Abstract
The popular murine macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7, is often used to initially screen natural products for bioactivity and to predict their potential effect in vivo or on primary cells. The cell line response is considered to reflect the potential human de novo response, and is used to evaluate the effective bioactivity of the product. Here, we compared the cytokine response of RAW 264.7 cells to shark cartilage (SC) with that of human leukocytes to determine whether the cell line response was a reliable predictor of the cytokine response one can expect from similarly stimulated human primary cells. Results not only revealed significant differences in the nature and level of TNFα produced by cells in vitro, but also showed that while the primary cell response included an upregulation in the production of IL-1β such a response was absent in RAW 264.7 cells. This suggests that had we relied on RAW 264.7 cells alone to assess the cytokine-inducing capacity of SC, the comprehensive Th1 response (shown in an earlier study) induced by SC in primary cells, consisting of release of several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, would not have been revealed. We conclude, therefore, that assays using only RAW 264.7 cells to initially screen for and assess immune reactivity of test products will not necessarily provide a comprehensive picture of the immunomodulatory properties of the substance under investigation, and can in fact be misleading with regard to the overall bioactive potential of the substance on an initial screen.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 55-58 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 4 2017 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Cytokine response
- human leukocytes
- murine cell line
- shark cartilage
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Immunology and Allergy
- Immunology
- Toxicology
- Pharmacology
Cite this
Murine RAW 264.7 cell line as an immune target : are we missing something? / Merly, Liza; Smith, Sylvia L.
In: Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology, Vol. 39, No. 2, 04.03.2017, p. 55-58.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Murine RAW 264.7 cell line as an immune target
T2 - are we missing something?
AU - Merly, Liza
AU - Smith, Sylvia L.
PY - 2017/3/4
Y1 - 2017/3/4
N2 - The popular murine macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7, is often used to initially screen natural products for bioactivity and to predict their potential effect in vivo or on primary cells. The cell line response is considered to reflect the potential human de novo response, and is used to evaluate the effective bioactivity of the product. Here, we compared the cytokine response of RAW 264.7 cells to shark cartilage (SC) with that of human leukocytes to determine whether the cell line response was a reliable predictor of the cytokine response one can expect from similarly stimulated human primary cells. Results not only revealed significant differences in the nature and level of TNFα produced by cells in vitro, but also showed that while the primary cell response included an upregulation in the production of IL-1β such a response was absent in RAW 264.7 cells. This suggests that had we relied on RAW 264.7 cells alone to assess the cytokine-inducing capacity of SC, the comprehensive Th1 response (shown in an earlier study) induced by SC in primary cells, consisting of release of several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, would not have been revealed. We conclude, therefore, that assays using only RAW 264.7 cells to initially screen for and assess immune reactivity of test products will not necessarily provide a comprehensive picture of the immunomodulatory properties of the substance under investigation, and can in fact be misleading with regard to the overall bioactive potential of the substance on an initial screen.
AB - The popular murine macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7, is often used to initially screen natural products for bioactivity and to predict their potential effect in vivo or on primary cells. The cell line response is considered to reflect the potential human de novo response, and is used to evaluate the effective bioactivity of the product. Here, we compared the cytokine response of RAW 264.7 cells to shark cartilage (SC) with that of human leukocytes to determine whether the cell line response was a reliable predictor of the cytokine response one can expect from similarly stimulated human primary cells. Results not only revealed significant differences in the nature and level of TNFα produced by cells in vitro, but also showed that while the primary cell response included an upregulation in the production of IL-1β such a response was absent in RAW 264.7 cells. This suggests that had we relied on RAW 264.7 cells alone to assess the cytokine-inducing capacity of SC, the comprehensive Th1 response (shown in an earlier study) induced by SC in primary cells, consisting of release of several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, would not have been revealed. We conclude, therefore, that assays using only RAW 264.7 cells to initially screen for and assess immune reactivity of test products will not necessarily provide a comprehensive picture of the immunomodulatory properties of the substance under investigation, and can in fact be misleading with regard to the overall bioactive potential of the substance on an initial screen.
KW - Cytokine response
KW - human leukocytes
KW - murine cell line
KW - shark cartilage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011579822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011579822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08923973.2017.1282511
DO - 10.1080/08923973.2017.1282511
M3 - Article
C2 - 28152640
AN - SCOPUS:85011579822
VL - 39
SP - 55
EP - 58
JO - Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology
JF - Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology
SN - 0892-3973
IS - 2
ER -