Meta-analysis of the association between cognitive abilities and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder

Colin A. Depp, Brent T. Mausbach, Alexandrea L. Harmell, Gauri N. Savla, Christopher R. Bowie, Philip D Harvey, Thomas L. Patterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

134 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Neurocognitive deficits are common in bipolar disorder and contribute to functional disability. However, the degree to which general and specific cognitive deficits affect everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is unknown. The goal of this meta-analysis was to examine the magnitude of the effect of specific neurocognitive abilities on everyday functioning in bipolar disorder. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies that reported associations between performance on objective neuropsychological tasks and everyday functioning among individuals with bipolar disorder. From an initial pool of 486 papers, 22 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 1344 participants. Correlation coefficients were calculated for 11 cognitive domains and four measurement modalities for functioning. We also examined effect moderators, such as sample age, clinical state, and study design. Results: The mean Pearson correlation between neurocognitive ability and functioning was 0.27, and was significant for all cognitive domains and varied little by cognitive domain. Correlations varied by methods of everyday functioning assessment, being lower for clinician and self-report than performance-based tasks and real-world milestones such as employment. None of the moderator analyses were significant. Conclusions: Overall, the strength of association between cognitive ability and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is strikingly similar to that seen in schizophrenia, with little evidence for differences across cognitive domains. The strength of association differed to a greater extent according to functional measurement approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-226
Number of pages10
JournalBipolar Disorders
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Bipolar Disorder
Meta-Analysis
Task Performance and Analysis
Self Report
Schizophrenia

Keywords

  • Bipolar disorder
  • Cognition
  • Disability
  • Functioning
  • Neuropsychology
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Meta-analysis of the association between cognitive abilities and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder. / Depp, Colin A.; Mausbach, Brent T.; Harmell, Alexandrea L.; Savla, Gauri N.; Bowie, Christopher R.; Harvey, Philip D; Patterson, Thomas L.

In: Bipolar Disorders, Vol. 14, No. 3, 01.05.2012, p. 217-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Depp, Colin A. ; Mausbach, Brent T. ; Harmell, Alexandrea L. ; Savla, Gauri N. ; Bowie, Christopher R. ; Harvey, Philip D ; Patterson, Thomas L. / Meta-analysis of the association between cognitive abilities and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder. In: Bipolar Disorders. 2012 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 217-226.
@article{4d02f4ed4b2a463d81670920e38c0174,
title = "Meta-analysis of the association between cognitive abilities and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder",
abstract = "Objectives: Neurocognitive deficits are common in bipolar disorder and contribute to functional disability. However, the degree to which general and specific cognitive deficits affect everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is unknown. The goal of this meta-analysis was to examine the magnitude of the effect of specific neurocognitive abilities on everyday functioning in bipolar disorder. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies that reported associations between performance on objective neuropsychological tasks and everyday functioning among individuals with bipolar disorder. From an initial pool of 486 papers, 22 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 1344 participants. Correlation coefficients were calculated for 11 cognitive domains and four measurement modalities for functioning. We also examined effect moderators, such as sample age, clinical state, and study design. Results: The mean Pearson correlation between neurocognitive ability and functioning was 0.27, and was significant for all cognitive domains and varied little by cognitive domain. Correlations varied by methods of everyday functioning assessment, being lower for clinician and self-report than performance-based tasks and real-world milestones such as employment. None of the moderator analyses were significant. Conclusions: Overall, the strength of association between cognitive ability and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is strikingly similar to that seen in schizophrenia, with little evidence for differences across cognitive domains. The strength of association differed to a greater extent according to functional measurement approach.",
keywords = "Bipolar disorder, Cognition, Disability, Functioning, Neuropsychology, Quality of life",
author = "Depp, {Colin A.} and Mausbach, {Brent T.} and Harmell, {Alexandrea L.} and Savla, {Gauri N.} and Bowie, {Christopher R.} and Harvey, {Philip D} and Patterson, {Thomas L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01011.x",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "217--226",
journal = "Bipolar Disorders",
issn = "1398-5647",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-analysis of the association between cognitive abilities and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder

AU - Depp, Colin A.

AU - Mausbach, Brent T.

AU - Harmell, Alexandrea L.

AU - Savla, Gauri N.

AU - Bowie, Christopher R.

AU - Harvey, Philip D

AU - Patterson, Thomas L.

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Objectives: Neurocognitive deficits are common in bipolar disorder and contribute to functional disability. However, the degree to which general and specific cognitive deficits affect everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is unknown. The goal of this meta-analysis was to examine the magnitude of the effect of specific neurocognitive abilities on everyday functioning in bipolar disorder. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies that reported associations between performance on objective neuropsychological tasks and everyday functioning among individuals with bipolar disorder. From an initial pool of 486 papers, 22 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 1344 participants. Correlation coefficients were calculated for 11 cognitive domains and four measurement modalities for functioning. We also examined effect moderators, such as sample age, clinical state, and study design. Results: The mean Pearson correlation between neurocognitive ability and functioning was 0.27, and was significant for all cognitive domains and varied little by cognitive domain. Correlations varied by methods of everyday functioning assessment, being lower for clinician and self-report than performance-based tasks and real-world milestones such as employment. None of the moderator analyses were significant. Conclusions: Overall, the strength of association between cognitive ability and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is strikingly similar to that seen in schizophrenia, with little evidence for differences across cognitive domains. The strength of association differed to a greater extent according to functional measurement approach.

AB - Objectives: Neurocognitive deficits are common in bipolar disorder and contribute to functional disability. However, the degree to which general and specific cognitive deficits affect everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is unknown. The goal of this meta-analysis was to examine the magnitude of the effect of specific neurocognitive abilities on everyday functioning in bipolar disorder. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies that reported associations between performance on objective neuropsychological tasks and everyday functioning among individuals with bipolar disorder. From an initial pool of 486 papers, 22 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 1344 participants. Correlation coefficients were calculated for 11 cognitive domains and four measurement modalities for functioning. We also examined effect moderators, such as sample age, clinical state, and study design. Results: The mean Pearson correlation between neurocognitive ability and functioning was 0.27, and was significant for all cognitive domains and varied little by cognitive domain. Correlations varied by methods of everyday functioning assessment, being lower for clinician and self-report than performance-based tasks and real-world milestones such as employment. None of the moderator analyses were significant. Conclusions: Overall, the strength of association between cognitive ability and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is strikingly similar to that seen in schizophrenia, with little evidence for differences across cognitive domains. The strength of association differed to a greater extent according to functional measurement approach.

KW - Bipolar disorder

KW - Cognition

KW - Disability

KW - Functioning

KW - Neuropsychology

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860385632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860385632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01011.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01011.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22548895

AN - SCOPUS:84860385632

VL - 14

SP - 217

EP - 226

JO - Bipolar Disorders

JF - Bipolar Disorders

SN - 1398-5647

IS - 3

ER -