
Psychological Stress
Inpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Negative life events, social support, and depression in three personality types. / McMahon, Robert; Schram, L. L.; Davidson, R. S.

In: Journal of Personality Disorders, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.01.1993, p. 241-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d675f39ea794eaaae1b77c3f92ac3a9,
title = "Negative life events, social support, and depression in three personality types",
abstract = "The main purpose of this study was to test hypotheses relating to direct effects models of life stress and social support, and the stress-buffering effects model of social support, in relation to depression within dependent, detached ambivalent, and independent personality groups. A secondary purpose was to determine if there were theoretically predicted differences among these three personality groups in level of depression. Results of this investigation revealed that detached/ambivalent personalities, in this mixed inpatient sample, were significantly more likely to report clinically relevant depression than dependent and independent personalities. Both detached/ambivalent and dependent personality types reported higher levels of depression under conditions of high stress than low stress. No evidence was found to support predictions relating to directly beneficial effects, or to beneficial stress-buffering effects, of social support in relation to depression in the dependent personality group.",
author = "Robert McMahon and Schram, {L. L.} and Davidson, {R. S.}",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "241--254",
journal = "Journal of Personality Disorders",
issn = "0885-579X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negative life events, social support, and depression in three personality types

AU - McMahon, Robert

AU - Schram, L. L.

AU - Davidson, R. S.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - The main purpose of this study was to test hypotheses relating to direct effects models of life stress and social support, and the stress-buffering effects model of social support, in relation to depression within dependent, detached ambivalent, and independent personality groups. A secondary purpose was to determine if there were theoretically predicted differences among these three personality groups in level of depression. Results of this investigation revealed that detached/ambivalent personalities, in this mixed inpatient sample, were significantly more likely to report clinically relevant depression than dependent and independent personalities. Both detached/ambivalent and dependent personality types reported higher levels of depression under conditions of high stress than low stress. No evidence was found to support predictions relating to directly beneficial effects, or to beneficial stress-buffering effects, of social support in relation to depression in the dependent personality group.

AB - The main purpose of this study was to test hypotheses relating to direct effects models of life stress and social support, and the stress-buffering effects model of social support, in relation to depression within dependent, detached ambivalent, and independent personality groups. A secondary purpose was to determine if there were theoretically predicted differences among these three personality groups in level of depression. Results of this investigation revealed that detached/ambivalent personalities, in this mixed inpatient sample, were significantly more likely to report clinically relevant depression than dependent and independent personalities. Both detached/ambivalent and dependent personality types reported higher levels of depression under conditions of high stress than low stress. No evidence was found to support predictions relating to directly beneficial effects, or to beneficial stress-buffering effects, of social support in relation to depression in the dependent personality group.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027438556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027438556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 241

EP - 254

JO - Journal of Personality Disorders

JF - Journal of Personality Disorders

SN - 0885-579X

IS - 3

ER -