Metadata quality for federated collections

Besiki Stvilia, Les Gasser, Michael B. Twidale, Timothy W. Cole, Sarah L. Shreeves

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

This paper presents early results from our empirical studies of metadata quality
in large corpuses of metadata harvested under Open Archives Initiative (OAI) protocols. Along with some discussion of why and how metadata quality is important, an approach to conceptualizing, measuring, and assessing metadata quality is presented. The approach given in this paper is based on a more general model of information quality (IQ) for many kinds of information beyond just metadata. A key feature of the general model is its ability to condition quality assessments by context of information use, such as the types of activities that use the information, and the typified norms and values of relevant information-using communities. The paper presents a number of statistical characterizations of analyzed samples of metadata from a large corpus built as part of the Institute of Museum and Library Services Digital Collections and Contents (IMLS DCC)2 project containing OAI-harvested metadata and links these statistical assessments to the quality measures, and interprets them. Finally the paper discusses several approaches to quality improvement for metadata based on the study findings.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages111-125
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes
EventNinth International Conference on Information Quality - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
Duration: Nov 5 2004Nov 7 2004

Conference

ConferenceNinth International Conference on Information Quality
CountryUnited States
CityCambridge
Period11/5/0411/7/04

Fingerprint

museum
ability
community

Keywords

  • Information quality
  • Metadata aggregation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M. B., Cole, T. W., & Shreeves, S. L. (2004). Metadata quality for federated collections. 111-125. Paper presented at Ninth International Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, United States.

Metadata quality for federated collections. / Stvilia, Besiki; Gasser, Les; Twidale, Michael B.; Cole, Timothy W.; Shreeves, Sarah L.

2004. 111-125 Paper presented at Ninth International Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Stvilia, B, Gasser, L, Twidale, MB, Cole, TW & Shreeves, SL 2004, 'Metadata quality for federated collections' Paper presented at Ninth International Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, United States, 11/5/04 - 11/7/04, pp. 111-125.
Stvilia B, Gasser L, Twidale MB, Cole TW, Shreeves SL. Metadata quality for federated collections. 2004. Paper presented at Ninth International Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, United States.
Stvilia, Besiki ; Gasser, Les ; Twidale, Michael B. ; Cole, Timothy W. ; Shreeves, Sarah L. / Metadata quality for federated collections. Paper presented at Ninth International Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, United States.
@conference{8efcf058f6234178b254e603e009770b,
title = "Metadata quality for federated collections",
abstract = "This paper presents early results from our empirical studies of metadata qualityin large corpuses of metadata harvested under Open Archives Initiative (OAI) protocols. Along with some discussion of why and how metadata quality is important, an approach to conceptualizing, measuring, and assessing metadata quality is presented. The approach given in this paper is based on a more general model of information quality (IQ) for many kinds of information beyond just metadata. A key feature of the general model is its ability to condition quality assessments by context of information use, such as the types of activities that use the information, and the typified norms and values of relevant information-using communities. The paper presents a number of statistical characterizations of analyzed samples of metadata from a large corpus built as part of the Institute of Museum and Library Services Digital Collections and Contents (IMLS DCC)2 project containing OAI-harvested metadata and links these statistical assessments to the quality measures, and interprets them. Finally the paper discusses several approaches to quality improvement for metadata based on the study findings.",
keywords = "Information quality, Metadata aggregation",
author = "Besiki Stvilia and Les Gasser and Twidale, {Michael B.} and Cole, {Timothy W.} and Shreeves, {Sarah L.}",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "111--125",
note = "Ninth International Conference on Information Quality ; Conference date: 05-11-2004 Through 07-11-2004",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Metadata quality for federated collections

AU - Stvilia, Besiki

AU - Gasser, Les

AU - Twidale, Michael B.

AU - Cole, Timothy W.

AU - Shreeves, Sarah L.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This paper presents early results from our empirical studies of metadata qualityin large corpuses of metadata harvested under Open Archives Initiative (OAI) protocols. Along with some discussion of why and how metadata quality is important, an approach to conceptualizing, measuring, and assessing metadata quality is presented. The approach given in this paper is based on a more general model of information quality (IQ) for many kinds of information beyond just metadata. A key feature of the general model is its ability to condition quality assessments by context of information use, such as the types of activities that use the information, and the typified norms and values of relevant information-using communities. The paper presents a number of statistical characterizations of analyzed samples of metadata from a large corpus built as part of the Institute of Museum and Library Services Digital Collections and Contents (IMLS DCC)2 project containing OAI-harvested metadata and links these statistical assessments to the quality measures, and interprets them. Finally the paper discusses several approaches to quality improvement for metadata based on the study findings.

AB - This paper presents early results from our empirical studies of metadata qualityin large corpuses of metadata harvested under Open Archives Initiative (OAI) protocols. Along with some discussion of why and how metadata quality is important, an approach to conceptualizing, measuring, and assessing metadata quality is presented. The approach given in this paper is based on a more general model of information quality (IQ) for many kinds of information beyond just metadata. A key feature of the general model is its ability to condition quality assessments by context of information use, such as the types of activities that use the information, and the typified norms and values of relevant information-using communities. The paper presents a number of statistical characterizations of analyzed samples of metadata from a large corpus built as part of the Institute of Museum and Library Services Digital Collections and Contents (IMLS DCC)2 project containing OAI-harvested metadata and links these statistical assessments to the quality measures, and interprets them. Finally the paper discusses several approaches to quality improvement for metadata based on the study findings.

KW - Information quality

KW - Metadata aggregation

M3 - Paper

SP - 111

EP - 125

ER -