Most ‘global’ reviews of species’ responses to climate change are not truly global

Kenneth Feeley, James T. Stroud, Timothy M. Perez

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is critical that we understand the effects of climate change on natural systems if we ever hope to predict or mitigate consequent changes in diversity and ecosystem function. In order to identify coherent ‘fingerprints’ of climate change across Earth's terrestrial and marine ecosystems, various reviews have been conducted to synthesize studies of climate change impacts on individual species, assemblages and systems. These reviews help to make information about climate change impacts accessible for researchers as well as for the general public and policymakers. As such, these reviews can be highly influential in setting the direction of policy and research. Unfortunately, due to limited data availability, the majority of reviews of climate change impacts suffer from severe taxonomic and geographic biases. In particular, tropical and marine systems are grossly underrepresented, as are plants and endothermic animals. These biases may preclude a comprehensive understanding of how climate change is affecting Earth's natural systems at a global scale. In order to advance our understanding of climate change impacts on species and ecosystems, we need to first assess the types of data that are and are not available and then correct these biases through directed studies and initiatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-234
Number of pages4
JournalDiversity and Distributions
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

climate change
ecosystems
ecosystem function
terrestrial ecosystem
marine ecosystem
researchers
ecosystem
animal
animals

Keywords

  • climate change
  • climate change responses
  • geographic bias
  • global review
  • marine
  • taxonomic bias
  • terrestrial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Most ‘global’ reviews of species’ responses to climate change are not truly global. / Feeley, Kenneth; Stroud, James T.; Perez, Timothy M.

In: Diversity and Distributions, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 231-234.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

@article{9d6a6c437b2d4fa8a701c1d8d8e30c3c,
title = "Most ‘global’ reviews of species’ responses to climate change are not truly global",
abstract = "It is critical that we understand the effects of climate change on natural systems if we ever hope to predict or mitigate consequent changes in diversity and ecosystem function. In order to identify coherent ‘fingerprints’ of climate change across Earth's terrestrial and marine ecosystems, various reviews have been conducted to synthesize studies of climate change impacts on individual species, assemblages and systems. These reviews help to make information about climate change impacts accessible for researchers as well as for the general public and policymakers. As such, these reviews can be highly influential in setting the direction of policy and research. Unfortunately, due to limited data availability, the majority of reviews of climate change impacts suffer from severe taxonomic and geographic biases. In particular, tropical and marine systems are grossly underrepresented, as are plants and endothermic animals. These biases may preclude a comprehensive understanding of how climate change is affecting Earth's natural systems at a global scale. In order to advance our understanding of climate change impacts on species and ecosystems, we need to first assess the types of data that are and are not available and then correct these biases through directed studies and initiatives.",
keywords = "climate change, climate change responses, geographic bias, global review, marine, taxonomic bias, terrestrial",
author = "Kenneth Feeley and Stroud, {James T.} and Perez, {Timothy M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ddi.12517",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "231--234",
journal = "Diversity and Distributions",
issn = "1366-9516",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Most ‘global’ reviews of species’ responses to climate change are not truly global

AU - Feeley, Kenneth

AU - Stroud, James T.

AU - Perez, Timothy M.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - It is critical that we understand the effects of climate change on natural systems if we ever hope to predict or mitigate consequent changes in diversity and ecosystem function. In order to identify coherent ‘fingerprints’ of climate change across Earth's terrestrial and marine ecosystems, various reviews have been conducted to synthesize studies of climate change impacts on individual species, assemblages and systems. These reviews help to make information about climate change impacts accessible for researchers as well as for the general public and policymakers. As such, these reviews can be highly influential in setting the direction of policy and research. Unfortunately, due to limited data availability, the majority of reviews of climate change impacts suffer from severe taxonomic and geographic biases. In particular, tropical and marine systems are grossly underrepresented, as are plants and endothermic animals. These biases may preclude a comprehensive understanding of how climate change is affecting Earth's natural systems at a global scale. In order to advance our understanding of climate change impacts on species and ecosystems, we need to first assess the types of data that are and are not available and then correct these biases through directed studies and initiatives.

AB - It is critical that we understand the effects of climate change on natural systems if we ever hope to predict or mitigate consequent changes in diversity and ecosystem function. In order to identify coherent ‘fingerprints’ of climate change across Earth's terrestrial and marine ecosystems, various reviews have been conducted to synthesize studies of climate change impacts on individual species, assemblages and systems. These reviews help to make information about climate change impacts accessible for researchers as well as for the general public and policymakers. As such, these reviews can be highly influential in setting the direction of policy and research. Unfortunately, due to limited data availability, the majority of reviews of climate change impacts suffer from severe taxonomic and geographic biases. In particular, tropical and marine systems are grossly underrepresented, as are plants and endothermic animals. These biases may preclude a comprehensive understanding of how climate change is affecting Earth's natural systems at a global scale. In order to advance our understanding of climate change impacts on species and ecosystems, we need to first assess the types of data that are and are not available and then correct these biases through directed studies and initiatives.

KW - climate change

KW - climate change responses

KW - geographic bias

KW - global review

KW - marine

KW - taxonomic bias

KW - terrestrial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006699362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006699362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ddi.12517

DO - 10.1111/ddi.12517

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:85006699362

VL - 23

SP - 231

EP - 234

JO - Diversity and Distributions

JF - Diversity and Distributions

SN - 1366-9516

IS - 3

ER -