Minimum information about a spinal cord injury experiment: A proposed reporting standard for spinal cord injury experiments

Vance Lemmon, Adam R. Ferguson, Phillip G. Popovich, Xiao Ming Xu, Diane M. Snow, Michihiro Igarashi, Christine E. Beattie, John Bixby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The lack of reproducibility in many areas of experimental science has a number of causes, including a lack of transparency and precision in the description of experimental approaches. This has far-reaching consequences, including wasted resources and slowing of progress. Additionally, the large number of laboratories around the world publishing articles on a given topic make it difficult, if not impossible, for individual researchers to read all of the relevant literature. Consequently, centralized databases are needed to facilitate the generation of new hypotheses for testing. One strategy to improve transparency in experimental description, and to allow the development of frameworks for computer-readable knowledge repositories, is the adoption of uniform reporting standards, such as common data elements (data elements used in multiple clinical studies) and minimum information standards. This article describes a minimum information standard for spinal cord injury (SCI) experiments, its major elements, and the approaches used to develop it. Transparent reporting standards for experiments using animal models of human SCI aim to reduce inherent bias and increase experimental value.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1354-1361
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume31
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2014

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Animal Models
Research Personnel
Databases

Keywords

  • axonal injury
  • axonal regeneration
  • MIASCI
  • spinal cord injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Minimum information about a spinal cord injury experiment : A proposed reporting standard for spinal cord injury experiments. / Lemmon, Vance; Ferguson, Adam R.; Popovich, Phillip G.; Xu, Xiao Ming; Snow, Diane M.; Igarashi, Michihiro; Beattie, Christine E.; Bixby, John.

In: Journal of Neurotrauma, Vol. 31, No. 15, 01.08.2014, p. 1354-1361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lemmon, Vance ; Ferguson, Adam R. ; Popovich, Phillip G. ; Xu, Xiao Ming ; Snow, Diane M. ; Igarashi, Michihiro ; Beattie, Christine E. ; Bixby, John. / Minimum information about a spinal cord injury experiment : A proposed reporting standard for spinal cord injury experiments. In: Journal of Neurotrauma. 2014 ; Vol. 31, No. 15. pp. 1354-1361.
@article{5fbe169f110d4d9a86834254a54932f9,
title = "Minimum information about a spinal cord injury experiment: A proposed reporting standard for spinal cord injury experiments",
abstract = "The lack of reproducibility in many areas of experimental science has a number of causes, including a lack of transparency and precision in the description of experimental approaches. This has far-reaching consequences, including wasted resources and slowing of progress. Additionally, the large number of laboratories around the world publishing articles on a given topic make it difficult, if not impossible, for individual researchers to read all of the relevant literature. Consequently, centralized databases are needed to facilitate the generation of new hypotheses for testing. One strategy to improve transparency in experimental description, and to allow the development of frameworks for computer-readable knowledge repositories, is the adoption of uniform reporting standards, such as common data elements (data elements used in multiple clinical studies) and minimum information standards. This article describes a minimum information standard for spinal cord injury (SCI) experiments, its major elements, and the approaches used to develop it. Transparent reporting standards for experiments using animal models of human SCI aim to reduce inherent bias and increase experimental value.",
keywords = "axonal injury, axonal regeneration, MIASCI, spinal cord injury",
author = "Vance Lemmon and Ferguson, {Adam R.} and Popovich, {Phillip G.} and Xu, {Xiao Ming} and Snow, {Diane M.} and Michihiro Igarashi and Beattie, {Christine E.} and John Bixby",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/neu.2014.3400",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1354--1361",
journal = "Journal of Neurotrauma",
issn = "0897-7151",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimum information about a spinal cord injury experiment

T2 - A proposed reporting standard for spinal cord injury experiments

AU - Lemmon, Vance

AU - Ferguson, Adam R.

AU - Popovich, Phillip G.

AU - Xu, Xiao Ming

AU - Snow, Diane M.

AU - Igarashi, Michihiro

AU - Beattie, Christine E.

AU - Bixby, John

PY - 2014/8/1

Y1 - 2014/8/1

N2 - The lack of reproducibility in many areas of experimental science has a number of causes, including a lack of transparency and precision in the description of experimental approaches. This has far-reaching consequences, including wasted resources and slowing of progress. Additionally, the large number of laboratories around the world publishing articles on a given topic make it difficult, if not impossible, for individual researchers to read all of the relevant literature. Consequently, centralized databases are needed to facilitate the generation of new hypotheses for testing. One strategy to improve transparency in experimental description, and to allow the development of frameworks for computer-readable knowledge repositories, is the adoption of uniform reporting standards, such as common data elements (data elements used in multiple clinical studies) and minimum information standards. This article describes a minimum information standard for spinal cord injury (SCI) experiments, its major elements, and the approaches used to develop it. Transparent reporting standards for experiments using animal models of human SCI aim to reduce inherent bias and increase experimental value.

AB - The lack of reproducibility in many areas of experimental science has a number of causes, including a lack of transparency and precision in the description of experimental approaches. This has far-reaching consequences, including wasted resources and slowing of progress. Additionally, the large number of laboratories around the world publishing articles on a given topic make it difficult, if not impossible, for individual researchers to read all of the relevant literature. Consequently, centralized databases are needed to facilitate the generation of new hypotheses for testing. One strategy to improve transparency in experimental description, and to allow the development of frameworks for computer-readable knowledge repositories, is the adoption of uniform reporting standards, such as common data elements (data elements used in multiple clinical studies) and minimum information standards. This article describes a minimum information standard for spinal cord injury (SCI) experiments, its major elements, and the approaches used to develop it. Transparent reporting standards for experiments using animal models of human SCI aim to reduce inherent bias and increase experimental value.

KW - axonal injury

KW - axonal regeneration

KW - MIASCI

KW - spinal cord injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905221020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905221020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/neu.2014.3400

DO - 10.1089/neu.2014.3400

M3 - Article

C2 - 24870067

AN - SCOPUS:84905221020

VL - 31

SP - 1354

EP - 1361

JO - Journal of Neurotrauma

JF - Journal of Neurotrauma

SN - 0897-7151

IS - 15

ER -