Memory binding test distinguishes amnestic mild cognitive impairment and dementia from cognitively normal elderly

Herman Buschke, Wenzhu B. Mowrey, Wendy S. Ramratan, Molly E. Zimmerman, David Loewenstein, Mindy J. Katz, Richard B. Lipton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to assess reliability and cross-sectional discriminative validity of the Memory Binding Test (MBT) to distinguish persons with amnestic cognitive impairment (aMCI) and dementia from cognitively normal elderly controls. Method: The MBT was administered to 20 participants with dementia, 31 with aMCI and 246 controls, who received the first administration of the MBT from May 2003 to December 2007, as a substudy of the community-based Einstein Aging Study (age range: 70+). The optimal index resulted from comparing the partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC AUC) of four major MBT indices for specificities ≥0.70. Optimal cut-score of the optimal index was selected by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity. Age and education effects were assessed using stratified cut-scores and adjusted logistic regression. Reliability was computed as intraclass correlation between scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up for participants who remained cognitively normal. Results: Total number of Items recalled in the Paired condition (TIP) was elected the optimal index. TIP cut-score was ≤22 for differentiating aMCI alone (sensitivity = 0.74, specificity = 0.73) and aMCI and dementia combined (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.73) from controls. It was ≤17 for differentiating dementia from aMCI and controls (sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 0.87). Age and education adjustments did not materially improve discriminative validity. The reliability of TIP was 0.77. Conclusions: MBT achieved moderate to good reliability. TIP had superior cross-sectional discriminative validity than the other MBT indices. We recommend using the empirical cut-score of TIP ≤22 for discriminating aMCI and dementia and ≤17 for discriminating dementia alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-39
Number of pages11
JournalArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Dementia
Sensitivity and Specificity
ROC Curve
Education
Social Adjustment
Area Under Curve
Cognitive Dysfunction
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Dementia
  • Elderly/geriatrics/aging
  • Learning and memory
  • Mild cognitive impairment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Memory binding test distinguishes amnestic mild cognitive impairment and dementia from cognitively normal elderly. / Buschke, Herman; Mowrey, Wenzhu B.; Ramratan, Wendy S.; Zimmerman, Molly E.; Loewenstein, David; Katz, Mindy J.; Lipton, Richard B.

In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. 29-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buschke, Herman ; Mowrey, Wenzhu B. ; Ramratan, Wendy S. ; Zimmerman, Molly E. ; Loewenstein, David ; Katz, Mindy J. ; Lipton, Richard B. / Memory binding test distinguishes amnestic mild cognitive impairment and dementia from cognitively normal elderly. In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 29-39.
@article{3f47d45ba6174c108a067000ce2bbe54,
title = "Memory binding test distinguishes amnestic mild cognitive impairment and dementia from cognitively normal elderly",
abstract = "Objective: We aimed to assess reliability and cross-sectional discriminative validity of the Memory Binding Test (MBT) to distinguish persons with amnestic cognitive impairment (aMCI) and dementia from cognitively normal elderly controls. Method: The MBT was administered to 20 participants with dementia, 31 with aMCI and 246 controls, who received the first administration of the MBT from May 2003 to December 2007, as a substudy of the community-based Einstein Aging Study (age range: 70+). The optimal index resulted from comparing the partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC AUC) of four major MBT indices for specificities ≥0.70. Optimal cut-score of the optimal index was selected by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity. Age and education effects were assessed using stratified cut-scores and adjusted logistic regression. Reliability was computed as intraclass correlation between scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up for participants who remained cognitively normal. Results: Total number of Items recalled in the Paired condition (TIP) was elected the optimal index. TIP cut-score was ≤22 for differentiating aMCI alone (sensitivity = 0.74, specificity = 0.73) and aMCI and dementia combined (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.73) from controls. It was ≤17 for differentiating dementia from aMCI and controls (sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 0.87). Age and education adjustments did not materially improve discriminative validity. The reliability of TIP was 0.77. Conclusions: MBT achieved moderate to good reliability. TIP had superior cross-sectional discriminative validity than the other MBT indices. We recommend using the empirical cut-score of TIP ≤22 for discriminating aMCI and dementia and ≤17 for discriminating dementia alone.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, Dementia, Elderly/geriatrics/aging, Learning and memory, Mild cognitive impairment",
author = "Herman Buschke and Mowrey, {Wenzhu B.} and Ramratan, {Wendy S.} and Zimmerman, {Molly E.} and David Loewenstein and Katz, {Mindy J.} and Lipton, {Richard B.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/arclin/acw083",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "29--39",
journal = "Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology",
issn = "0887-6177",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory binding test distinguishes amnestic mild cognitive impairment and dementia from cognitively normal elderly

AU - Buschke, Herman

AU - Mowrey, Wenzhu B.

AU - Ramratan, Wendy S.

AU - Zimmerman, Molly E.

AU - Loewenstein, David

AU - Katz, Mindy J.

AU - Lipton, Richard B.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Objective: We aimed to assess reliability and cross-sectional discriminative validity of the Memory Binding Test (MBT) to distinguish persons with amnestic cognitive impairment (aMCI) and dementia from cognitively normal elderly controls. Method: The MBT was administered to 20 participants with dementia, 31 with aMCI and 246 controls, who received the first administration of the MBT from May 2003 to December 2007, as a substudy of the community-based Einstein Aging Study (age range: 70+). The optimal index resulted from comparing the partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC AUC) of four major MBT indices for specificities ≥0.70. Optimal cut-score of the optimal index was selected by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity. Age and education effects were assessed using stratified cut-scores and adjusted logistic regression. Reliability was computed as intraclass correlation between scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up for participants who remained cognitively normal. Results: Total number of Items recalled in the Paired condition (TIP) was elected the optimal index. TIP cut-score was ≤22 for differentiating aMCI alone (sensitivity = 0.74, specificity = 0.73) and aMCI and dementia combined (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.73) from controls. It was ≤17 for differentiating dementia from aMCI and controls (sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 0.87). Age and education adjustments did not materially improve discriminative validity. The reliability of TIP was 0.77. Conclusions: MBT achieved moderate to good reliability. TIP had superior cross-sectional discriminative validity than the other MBT indices. We recommend using the empirical cut-score of TIP ≤22 for discriminating aMCI and dementia and ≤17 for discriminating dementia alone.

AB - Objective: We aimed to assess reliability and cross-sectional discriminative validity of the Memory Binding Test (MBT) to distinguish persons with amnestic cognitive impairment (aMCI) and dementia from cognitively normal elderly controls. Method: The MBT was administered to 20 participants with dementia, 31 with aMCI and 246 controls, who received the first administration of the MBT from May 2003 to December 2007, as a substudy of the community-based Einstein Aging Study (age range: 70+). The optimal index resulted from comparing the partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC AUC) of four major MBT indices for specificities ≥0.70. Optimal cut-score of the optimal index was selected by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity. Age and education effects were assessed using stratified cut-scores and adjusted logistic regression. Reliability was computed as intraclass correlation between scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up for participants who remained cognitively normal. Results: Total number of Items recalled in the Paired condition (TIP) was elected the optimal index. TIP cut-score was ≤22 for differentiating aMCI alone (sensitivity = 0.74, specificity = 0.73) and aMCI and dementia combined (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.73) from controls. It was ≤17 for differentiating dementia from aMCI and controls (sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 0.87). Age and education adjustments did not materially improve discriminative validity. The reliability of TIP was 0.77. Conclusions: MBT achieved moderate to good reliability. TIP had superior cross-sectional discriminative validity than the other MBT indices. We recommend using the empirical cut-score of TIP ≤22 for discriminating aMCI and dementia and ≤17 for discriminating dementia alone.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - Dementia

KW - Elderly/geriatrics/aging

KW - Learning and memory

KW - Mild cognitive impairment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012850937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012850937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/arclin/acw083

DO - 10.1093/arclin/acw083

M3 - Article

C2 - 27680087

AN - SCOPUS:85012850937

VL - 32

SP - 29

EP - 39

JO - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

JF - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

SN - 0887-6177

IS - 1

ER -