Methods for assessment of short-term coral reef fish movements within an acoustic array

Nicholas A. Farmer, Jerald S Ault, Steven G. Smith, Erik C. Franklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Arrays of passive receivers are a widely used tool for tracking the movements of acoustically-tagged fish in marine ecosystems; however, the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of coral reef environments pose challenges for the interpretation of tag detection data. To improve this situation for reef fishes, we introduced a novel response variable method that treats signal detections as proportions (i.e., percent transmissions detected or "detection rates") and compared this against prior approaches to examine the influence of array and transmitter performance, signal distance and environmental factors on detection rates. We applied this method to tagged snappers and groupers in the Florida reef ecosystem and controlled range-tests on static targets in Bayboro Harbor, Florida, to provide methodological guidance for the planning and evaluation of passive array studies for coral reef fishes. Results: Logistic regression analysis indicated detection rates were primarily a non-linear function of tag distance from receiver. A 'model-weighted' function was developed to incorporate the non-linear relationship between detection rate and distance to provide robust positioning estimates and allow for easy extension to tags with different ping rates. Conclusions: Optimal acoustic array design requires balancing the interplay between receiver spacing, detection rates, and positioning error. Spacing receivers at twice the distance of the modeled 50% detection rate may be appropriate when quantification of overall space use is a priority, and would provide a minimum of 75% detection rate. However, for research where missing detections within the array is unacceptable or time-at-arrival based fine-scale positioning is needed, tighter receiver spacing may be required to maintain signal detection probability near 100%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7
JournalMovement Ecology
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2 2013

Fingerprint

acoustic array
coral reefs
coral reef
acoustics
fish
positioning
methodology
spacing
spatial distribution
reefs
reef
method
detection
space use
snapper
grouper
rate
marine ecosystem
logistics
regression analysis

Keywords

  • Acoustic array
  • Acoustic telemetry
  • Coral reef
  • Dry Tortugas
  • Fish movements
  • Marine reserves
  • Reef fish

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Methods for assessment of short-term coral reef fish movements within an acoustic array. / Farmer, Nicholas A.; Ault, Jerald S; Smith, Steven G.; Franklin, Erik C.

In: Movement Ecology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 7, 02.09.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farmer, Nicholas A. ; Ault, Jerald S ; Smith, Steven G. ; Franklin, Erik C. / Methods for assessment of short-term coral reef fish movements within an acoustic array. In: Movement Ecology. 2013 ; Vol. 1, No. 1.
@article{ef6621dea453498db0fb0b51a3e89bc6,
title = "Methods for assessment of short-term coral reef fish movements within an acoustic array",
abstract = "Background: Arrays of passive receivers are a widely used tool for tracking the movements of acoustically-tagged fish in marine ecosystems; however, the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of coral reef environments pose challenges for the interpretation of tag detection data. To improve this situation for reef fishes, we introduced a novel response variable method that treats signal detections as proportions (i.e., percent transmissions detected or {"}detection rates{"}) and compared this against prior approaches to examine the influence of array and transmitter performance, signal distance and environmental factors on detection rates. We applied this method to tagged snappers and groupers in the Florida reef ecosystem and controlled range-tests on static targets in Bayboro Harbor, Florida, to provide methodological guidance for the planning and evaluation of passive array studies for coral reef fishes. Results: Logistic regression analysis indicated detection rates were primarily a non-linear function of tag distance from receiver. A 'model-weighted' function was developed to incorporate the non-linear relationship between detection rate and distance to provide robust positioning estimates and allow for easy extension to tags with different ping rates. Conclusions: Optimal acoustic array design requires balancing the interplay between receiver spacing, detection rates, and positioning error. Spacing receivers at twice the distance of the modeled 50{\%} detection rate may be appropriate when quantification of overall space use is a priority, and would provide a minimum of 75{\%} detection rate. However, for research where missing detections within the array is unacceptable or time-at-arrival based fine-scale positioning is needed, tighter receiver spacing may be required to maintain signal detection probability near 100{\%}.",
keywords = "Acoustic array, Acoustic telemetry, Coral reef, Dry Tortugas, Fish movements, Marine reserves, Reef fish",
author = "Farmer, {Nicholas A.} and Ault, {Jerald S} and Smith, {Steven G.} and Franklin, {Erik C.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1186/2051-3933-1-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
journal = "Movement Ecology",
issn = "2051-3933",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods for assessment of short-term coral reef fish movements within an acoustic array

AU - Farmer, Nicholas A.

AU - Ault, Jerald S

AU - Smith, Steven G.

AU - Franklin, Erik C.

PY - 2013/9/2

Y1 - 2013/9/2

N2 - Background: Arrays of passive receivers are a widely used tool for tracking the movements of acoustically-tagged fish in marine ecosystems; however, the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of coral reef environments pose challenges for the interpretation of tag detection data. To improve this situation for reef fishes, we introduced a novel response variable method that treats signal detections as proportions (i.e., percent transmissions detected or "detection rates") and compared this against prior approaches to examine the influence of array and transmitter performance, signal distance and environmental factors on detection rates. We applied this method to tagged snappers and groupers in the Florida reef ecosystem and controlled range-tests on static targets in Bayboro Harbor, Florida, to provide methodological guidance for the planning and evaluation of passive array studies for coral reef fishes. Results: Logistic regression analysis indicated detection rates were primarily a non-linear function of tag distance from receiver. A 'model-weighted' function was developed to incorporate the non-linear relationship between detection rate and distance to provide robust positioning estimates and allow for easy extension to tags with different ping rates. Conclusions: Optimal acoustic array design requires balancing the interplay between receiver spacing, detection rates, and positioning error. Spacing receivers at twice the distance of the modeled 50% detection rate may be appropriate when quantification of overall space use is a priority, and would provide a minimum of 75% detection rate. However, for research where missing detections within the array is unacceptable or time-at-arrival based fine-scale positioning is needed, tighter receiver spacing may be required to maintain signal detection probability near 100%.

AB - Background: Arrays of passive receivers are a widely used tool for tracking the movements of acoustically-tagged fish in marine ecosystems; however, the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of coral reef environments pose challenges for the interpretation of tag detection data. To improve this situation for reef fishes, we introduced a novel response variable method that treats signal detections as proportions (i.e., percent transmissions detected or "detection rates") and compared this against prior approaches to examine the influence of array and transmitter performance, signal distance and environmental factors on detection rates. We applied this method to tagged snappers and groupers in the Florida reef ecosystem and controlled range-tests on static targets in Bayboro Harbor, Florida, to provide methodological guidance for the planning and evaluation of passive array studies for coral reef fishes. Results: Logistic regression analysis indicated detection rates were primarily a non-linear function of tag distance from receiver. A 'model-weighted' function was developed to incorporate the non-linear relationship between detection rate and distance to provide robust positioning estimates and allow for easy extension to tags with different ping rates. Conclusions: Optimal acoustic array design requires balancing the interplay between receiver spacing, detection rates, and positioning error. Spacing receivers at twice the distance of the modeled 50% detection rate may be appropriate when quantification of overall space use is a priority, and would provide a minimum of 75% detection rate. However, for research where missing detections within the array is unacceptable or time-at-arrival based fine-scale positioning is needed, tighter receiver spacing may be required to maintain signal detection probability near 100%.

KW - Acoustic array

KW - Acoustic telemetry

KW - Coral reef

KW - Dry Tortugas

KW - Fish movements

KW - Marine reserves

KW - Reef fish

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988943773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988943773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/2051-3933-1-7

DO - 10.1186/2051-3933-1-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988943773

VL - 1

JO - Movement Ecology

JF - Movement Ecology

SN - 2051-3933

IS - 1

M1 - 7

ER -