'Movement' in work status after pain facility treatment

David A Fishbain, Robert B. Cutler, Hubert Rosomoff, Tarek Khalil, Elsayed Abdel-Moty, Soha Sadek, Ahmed Zaki, Alan Saltzman, Joy Jarrett, Gloria Martinez, Renee Steele-Rosomoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. This was a randomized prospective follow-up study of pain facility treatment of chronic pain patients with low back pain, with return to work and work capacity as the outcome measures. Objectives. To determine if after pain facility treatment chronic pain patients 'move' in and out of work and in their work capacity; to determine the patterns of 'movement;' and to determine the post-pain facility treatment follow-up sampling time points that would maximize the number of chronic pain patients correctly classified according to their final work and work capacity status. Summary of Background Data. Past research and empiric observation have indicated that chronic pain patients may 'move' after pain facility treatment in and out of work and in their job work capacity. Such 'movement' can affect the results of outcome studies. Methods. Two hundred thirty-six consecutive chronic pain patients who fit study selection criteria were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after pain facility treatment for determination of work and work capacity status and separated according to the pattern of movement. Stepwise discriminant analysis was used to answer the study objectives. 'Movement' in and out of work for these chronic pain patients also was compared with the US general population. Results. Chronic pain patients demonstrated eight work and four work capacity movement patterns. The 24- and 1-month time points predicted final work status correctly for 97.0% and 77.0% of the chronic pain patients, respectively, whereas the most significant predictor for correct work capacity status was the 24-month point. The annual percentage change in employment status for these chronic pain patients was more than in the US general population. Conclusions. Because chronic pain patients 'move' in and out of employment and for work capacity status after pain facility treatment, future outcome studies using these measures will have to consider carefully the impact of 'movement' on their results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2662-2669
Number of pages8
JournalSpine
Volume21
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 1996

Fingerprint

Pain
Chronic Pain
Therapeutics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Return to Work
Discriminant Analysis
Low Back Pain
Patient Selection
Population
Observation
Research

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • movement
  • prediction
  • treatment
  • work

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Fishbain, D. A., Cutler, R. B., Rosomoff, H., Khalil, T., Abdel-Moty, E., Sadek, S., ... Steele-Rosomoff, R. (1996). 'Movement' in work status after pain facility treatment. Spine, 21(22), 2662-2669. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199611150-00016

'Movement' in work status after pain facility treatment. / Fishbain, David A; Cutler, Robert B.; Rosomoff, Hubert; Khalil, Tarek; Abdel-Moty, Elsayed; Sadek, Soha; Zaki, Ahmed; Saltzman, Alan; Jarrett, Joy; Martinez, Gloria; Steele-Rosomoff, Renee.

In: Spine, Vol. 21, No. 22, 15.11.1996, p. 2662-2669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fishbain, DA, Cutler, RB, Rosomoff, H, Khalil, T, Abdel-Moty, E, Sadek, S, Zaki, A, Saltzman, A, Jarrett, J, Martinez, G & Steele-Rosomoff, R 1996, ''Movement' in work status after pain facility treatment', Spine, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 2662-2669. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199611150-00016
Fishbain DA, Cutler RB, Rosomoff H, Khalil T, Abdel-Moty E, Sadek S et al. 'Movement' in work status after pain facility treatment. Spine. 1996 Nov 15;21(22):2662-2669. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199611150-00016
Fishbain, David A ; Cutler, Robert B. ; Rosomoff, Hubert ; Khalil, Tarek ; Abdel-Moty, Elsayed ; Sadek, Soha ; Zaki, Ahmed ; Saltzman, Alan ; Jarrett, Joy ; Martinez, Gloria ; Steele-Rosomoff, Renee. / 'Movement' in work status after pain facility treatment. In: Spine. 1996 ; Vol. 21, No. 22. pp. 2662-2669.
@article{cfa68d682dfe43a686617e2d5e43948a,
title = "'Movement' in work status after pain facility treatment",
abstract = "Study Design. This was a randomized prospective follow-up study of pain facility treatment of chronic pain patients with low back pain, with return to work and work capacity as the outcome measures. Objectives. To determine if after pain facility treatment chronic pain patients 'move' in and out of work and in their work capacity; to determine the patterns of 'movement;' and to determine the post-pain facility treatment follow-up sampling time points that would maximize the number of chronic pain patients correctly classified according to their final work and work capacity status. Summary of Background Data. Past research and empiric observation have indicated that chronic pain patients may 'move' after pain facility treatment in and out of work and in their job work capacity. Such 'movement' can affect the results of outcome studies. Methods. Two hundred thirty-six consecutive chronic pain patients who fit study selection criteria were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after pain facility treatment for determination of work and work capacity status and separated according to the pattern of movement. Stepwise discriminant analysis was used to answer the study objectives. 'Movement' in and out of work for these chronic pain patients also was compared with the US general population. Results. Chronic pain patients demonstrated eight work and four work capacity movement patterns. The 24- and 1-month time points predicted final work status correctly for 97.0{\%} and 77.0{\%} of the chronic pain patients, respectively, whereas the most significant predictor for correct work capacity status was the 24-month point. The annual percentage change in employment status for these chronic pain patients was more than in the US general population. Conclusions. Because chronic pain patients 'move' in and out of employment and for work capacity status after pain facility treatment, future outcome studies using these measures will have to consider carefully the impact of 'movement' on their results.",
keywords = "chronic pain, movement, prediction, treatment, work",
author = "Fishbain, {David A} and Cutler, {Robert B.} and Hubert Rosomoff and Tarek Khalil and Elsayed Abdel-Moty and Soha Sadek and Ahmed Zaki and Alan Saltzman and Joy Jarrett and Gloria Martinez and Renee Steele-Rosomoff",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-199611150-00016",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "2662--2669",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Movement' in work status after pain facility treatment

AU - Fishbain, David A

AU - Cutler, Robert B.

AU - Rosomoff, Hubert

AU - Khalil, Tarek

AU - Abdel-Moty, Elsayed

AU - Sadek, Soha

AU - Zaki, Ahmed

AU - Saltzman, Alan

AU - Jarrett, Joy

AU - Martinez, Gloria

AU - Steele-Rosomoff, Renee

PY - 1996/11/15

Y1 - 1996/11/15

N2 - Study Design. This was a randomized prospective follow-up study of pain facility treatment of chronic pain patients with low back pain, with return to work and work capacity as the outcome measures. Objectives. To determine if after pain facility treatment chronic pain patients 'move' in and out of work and in their work capacity; to determine the patterns of 'movement;' and to determine the post-pain facility treatment follow-up sampling time points that would maximize the number of chronic pain patients correctly classified according to their final work and work capacity status. Summary of Background Data. Past research and empiric observation have indicated that chronic pain patients may 'move' after pain facility treatment in and out of work and in their job work capacity. Such 'movement' can affect the results of outcome studies. Methods. Two hundred thirty-six consecutive chronic pain patients who fit study selection criteria were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after pain facility treatment for determination of work and work capacity status and separated according to the pattern of movement. Stepwise discriminant analysis was used to answer the study objectives. 'Movement' in and out of work for these chronic pain patients also was compared with the US general population. Results. Chronic pain patients demonstrated eight work and four work capacity movement patterns. The 24- and 1-month time points predicted final work status correctly for 97.0% and 77.0% of the chronic pain patients, respectively, whereas the most significant predictor for correct work capacity status was the 24-month point. The annual percentage change in employment status for these chronic pain patients was more than in the US general population. Conclusions. Because chronic pain patients 'move' in and out of employment and for work capacity status after pain facility treatment, future outcome studies using these measures will have to consider carefully the impact of 'movement' on their results.

AB - Study Design. This was a randomized prospective follow-up study of pain facility treatment of chronic pain patients with low back pain, with return to work and work capacity as the outcome measures. Objectives. To determine if after pain facility treatment chronic pain patients 'move' in and out of work and in their work capacity; to determine the patterns of 'movement;' and to determine the post-pain facility treatment follow-up sampling time points that would maximize the number of chronic pain patients correctly classified according to their final work and work capacity status. Summary of Background Data. Past research and empiric observation have indicated that chronic pain patients may 'move' after pain facility treatment in and out of work and in their job work capacity. Such 'movement' can affect the results of outcome studies. Methods. Two hundred thirty-six consecutive chronic pain patients who fit study selection criteria were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after pain facility treatment for determination of work and work capacity status and separated according to the pattern of movement. Stepwise discriminant analysis was used to answer the study objectives. 'Movement' in and out of work for these chronic pain patients also was compared with the US general population. Results. Chronic pain patients demonstrated eight work and four work capacity movement patterns. The 24- and 1-month time points predicted final work status correctly for 97.0% and 77.0% of the chronic pain patients, respectively, whereas the most significant predictor for correct work capacity status was the 24-month point. The annual percentage change in employment status for these chronic pain patients was more than in the US general population. Conclusions. Because chronic pain patients 'move' in and out of employment and for work capacity status after pain facility treatment, future outcome studies using these measures will have to consider carefully the impact of 'movement' on their results.

KW - chronic pain

KW - movement

KW - prediction

KW - treatment

KW - work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10544226575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10544226575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-199611150-00016

DO - 10.1097/00007632-199611150-00016

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 2662

EP - 2669

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 22

ER -