Multicenter US Clinical Trial with an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes

Harold C. Pillsbury, Margaret T. DIllon, Craig A. Buchman, Hinrich Staecker, Sandra M. Prentiss, Michael J. Ruckenstein, Douglas C. Bigelow, Fred F. Telischi, DIane M. Martinez, Christina L. Runge, David R. Friedland, Nikolas H. Blevins, Jannine B. Larky, George Alexiades, David M. Kaylie, Peter S. Roland, Richard T. Miyamoto, Douglas D. Backous, Frank M. Warren, Hussam K. El-KashlanHeidi K. Slager, Carisa Reyes, Allison I. Racey, Oliver F. Adunka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations


Objective: To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the MED-EL Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System, for adults with residual low-frequency hearing and severe-to-profound hearing loss in the mid to high frequencies. Study Design: Prospective, repeated measures. Setting: Multicenter, hospital. Patients: Seventy-three subjects implanted with PULSAR or SONATA cochlear implants with FLEX 24 electrode arrays. Intervention: Subjects were fit postoperatively with an audio processor, combining electric stimulation and acoustic amplification. Main Outcome Measures: Unaided thresholds were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postactivation. Speech perception was assessed at these intervals using City University of New York sentences in noise and consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet. Subjective benefit was assessed at these intervals via the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and Hearing Device Satisfaction Scale questionnaires. Results: Sixty-seven of 73 subjects (92%) completed outcome measures for all study intervals. Of those 67 subjects, 79% experienced less than a 30 dB HL low-frequency pure-tone average (250-1000 Hz) shift, and 97% were able to use the acoustic unit at 12 months postactivation. In the EAS condition, 94% of subjects performed similarly to or better than their preoperative performance on City University of New York sentences in noise at 12 months postactivation, with 85% demonstrating improvement. Ninety-seven percent of subjects performed similarly or better on consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet, with 84% demonstrating improvement. Conclusion: The MED-EL EAS System is a safe and effective treatment option for adults with normal hearing to moderate sensorineural hearing loss in the low frequencies and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in the high frequencies who do not benefit from traditional amplification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-305
Number of pages7
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018


  • Cochlear implant
  • Electric-acoustic stimulation
  • Hearing preservation
  • Hybrid cochlear implant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Clinical Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'Multicenter US Clinical Trial with an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this