Misinterpretations of the "cone of uncertainty" in Florida during the 2004 hurricane season

Kenneth Broad, Anthony Leiserowitz, Jessica Weinkle, Marissa Steketee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews the evolution, communication, and differing interpretations of the National Hurricane Center's "cone of uncertainty" hurricane forecast graphic. It concludes with a discussion of this graphic from the perspective of risk communication theory. The 2004 hurricane season, in which five named storms struck Florida, demonstrated that hurricane forecast graphics, despite admirable attempts by the forecast community to make user-friendly products, are still subject to misinterpretation by many members of the public. This exploratory analysis draws upon interviews with key government officials and media figures, archival research of Florida newspapers, analysis of 962 public comments on the National Hurricane Center's cone of uncertainty graphic, a separate multiagency study of 2004 hurricane behavior, and relevant risk communication literature, to identify several characteristics of this graphic that likely contribute to public misinterpretation. Forecast providers should consider more formal, rigorous pretesting of forecast graphics, using standard social science techniques, in order to minimize the probability of misinterpretation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)651-667
Number of pages17
JournalBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Volume88
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

hurricane
forecast
communication
public
analysis
risk communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Misinterpretations of the "cone of uncertainty" in Florida during the 2004 hurricane season. / Broad, Kenneth; Leiserowitz, Anthony; Weinkle, Jessica; Steketee, Marissa.

In: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 88, No. 5, 05.2007, p. 651-667.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Broad, Kenneth ; Leiserowitz, Anthony ; Weinkle, Jessica ; Steketee, Marissa. / Misinterpretations of the "cone of uncertainty" in Florida during the 2004 hurricane season. In: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2007 ; Vol. 88, No. 5. pp. 651-667.
@article{bccad214d89542f5a2f0afc936de5c46,
title = "Misinterpretations of the {"}cone of uncertainty{"} in Florida during the 2004 hurricane season",
abstract = "This article reviews the evolution, communication, and differing interpretations of the National Hurricane Center's {"}cone of uncertainty{"} hurricane forecast graphic. It concludes with a discussion of this graphic from the perspective of risk communication theory. The 2004 hurricane season, in which five named storms struck Florida, demonstrated that hurricane forecast graphics, despite admirable attempts by the forecast community to make user-friendly products, are still subject to misinterpretation by many members of the public. This exploratory analysis draws upon interviews with key government officials and media figures, archival research of Florida newspapers, analysis of 962 public comments on the National Hurricane Center's cone of uncertainty graphic, a separate multiagency study of 2004 hurricane behavior, and relevant risk communication literature, to identify several characteristics of this graphic that likely contribute to public misinterpretation. Forecast providers should consider more formal, rigorous pretesting of forecast graphics, using standard social science techniques, in order to minimize the probability of misinterpretation.",
author = "Kenneth Broad and Anthony Leiserowitz and Jessica Weinkle and Marissa Steketee",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1175/BAMS-88-5-651",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "651--667",
journal = "Earth Interactions",
issn = "0003-0007",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Misinterpretations of the "cone of uncertainty" in Florida during the 2004 hurricane season

AU - Broad, Kenneth

AU - Leiserowitz, Anthony

AU - Weinkle, Jessica

AU - Steketee, Marissa

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - This article reviews the evolution, communication, and differing interpretations of the National Hurricane Center's "cone of uncertainty" hurricane forecast graphic. It concludes with a discussion of this graphic from the perspective of risk communication theory. The 2004 hurricane season, in which five named storms struck Florida, demonstrated that hurricane forecast graphics, despite admirable attempts by the forecast community to make user-friendly products, are still subject to misinterpretation by many members of the public. This exploratory analysis draws upon interviews with key government officials and media figures, archival research of Florida newspapers, analysis of 962 public comments on the National Hurricane Center's cone of uncertainty graphic, a separate multiagency study of 2004 hurricane behavior, and relevant risk communication literature, to identify several characteristics of this graphic that likely contribute to public misinterpretation. Forecast providers should consider more formal, rigorous pretesting of forecast graphics, using standard social science techniques, in order to minimize the probability of misinterpretation.

AB - This article reviews the evolution, communication, and differing interpretations of the National Hurricane Center's "cone of uncertainty" hurricane forecast graphic. It concludes with a discussion of this graphic from the perspective of risk communication theory. The 2004 hurricane season, in which five named storms struck Florida, demonstrated that hurricane forecast graphics, despite admirable attempts by the forecast community to make user-friendly products, are still subject to misinterpretation by many members of the public. This exploratory analysis draws upon interviews with key government officials and media figures, archival research of Florida newspapers, analysis of 962 public comments on the National Hurricane Center's cone of uncertainty graphic, a separate multiagency study of 2004 hurricane behavior, and relevant risk communication literature, to identify several characteristics of this graphic that likely contribute to public misinterpretation. Forecast providers should consider more formal, rigorous pretesting of forecast graphics, using standard social science techniques, in order to minimize the probability of misinterpretation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250855140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250855140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/BAMS-88-5-651

DO - 10.1175/BAMS-88-5-651

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34250855140

VL - 88

SP - 651

EP - 667

JO - Earth Interactions

JF - Earth Interactions

SN - 0003-0007

IS - 5

ER -