Multiple imputation for harmonizing longitudinal non-commensurate measures in individual participant data meta-analysis

Juned Siddique, Jerome P. Reiter, Ahnalee Brincks, Robert D. Gibbons, Catherine M. Crespi, C. Hendricks Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are many advantages to individual participant data meta-analysis for combining data from multiple studies. These advantages include greater power to detect effects, increased sample heterogeneity, and the ability to perform more sophisticated analyses than meta-analyses that rely on published results. However, a fundamental challenge is that it is unlikely that variables of interest are measured the same way in all of the studies to be combined. We propose that this situation can be viewed as a missing data problem in which some outcomes are entirely missing within some trials and use multiple imputation to fill in missing measurements. We apply our method to five longitudinal adolescent depression trials where four studies used one depression measure and the fifth study used a different depression measure. None of the five studies contained both depression measures. We describe a multiple imputation approach for filling in missing depression measures that makes use of external calibration studies in which both depression measures were used. We discuss some practical issues in developing the imputation model including taking into account treatment group and study. We present diagnostics for checking the fit of the imputation model and investigate whether external information is appropriately incorporated into the imputed values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalStatistics in Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2015

Fingerprint

Multiple Imputation
Meta-Analysis
Calibration
Imputation
Missing Data
Diagnostics
Therapeutics
Model

Keywords

  • Data fusion
  • Data synthesis
  • External data calibration
  • Individual participant data meta-analysis
  • Multiple imputation
  • Posterior predictive checking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Multiple imputation for harmonizing longitudinal non-commensurate measures in individual participant data meta-analysis. / Siddique, Juned; Reiter, Jerome P.; Brincks, Ahnalee; Gibbons, Robert D.; Crespi, Catherine M.; Brown, C. Hendricks.

In: Statistics in Medicine, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Siddique, Juned ; Reiter, Jerome P. ; Brincks, Ahnalee ; Gibbons, Robert D. ; Crespi, Catherine M. ; Brown, C. Hendricks. / Multiple imputation for harmonizing longitudinal non-commensurate measures in individual participant data meta-analysis. In: Statistics in Medicine. 2015.
@article{90a2647b33824a12b7724411f25bacdf,
title = "Multiple imputation for harmonizing longitudinal non-commensurate measures in individual participant data meta-analysis",
abstract = "There are many advantages to individual participant data meta-analysis for combining data from multiple studies. These advantages include greater power to detect effects, increased sample heterogeneity, and the ability to perform more sophisticated analyses than meta-analyses that rely on published results. However, a fundamental challenge is that it is unlikely that variables of interest are measured the same way in all of the studies to be combined. We propose that this situation can be viewed as a missing data problem in which some outcomes are entirely missing within some trials and use multiple imputation to fill in missing measurements. We apply our method to five longitudinal adolescent depression trials where four studies used one depression measure and the fifth study used a different depression measure. None of the five studies contained both depression measures. We describe a multiple imputation approach for filling in missing depression measures that makes use of external calibration studies in which both depression measures were used. We discuss some practical issues in developing the imputation model including taking into account treatment group and study. We present diagnostics for checking the fit of the imputation model and investigate whether external information is appropriately incorporated into the imputed values.",
keywords = "Data fusion, Data synthesis, External data calibration, Individual participant data meta-analysis, Multiple imputation, Posterior predictive checking",
author = "Juned Siddique and Reiter, {Jerome P.} and Ahnalee Brincks and Gibbons, {Robert D.} and Crespi, {Catherine M.} and Brown, {C. Hendricks}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1002/sim.6562",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Statistics in Medicine",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple imputation for harmonizing longitudinal non-commensurate measures in individual participant data meta-analysis

AU - Siddique, Juned

AU - Reiter, Jerome P.

AU - Brincks, Ahnalee

AU - Gibbons, Robert D.

AU - Crespi, Catherine M.

AU - Brown, C. Hendricks

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - There are many advantages to individual participant data meta-analysis for combining data from multiple studies. These advantages include greater power to detect effects, increased sample heterogeneity, and the ability to perform more sophisticated analyses than meta-analyses that rely on published results. However, a fundamental challenge is that it is unlikely that variables of interest are measured the same way in all of the studies to be combined. We propose that this situation can be viewed as a missing data problem in which some outcomes are entirely missing within some trials and use multiple imputation to fill in missing measurements. We apply our method to five longitudinal adolescent depression trials where four studies used one depression measure and the fifth study used a different depression measure. None of the five studies contained both depression measures. We describe a multiple imputation approach for filling in missing depression measures that makes use of external calibration studies in which both depression measures were used. We discuss some practical issues in developing the imputation model including taking into account treatment group and study. We present diagnostics for checking the fit of the imputation model and investigate whether external information is appropriately incorporated into the imputed values.

AB - There are many advantages to individual participant data meta-analysis for combining data from multiple studies. These advantages include greater power to detect effects, increased sample heterogeneity, and the ability to perform more sophisticated analyses than meta-analyses that rely on published results. However, a fundamental challenge is that it is unlikely that variables of interest are measured the same way in all of the studies to be combined. We propose that this situation can be viewed as a missing data problem in which some outcomes are entirely missing within some trials and use multiple imputation to fill in missing measurements. We apply our method to five longitudinal adolescent depression trials where four studies used one depression measure and the fifth study used a different depression measure. None of the five studies contained both depression measures. We describe a multiple imputation approach for filling in missing depression measures that makes use of external calibration studies in which both depression measures were used. We discuss some practical issues in developing the imputation model including taking into account treatment group and study. We present diagnostics for checking the fit of the imputation model and investigate whether external information is appropriately incorporated into the imputed values.

KW - Data fusion

KW - Data synthesis

KW - External data calibration

KW - Individual participant data meta-analysis

KW - Multiple imputation

KW - Posterior predictive checking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932129569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932129569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sim.6562

DO - 10.1002/sim.6562

M3 - Article

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

SN - 0277-6715

ER -