Metals content of recycled construction and demolition wood before and after implementation of best management practices

Nicole M. Robey, Helena M Solo-Gabriele, Athena S. Jones, Juniper Marini, Timothy G. Townsend

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A limitation to recycling wood from construction and demolition (C&D) waste is contamination of metals from the inadvertent inclusion of preservative treated wood, in particular wood treated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA) and newer copper-based formulations. To minimize contamination many regions have developed best management practices (BMPs) for separating treated from untreated wood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fraction of preservative treated wood in recycled C&D wood after the implementation of BMPs, using Florida as a case study. Methods involved collecting recycled C&D wood samples from throughout the state, measuring metals concentrations (As, Cu, and Cr) in the samples to compute the fraction of recycled wood treated with waterborne wood preservatives, and comparing measurements with those taken prior to the formalization of BMPs. Metals concentrations were measured using two methods, one based on traditional laboratory digestion methods and another using a more rapid hand-held X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) device in the field. The proportion of waterborne preservative-treated wood in recycled wood products has reduced significantly in the intervening 20 years (from 6% to 2.9%), and the fraction of CCA-treated wood has been reduced even further, to 1.4%. The remaining fraction of waterborne preservative-treated wood is comprised of new formulations of copper-based preservatives. This suggests that restrictions from the wood preservation industry and best management practices implemented at recycling facilities have been effective in reducing heavy metal contamination from pressure treated lumber in recycled wood products. Best management practices and changes to the preservative wood industry have resulted in a reduction in arsenic-treated wood within recycled C&D wood by a factor of 4.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1198-1205
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume242
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Demolition
Practice Guidelines
Wood
Metals
Copper
Wood products
Contamination
Recycling
Wood preservation
Industry
Lumber
Arsenic
Heavy Metals

Keywords

  • C&D wood recycling
  • Chromated copper arsenate
  • Treated wood
  • Wood preservatives

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Metals content of recycled construction and demolition wood before and after implementation of best management practices. / Robey, Nicole M.; Solo-Gabriele, Helena M; Jones, Athena S.; Marini, Juniper; Townsend, Timothy G.

In: Environmental Pollution, Vol. 242, 01.11.2018, p. 1198-1205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Robey, Nicole M. ; Solo-Gabriele, Helena M ; Jones, Athena S. ; Marini, Juniper ; Townsend, Timothy G. / Metals content of recycled construction and demolition wood before and after implementation of best management practices. In: Environmental Pollution. 2018 ; Vol. 242. pp. 1198-1205.
@article{001c530116db4c3e8cc8215ae8c72025,
title = "Metals content of recycled construction and demolition wood before and after implementation of best management practices",
abstract = "A limitation to recycling wood from construction and demolition (C&D) waste is contamination of metals from the inadvertent inclusion of preservative treated wood, in particular wood treated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA) and newer copper-based formulations. To minimize contamination many regions have developed best management practices (BMPs) for separating treated from untreated wood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fraction of preservative treated wood in recycled C&D wood after the implementation of BMPs, using Florida as a case study. Methods involved collecting recycled C&D wood samples from throughout the state, measuring metals concentrations (As, Cu, and Cr) in the samples to compute the fraction of recycled wood treated with waterborne wood preservatives, and comparing measurements with those taken prior to the formalization of BMPs. Metals concentrations were measured using two methods, one based on traditional laboratory digestion methods and another using a more rapid hand-held X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) device in the field. The proportion of waterborne preservative-treated wood in recycled wood products has reduced significantly in the intervening 20 years (from 6{\%} to 2.9{\%}), and the fraction of CCA-treated wood has been reduced even further, to 1.4{\%}. The remaining fraction of waterborne preservative-treated wood is comprised of new formulations of copper-based preservatives. This suggests that restrictions from the wood preservation industry and best management practices implemented at recycling facilities have been effective in reducing heavy metal contamination from pressure treated lumber in recycled wood products. Best management practices and changes to the preservative wood industry have resulted in a reduction in arsenic-treated wood within recycled C&D wood by a factor of 4.",
keywords = "C&D wood recycling, Chromated copper arsenate, Treated wood, Wood preservatives",
author = "Robey, {Nicole M.} and Solo-Gabriele, {Helena M} and Jones, {Athena S.} and Juniper Marini and Townsend, {Timothy G.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "242",
pages = "1198--1205",
journal = "Environmental Pollution",
issn = "0269-7491",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metals content of recycled construction and demolition wood before and after implementation of best management practices

AU - Robey, Nicole M.

AU - Solo-Gabriele, Helena M

AU - Jones, Athena S.

AU - Marini, Juniper

AU - Townsend, Timothy G.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - A limitation to recycling wood from construction and demolition (C&D) waste is contamination of metals from the inadvertent inclusion of preservative treated wood, in particular wood treated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA) and newer copper-based formulations. To minimize contamination many regions have developed best management practices (BMPs) for separating treated from untreated wood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fraction of preservative treated wood in recycled C&D wood after the implementation of BMPs, using Florida as a case study. Methods involved collecting recycled C&D wood samples from throughout the state, measuring metals concentrations (As, Cu, and Cr) in the samples to compute the fraction of recycled wood treated with waterborne wood preservatives, and comparing measurements with those taken prior to the formalization of BMPs. Metals concentrations were measured using two methods, one based on traditional laboratory digestion methods and another using a more rapid hand-held X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) device in the field. The proportion of waterborne preservative-treated wood in recycled wood products has reduced significantly in the intervening 20 years (from 6% to 2.9%), and the fraction of CCA-treated wood has been reduced even further, to 1.4%. The remaining fraction of waterborne preservative-treated wood is comprised of new formulations of copper-based preservatives. This suggests that restrictions from the wood preservation industry and best management practices implemented at recycling facilities have been effective in reducing heavy metal contamination from pressure treated lumber in recycled wood products. Best management practices and changes to the preservative wood industry have resulted in a reduction in arsenic-treated wood within recycled C&D wood by a factor of 4.

AB - A limitation to recycling wood from construction and demolition (C&D) waste is contamination of metals from the inadvertent inclusion of preservative treated wood, in particular wood treated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA) and newer copper-based formulations. To minimize contamination many regions have developed best management practices (BMPs) for separating treated from untreated wood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fraction of preservative treated wood in recycled C&D wood after the implementation of BMPs, using Florida as a case study. Methods involved collecting recycled C&D wood samples from throughout the state, measuring metals concentrations (As, Cu, and Cr) in the samples to compute the fraction of recycled wood treated with waterborne wood preservatives, and comparing measurements with those taken prior to the formalization of BMPs. Metals concentrations were measured using two methods, one based on traditional laboratory digestion methods and another using a more rapid hand-held X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) device in the field. The proportion of waterborne preservative-treated wood in recycled wood products has reduced significantly in the intervening 20 years (from 6% to 2.9%), and the fraction of CCA-treated wood has been reduced even further, to 1.4%. The remaining fraction of waterborne preservative-treated wood is comprised of new formulations of copper-based preservatives. This suggests that restrictions from the wood preservation industry and best management practices implemented at recycling facilities have been effective in reducing heavy metal contamination from pressure treated lumber in recycled wood products. Best management practices and changes to the preservative wood industry have resulted in a reduction in arsenic-treated wood within recycled C&D wood by a factor of 4.

KW - C&D wood recycling

KW - Chromated copper arsenate

KW - Treated wood

KW - Wood preservatives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051411617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051411617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.134

DO - 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.134

M3 - Article

C2 - 30118908

AN - SCOPUS:85051411617

VL - 242

SP - 1198

EP - 1205

JO - Environmental Pollution

JF - Environmental Pollution

SN - 0269-7491

ER -