Morbidity from bone harvest in major jaw reconstruction: A randomized trial comparing the lateral anterior and posterior approaches to the llium

Robert E. Marx, Marco J. Morales

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

189 Scopus citations

Abstract

A randomized prospective study was done to compare bone harvest morbidity in the lateral anterior versus the lateral posterior approach to the ilium. One hundred consecutive patients, requiring at least 60 ml of bone for continuity defects of the mandible, were randomly placed in equal groups in these two categories. Assessment of morbidity vectors included pain, ambulation, seroma, and blood loss. Results, in part, identified the posterior ilium harvest to have decreased morbidity in all variables. The reduced morbidity encountered, and the greater quantity of available bone, are both related to the anatomic differences between the anterior and posterior ilium. Accepted disadvantages were increased operating time and the need to turn the patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-203
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Morbidity from bone harvest in major jaw reconstruction: A randomized trial comparing the lateral anterior and posterior approaches to the llium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this