Multi-causal and integrated assessment of sustainability: The case of agriculturization in the Argentine Pampas

David Manuel-Navarrete, Gilberto C. Gallopín, Mariela Blanco, Martín Díaz-Zorita, Diego O. Ferraro, Hilda Herzer, Pedro Laterra, María R. Murmis, Guillermo P Podesta, Jorge Rabinovich, Emilio H. Satorre, Filemón Torres, Ernesto F. Viglizzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessing the sustainability of complex development processes requires multi-causal and integrated analyses. We develop a system-based methodology, rooted in interdisciplinary discussion and consensus building between 15 experts, to construct a multi-causal diagram which examines the sustainability of the Argentine Pampaś process of agriculturization. The resulting diagram includes 25 factors and provides a big-picture of the multiple dimensions and interrelations affecting sustainability. According to this examination, the increasing concentration of production and the incorporation of technological innovations, triggered by economic and institutional factors, are the cause of environmental distresses and social changes, whose consequences for sustainability are still highly disputed. Nevertheless, the symptoms of both environmental and social unsustainability are more evident in the case of the extra-Pampean regions than in the Pampas. This suggests that the Pampean agriculture model should not be transferred to these regions without substantial modifications. The experts did not reach consensus on whether the agriculturization process is overall sustainable or unsustainable. Lack of consensus revolved mainly around opposing perspectives regarding the significance of the threats to environmental sustainability. The magnitude of socio-distributive unbalance and loss of rural jobs were also contentious. Yet, the paper shows how the exercise of building a joint causal diagram was undoubtedly helpful for linking piece-meal disciplinary facts, brought in from all fronts, into a comprehensive and coherent picture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)621-638
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironment, Development and Sustainability
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

sustainability
diagram
expert
institutional factors
meals
social change
technical innovation
economic factors
environmental change
innovation
agriculture
Integrated assessment
Sustainability
threat
examination
cause
methodology
lack
Diagrams
economics

Keywords

  • Agriculturization
  • Integrated assessment
  • Multi-causal diagrams
  • Pampas
  • Sustainability
  • Syndromes of global change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Manuel-Navarrete, D., Gallopín, G. C., Blanco, M., Díaz-Zorita, M., Ferraro, D. O., Herzer, H., ... Viglizzo, E. F. (2009). Multi-causal and integrated assessment of sustainability: The case of agriculturization in the Argentine Pampas. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11(3), 621-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-007-9133-0

Multi-causal and integrated assessment of sustainability : The case of agriculturization in the Argentine Pampas. / Manuel-Navarrete, David; Gallopín, Gilberto C.; Blanco, Mariela; Díaz-Zorita, Martín; Ferraro, Diego O.; Herzer, Hilda; Laterra, Pedro; Murmis, María R.; Podesta, Guillermo P; Rabinovich, Jorge; Satorre, Emilio H.; Torres, Filemón; Viglizzo, Ernesto F.

In: Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 3, 06.2009, p. 621-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Manuel-Navarrete, D, Gallopín, GC, Blanco, M, Díaz-Zorita, M, Ferraro, DO, Herzer, H, Laterra, P, Murmis, MR, Podesta, GP, Rabinovich, J, Satorre, EH, Torres, F & Viglizzo, EF 2009, 'Multi-causal and integrated assessment of sustainability: The case of agriculturization in the Argentine Pampas', Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 621-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-007-9133-0
Manuel-Navarrete, David ; Gallopín, Gilberto C. ; Blanco, Mariela ; Díaz-Zorita, Martín ; Ferraro, Diego O. ; Herzer, Hilda ; Laterra, Pedro ; Murmis, María R. ; Podesta, Guillermo P ; Rabinovich, Jorge ; Satorre, Emilio H. ; Torres, Filemón ; Viglizzo, Ernesto F. / Multi-causal and integrated assessment of sustainability : The case of agriculturization in the Argentine Pampas. In: Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2009 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 621-638.
@article{e436bb28f75749ac94c73612addf3b3f,
title = "Multi-causal and integrated assessment of sustainability: The case of agriculturization in the Argentine Pampas",
abstract = "Assessing the sustainability of complex development processes requires multi-causal and integrated analyses. We develop a system-based methodology, rooted in interdisciplinary discussion and consensus building between 15 experts, to construct a multi-causal diagram which examines the sustainability of the Argentine Pampaś process of agriculturization. The resulting diagram includes 25 factors and provides a big-picture of the multiple dimensions and interrelations affecting sustainability. According to this examination, the increasing concentration of production and the incorporation of technological innovations, triggered by economic and institutional factors, are the cause of environmental distresses and social changes, whose consequences for sustainability are still highly disputed. Nevertheless, the symptoms of both environmental and social unsustainability are more evident in the case of the extra-Pampean regions than in the Pampas. This suggests that the Pampean agriculture model should not be transferred to these regions without substantial modifications. The experts did not reach consensus on whether the agriculturization process is overall sustainable or unsustainable. Lack of consensus revolved mainly around opposing perspectives regarding the significance of the threats to environmental sustainability. The magnitude of socio-distributive unbalance and loss of rural jobs were also contentious. Yet, the paper shows how the exercise of building a joint causal diagram was undoubtedly helpful for linking piece-meal disciplinary facts, brought in from all fronts, into a comprehensive and coherent picture.",
keywords = "Agriculturization, Integrated assessment, Multi-causal diagrams, Pampas, Sustainability, Syndromes of global change",
author = "David Manuel-Navarrete and Gallop{\'i}n, {Gilberto C.} and Mariela Blanco and Mart{\'i}n D{\'i}az-Zorita and Ferraro, {Diego O.} and Hilda Herzer and Pedro Laterra and Murmis, {Mar{\'i}a R.} and Podesta, {Guillermo P} and Jorge Rabinovich and Satorre, {Emilio H.} and Filem{\'o}n Torres and Viglizzo, {Ernesto F.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10668-007-9133-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "621--638",
journal = "Environment, Development and Sustainability",
issn = "1387-585X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-causal and integrated assessment of sustainability

T2 - The case of agriculturization in the Argentine Pampas

AU - Manuel-Navarrete, David

AU - Gallopín, Gilberto C.

AU - Blanco, Mariela

AU - Díaz-Zorita, Martín

AU - Ferraro, Diego O.

AU - Herzer, Hilda

AU - Laterra, Pedro

AU - Murmis, María R.

AU - Podesta, Guillermo P

AU - Rabinovich, Jorge

AU - Satorre, Emilio H.

AU - Torres, Filemón

AU - Viglizzo, Ernesto F.

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Assessing the sustainability of complex development processes requires multi-causal and integrated analyses. We develop a system-based methodology, rooted in interdisciplinary discussion and consensus building between 15 experts, to construct a multi-causal diagram which examines the sustainability of the Argentine Pampaś process of agriculturization. The resulting diagram includes 25 factors and provides a big-picture of the multiple dimensions and interrelations affecting sustainability. According to this examination, the increasing concentration of production and the incorporation of technological innovations, triggered by economic and institutional factors, are the cause of environmental distresses and social changes, whose consequences for sustainability are still highly disputed. Nevertheless, the symptoms of both environmental and social unsustainability are more evident in the case of the extra-Pampean regions than in the Pampas. This suggests that the Pampean agriculture model should not be transferred to these regions without substantial modifications. The experts did not reach consensus on whether the agriculturization process is overall sustainable or unsustainable. Lack of consensus revolved mainly around opposing perspectives regarding the significance of the threats to environmental sustainability. The magnitude of socio-distributive unbalance and loss of rural jobs were also contentious. Yet, the paper shows how the exercise of building a joint causal diagram was undoubtedly helpful for linking piece-meal disciplinary facts, brought in from all fronts, into a comprehensive and coherent picture.

AB - Assessing the sustainability of complex development processes requires multi-causal and integrated analyses. We develop a system-based methodology, rooted in interdisciplinary discussion and consensus building between 15 experts, to construct a multi-causal diagram which examines the sustainability of the Argentine Pampaś process of agriculturization. The resulting diagram includes 25 factors and provides a big-picture of the multiple dimensions and interrelations affecting sustainability. According to this examination, the increasing concentration of production and the incorporation of technological innovations, triggered by economic and institutional factors, are the cause of environmental distresses and social changes, whose consequences for sustainability are still highly disputed. Nevertheless, the symptoms of both environmental and social unsustainability are more evident in the case of the extra-Pampean regions than in the Pampas. This suggests that the Pampean agriculture model should not be transferred to these regions without substantial modifications. The experts did not reach consensus on whether the agriculturization process is overall sustainable or unsustainable. Lack of consensus revolved mainly around opposing perspectives regarding the significance of the threats to environmental sustainability. The magnitude of socio-distributive unbalance and loss of rural jobs were also contentious. Yet, the paper shows how the exercise of building a joint causal diagram was undoubtedly helpful for linking piece-meal disciplinary facts, brought in from all fronts, into a comprehensive and coherent picture.

KW - Agriculturization

KW - Integrated assessment

KW - Multi-causal diagrams

KW - Pampas

KW - Sustainability

KW - Syndromes of global change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349201196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349201196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10668-007-9133-0

DO - 10.1007/s10668-007-9133-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67349201196

VL - 11

SP - 621

EP - 638

JO - Environment, Development and Sustainability

JF - Environment, Development and Sustainability

SN - 1387-585X

IS - 3

ER -