Mixed speech: When speech is both private and governmental

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Speech is generally considered to be either private or governmental, and this dichotomy is embedded in First Amendment jurisprudence. However, speech is often neither purely private nor purely governmental but rather a combination of the two. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has not yet recognized mixed speech as a distinct category of speech. This Article suggests considerations for identifying mixed speech and exposes the shortcomings of the current approach of classifying all speech as either private or governmental when determining whether viewpoint restrictions pass First Amendment muster. Treating mixed speech as government speech gives short shrift to the free speech interests of speakers and audiences. According it private speech status overlooks compelling state interests, including the need to avoid establishment clause violations. This Article concludes that a better approach to mixed speech is to subject viewpoint restrictions to intermediate scrutiny. This will allow a more nuanced and transparent balancing of interests than the present either-or approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)605-692
Number of pages88
JournalNew York University Law Review
Volume83
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mixed speech: When speech is both private and governmental'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this