Measuring the involvement of people with HIV in treatment decision making using the control preferences scale

Heidemarie Kremer, Gail Ironson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. Since 1983, HIV patients have been advocating for participatory decision making. This study measures the involvement that HIV-positive people perceive in treatment decision making. A secondary objective is to assess the validity of the instrument used to examine decisional roles, the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). Method. The authors interviewed 79 HIV-positive people, a sub-sample of a study on long survival with HIV, diverse with respect to ethnicity, age, gender, and sexual orientation. They compared the self- and researcher-rated decisional roles of participants on the CPS. They also assessed how well the CPS corresponds with Charles's paternalistic, shared- and informed-choice models of decision making about treatment based on decisional roles and information exchange. Results. Most participants (75%) perceived collaborative/active involvement in decision making. Agreement (Kendall's tau-b) between self- and researcher-rated decisional roles on the CPS was 0.82, whereas agreement between self-ratings on the CPS and researcher ratings on Charles's classification was 0.60. Charles's classification was difficult if participants had chosen not to take their prescribed medication without being adequately informed about the risky consequences of this decision. Conclusions. In this study, HIV-positive people perceived a high level of involvement in decision making. Reliability and convergent validity of the CPS was high. Charles's classification was problematic because decisional roles and information exchange are distinct dimensions. Some people make risky treatment decisions on their own without being adequately informed. The CPS is a useful instrument to measure decisional role perceptions of HIV-positive people but needs to be complemented by an instrument measuring treatment knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)899-908
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2008

Fingerprint

Decision Making
HIV
Research Personnel
Therapeutics
Reproducibility of Results
Sexual Behavior
Survival

Keywords

  • Antiretroviral treatment
  • Control perception
  • Decision-making
  • HIV
  • Patient involvement
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Measuring the involvement of people with HIV in treatment decision making using the control preferences scale. / Kremer, Heidemarie; Ironson, Gail.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 28, No. 6, 01.11.2008, p. 899-908.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d53e64e07a9f4077ab1ad6b3bb443802,
title = "Measuring the involvement of people with HIV in treatment decision making using the control preferences scale",
abstract = "Objectives. Since 1983, HIV patients have been advocating for participatory decision making. This study measures the involvement that HIV-positive people perceive in treatment decision making. A secondary objective is to assess the validity of the instrument used to examine decisional roles, the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). Method. The authors interviewed 79 HIV-positive people, a sub-sample of a study on long survival with HIV, diverse with respect to ethnicity, age, gender, and sexual orientation. They compared the self- and researcher-rated decisional roles of participants on the CPS. They also assessed how well the CPS corresponds with Charles's paternalistic, shared- and informed-choice models of decision making about treatment based on decisional roles and information exchange. Results. Most participants (75{\%}) perceived collaborative/active involvement in decision making. Agreement (Kendall's tau-b) between self- and researcher-rated decisional roles on the CPS was 0.82, whereas agreement between self-ratings on the CPS and researcher ratings on Charles's classification was 0.60. Charles's classification was difficult if participants had chosen not to take their prescribed medication without being adequately informed about the risky consequences of this decision. Conclusions. In this study, HIV-positive people perceived a high level of involvement in decision making. Reliability and convergent validity of the CPS was high. Charles's classification was problematic because decisional roles and information exchange are distinct dimensions. Some people make risky treatment decisions on their own without being adequately informed. The CPS is a useful instrument to measure decisional role perceptions of HIV-positive people but needs to be complemented by an instrument measuring treatment knowledge.",
keywords = "Antiretroviral treatment, Control perception, Decision-making, HIV, Patient involvement, Validity",
author = "Heidemarie Kremer and Gail Ironson",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X08317014",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "899--908",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the involvement of people with HIV in treatment decision making using the control preferences scale

AU - Kremer, Heidemarie

AU - Ironson, Gail

PY - 2008/11/1

Y1 - 2008/11/1

N2 - Objectives. Since 1983, HIV patients have been advocating for participatory decision making. This study measures the involvement that HIV-positive people perceive in treatment decision making. A secondary objective is to assess the validity of the instrument used to examine decisional roles, the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). Method. The authors interviewed 79 HIV-positive people, a sub-sample of a study on long survival with HIV, diverse with respect to ethnicity, age, gender, and sexual orientation. They compared the self- and researcher-rated decisional roles of participants on the CPS. They also assessed how well the CPS corresponds with Charles's paternalistic, shared- and informed-choice models of decision making about treatment based on decisional roles and information exchange. Results. Most participants (75%) perceived collaborative/active involvement in decision making. Agreement (Kendall's tau-b) between self- and researcher-rated decisional roles on the CPS was 0.82, whereas agreement between self-ratings on the CPS and researcher ratings on Charles's classification was 0.60. Charles's classification was difficult if participants had chosen not to take their prescribed medication without being adequately informed about the risky consequences of this decision. Conclusions. In this study, HIV-positive people perceived a high level of involvement in decision making. Reliability and convergent validity of the CPS was high. Charles's classification was problematic because decisional roles and information exchange are distinct dimensions. Some people make risky treatment decisions on their own without being adequately informed. The CPS is a useful instrument to measure decisional role perceptions of HIV-positive people but needs to be complemented by an instrument measuring treatment knowledge.

AB - Objectives. Since 1983, HIV patients have been advocating for participatory decision making. This study measures the involvement that HIV-positive people perceive in treatment decision making. A secondary objective is to assess the validity of the instrument used to examine decisional roles, the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). Method. The authors interviewed 79 HIV-positive people, a sub-sample of a study on long survival with HIV, diverse with respect to ethnicity, age, gender, and sexual orientation. They compared the self- and researcher-rated decisional roles of participants on the CPS. They also assessed how well the CPS corresponds with Charles's paternalistic, shared- and informed-choice models of decision making about treatment based on decisional roles and information exchange. Results. Most participants (75%) perceived collaborative/active involvement in decision making. Agreement (Kendall's tau-b) between self- and researcher-rated decisional roles on the CPS was 0.82, whereas agreement between self-ratings on the CPS and researcher ratings on Charles's classification was 0.60. Charles's classification was difficult if participants had chosen not to take their prescribed medication without being adequately informed about the risky consequences of this decision. Conclusions. In this study, HIV-positive people perceived a high level of involvement in decision making. Reliability and convergent validity of the CPS was high. Charles's classification was problematic because decisional roles and information exchange are distinct dimensions. Some people make risky treatment decisions on their own without being adequately informed. The CPS is a useful instrument to measure decisional role perceptions of HIV-positive people but needs to be complemented by an instrument measuring treatment knowledge.

KW - Antiretroviral treatment

KW - Control perception

KW - Decision-making

KW - HIV

KW - Patient involvement

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049133587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57049133587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X08317014

DO - 10.1177/0272989X08317014

M3 - Article

C2 - 18757843

AN - SCOPUS:57049133587

VL - 28

SP - 899

EP - 908

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 6

ER -