Mental Health in Internationally Adopted Adolescents

A Meta-Analysis

Kristin Gärtner Askeland, Mari Hysing, Annette M La Greca, Leif Edvard Aarø, Grethe S. Tell, Børge Sivertsen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether mental health problems differ between internationally adopted adolescents and their non-adopted peers and examine design and sample characteristics that might underlie differences among studies. Method Studies published through August 2015 were collected through Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science, ERIC, and Svemed+. Combined effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results Eleven studies investigating 17,919 adoptees and 1,090,289 non-adopted peers were included in the meta-analysis. Internationally adopted adolescents reported more mental health problems across domains than their peers, with effect estimates (standardized mean differences [SMDs]) of 0.16 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.28) for questionnaire-based studies and 0.70 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.90) for register-based studies. They also reported significantly more externalizing difficulties (SMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.38), although the effect estimate for internalizing difficulties was not statistically significant (SMD 0.10, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.24). Studies using categorical measurements of mental health problems, indicating more serious problems, yielded larger effect estimates than continuous measurements (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.41; SMD 0.13, 95% CI −0.01 to 0.26, respectively). The difference in mental health problems between international adoptees and their peers was somewhat larger when using parent report compared with self-report. More recent studies (conducted in 1995 and later) yielded larger estimates than older studies, although no significant difference was found for this analysis or subgroup analyses investigating sex and age at adoption. Conclusion Although most internationally adopted adolescents are well adjusted, adoptees as a group report higher levels of mental health problems compared with non-adopted peers. This difference should be acknowledged and adequate support services should be made available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-213.e1
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Mental Health
Self Report
Health Status

Keywords

  • adolescence
  • adoption
  • mental health
  • meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Mental Health in Internationally Adopted Adolescents : A Meta-Analysis. / Askeland, Kristin Gärtner; Hysing, Mari; La Greca, Annette M; Aarø, Leif Edvard; Tell, Grethe S.; Sivertsen, Børge.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 56, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 203-213.e1.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Askeland, Kristin Gärtner ; Hysing, Mari ; La Greca, Annette M ; Aarø, Leif Edvard ; Tell, Grethe S. ; Sivertsen, Børge. / Mental Health in Internationally Adopted Adolescents : A Meta-Analysis. In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2017 ; Vol. 56, No. 3. pp. 203-213.e1.
@article{d7cd9457b23c45bb80683a0fed42b419,
title = "Mental Health in Internationally Adopted Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis",
abstract = "Objective To investigate whether mental health problems differ between internationally adopted adolescents and their non-adopted peers and examine design and sample characteristics that might underlie differences among studies. Method Studies published through August 2015 were collected through Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science, ERIC, and Svemed+. Combined effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results Eleven studies investigating 17,919 adoptees and 1,090,289 non-adopted peers were included in the meta-analysis. Internationally adopted adolescents reported more mental health problems across domains than their peers, with effect estimates (standardized mean differences [SMDs]) of 0.16 (95{\%} CI 0.03 to 0.28) for questionnaire-based studies and 0.70 (95{\%} CI 0.50 to 0.90) for register-based studies. They also reported significantly more externalizing difficulties (SMD 0.20, 95{\%} CI 0.03 to 0.38), although the effect estimate for internalizing difficulties was not statistically significant (SMD 0.10, 95{\%} CI −0.03 to 0.24). Studies using categorical measurements of mental health problems, indicating more serious problems, yielded larger effect estimates than continuous measurements (SMD 0.31, 95{\%} CI 0.21 to 0.41; SMD 0.13, 95{\%} CI −0.01 to 0.26, respectively). The difference in mental health problems between international adoptees and their peers was somewhat larger when using parent report compared with self-report. More recent studies (conducted in 1995 and later) yielded larger estimates than older studies, although no significant difference was found for this analysis or subgroup analyses investigating sex and age at adoption. Conclusion Although most internationally adopted adolescents are well adjusted, adoptees as a group report higher levels of mental health problems compared with non-adopted peers. This difference should be acknowledged and adequate support services should be made available.",
keywords = "adolescence, adoption, mental health, meta-analysis",
author = "Askeland, {Kristin G{\"a}rtner} and Mari Hysing and {La Greca}, {Annette M} and Aar{\o}, {Leif Edvard} and Tell, {Grethe S.} and B{\o}rge Sivertsen",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaac.2016.12.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "203--213.e1",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
issn = "0890-8567",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental Health in Internationally Adopted Adolescents

T2 - A Meta-Analysis

AU - Askeland, Kristin Gärtner

AU - Hysing, Mari

AU - La Greca, Annette M

AU - Aarø, Leif Edvard

AU - Tell, Grethe S.

AU - Sivertsen, Børge

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objective To investigate whether mental health problems differ between internationally adopted adolescents and their non-adopted peers and examine design and sample characteristics that might underlie differences among studies. Method Studies published through August 2015 were collected through Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science, ERIC, and Svemed+. Combined effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results Eleven studies investigating 17,919 adoptees and 1,090,289 non-adopted peers were included in the meta-analysis. Internationally adopted adolescents reported more mental health problems across domains than their peers, with effect estimates (standardized mean differences [SMDs]) of 0.16 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.28) for questionnaire-based studies and 0.70 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.90) for register-based studies. They also reported significantly more externalizing difficulties (SMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.38), although the effect estimate for internalizing difficulties was not statistically significant (SMD 0.10, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.24). Studies using categorical measurements of mental health problems, indicating more serious problems, yielded larger effect estimates than continuous measurements (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.41; SMD 0.13, 95% CI −0.01 to 0.26, respectively). The difference in mental health problems between international adoptees and their peers was somewhat larger when using parent report compared with self-report. More recent studies (conducted in 1995 and later) yielded larger estimates than older studies, although no significant difference was found for this analysis or subgroup analyses investigating sex and age at adoption. Conclusion Although most internationally adopted adolescents are well adjusted, adoptees as a group report higher levels of mental health problems compared with non-adopted peers. This difference should be acknowledged and adequate support services should be made available.

AB - Objective To investigate whether mental health problems differ between internationally adopted adolescents and their non-adopted peers and examine design and sample characteristics that might underlie differences among studies. Method Studies published through August 2015 were collected through Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science, ERIC, and Svemed+. Combined effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results Eleven studies investigating 17,919 adoptees and 1,090,289 non-adopted peers were included in the meta-analysis. Internationally adopted adolescents reported more mental health problems across domains than their peers, with effect estimates (standardized mean differences [SMDs]) of 0.16 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.28) for questionnaire-based studies and 0.70 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.90) for register-based studies. They also reported significantly more externalizing difficulties (SMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.38), although the effect estimate for internalizing difficulties was not statistically significant (SMD 0.10, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.24). Studies using categorical measurements of mental health problems, indicating more serious problems, yielded larger effect estimates than continuous measurements (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.41; SMD 0.13, 95% CI −0.01 to 0.26, respectively). The difference in mental health problems between international adoptees and their peers was somewhat larger when using parent report compared with self-report. More recent studies (conducted in 1995 and later) yielded larger estimates than older studies, although no significant difference was found for this analysis or subgroup analyses investigating sex and age at adoption. Conclusion Although most internationally adopted adolescents are well adjusted, adoptees as a group report higher levels of mental health problems compared with non-adopted peers. This difference should be acknowledged and adequate support services should be made available.

KW - adolescence

KW - adoption

KW - mental health

KW - meta-analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009507990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009507990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.12.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.12.009

M3 - Review article

VL - 56

SP - 203-213.e1

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

SN - 0890-8567

IS - 3

ER -