Measurement of lower limb segmental excursion using inertial sensors during single limb stance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advances in wearable technology have afforded health scientists and clinicians the ability to quantify clinically meaningful kinematic data with performance-based outcome measures in a variety of environments. However, no method for assessing segmental excursion of the lower limb during single limb stance (SLS) with wearable technology has been described in the literature nor has its clinical meaning been explored. This study introduces a clinically friendly measure to quantify lower limb segmental excursion during SLS with inertial measurement units (IMUs) which called the region of limb stability (ROLS). The purpose of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of an IMU-based system versus an optical motion capture system and to determine the effects of knee injury on the ROLS value. Excursion areas of five healthy adults were calculated with the IMU-based system and data were compared with an optical motion capture system. There were high correlations (0.82–0.93) and no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the tested parameters between the optical- and IMU-based systems. The IMU-based method was also implemented in five Division I athletes with knee injuries to determine changes in ROLS due to the injury. The ROLS Symmetry Index value offered a higher sensitivity and specificity to assess the presence of knee impairment than the sacral IMU. Quantified lower limb segmental excursion via IMUs can make better and more precise return-to-sport decisions that would decrease the risk of re-injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Units of measurement
Lower Extremity
Extremities
Sensors
Knee Injuries
Technology
Optical Devices
Wounds and Injuries
Biomechanical Phenomena
Information Systems
Athletes
Sports
Knee
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Kinematics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Health

Keywords

  • Inertial measurement unit
  • Knee injury
  • Lower limb segmental excursion
  • Return-to-sport
  • Single limb stance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{4cd08b6cfec741d4b5e3a914968b0d12,
title = "Measurement of lower limb segmental excursion using inertial sensors during single limb stance",
abstract = "Advances in wearable technology have afforded health scientists and clinicians the ability to quantify clinically meaningful kinematic data with performance-based outcome measures in a variety of environments. However, no method for assessing segmental excursion of the lower limb during single limb stance (SLS) with wearable technology has been described in the literature nor has its clinical meaning been explored. This study introduces a clinically friendly measure to quantify lower limb segmental excursion during SLS with inertial measurement units (IMUs) which called the region of limb stability (ROLS). The purpose of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of an IMU-based system versus an optical motion capture system and to determine the effects of knee injury on the ROLS value. Excursion areas of five healthy adults were calculated with the IMU-based system and data were compared with an optical motion capture system. There were high correlations (0.82–0.93) and no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the tested parameters between the optical- and IMU-based systems. The IMU-based method was also implemented in five Division I athletes with knee injuries to determine changes in ROLS due to the injury. The ROLS Symmetry Index value offered a higher sensitivity and specificity to assess the presence of knee impairment than the sacral IMU. Quantified lower limb segmental excursion via IMUs can make better and more precise return-to-sport decisions that would decrease the risk of re-injury.",
keywords = "Inertial measurement unit, Knee injury, Lower limb segmental excursion, Return-to-sport, Single limb stance",
author = "Kim, {Kyoung Jae} and Agrawal, {Vibhor R} and Christopher Bennett and Ignacio Gaunaurd and Luis Feigenbaum and Robert Gailey",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.042",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of lower limb segmental excursion using inertial sensors during single limb stance

AU - Kim, Kyoung Jae

AU - Agrawal, Vibhor R

AU - Bennett, Christopher

AU - Gaunaurd, Ignacio

AU - Feigenbaum, Luis

AU - Gailey, Robert

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Advances in wearable technology have afforded health scientists and clinicians the ability to quantify clinically meaningful kinematic data with performance-based outcome measures in a variety of environments. However, no method for assessing segmental excursion of the lower limb during single limb stance (SLS) with wearable technology has been described in the literature nor has its clinical meaning been explored. This study introduces a clinically friendly measure to quantify lower limb segmental excursion during SLS with inertial measurement units (IMUs) which called the region of limb stability (ROLS). The purpose of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of an IMU-based system versus an optical motion capture system and to determine the effects of knee injury on the ROLS value. Excursion areas of five healthy adults were calculated with the IMU-based system and data were compared with an optical motion capture system. There were high correlations (0.82–0.93) and no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the tested parameters between the optical- and IMU-based systems. The IMU-based method was also implemented in five Division I athletes with knee injuries to determine changes in ROLS due to the injury. The ROLS Symmetry Index value offered a higher sensitivity and specificity to assess the presence of knee impairment than the sacral IMU. Quantified lower limb segmental excursion via IMUs can make better and more precise return-to-sport decisions that would decrease the risk of re-injury.

AB - Advances in wearable technology have afforded health scientists and clinicians the ability to quantify clinically meaningful kinematic data with performance-based outcome measures in a variety of environments. However, no method for assessing segmental excursion of the lower limb during single limb stance (SLS) with wearable technology has been described in the literature nor has its clinical meaning been explored. This study introduces a clinically friendly measure to quantify lower limb segmental excursion during SLS with inertial measurement units (IMUs) which called the region of limb stability (ROLS). The purpose of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of an IMU-based system versus an optical motion capture system and to determine the effects of knee injury on the ROLS value. Excursion areas of five healthy adults were calculated with the IMU-based system and data were compared with an optical motion capture system. There were high correlations (0.82–0.93) and no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the tested parameters between the optical- and IMU-based systems. The IMU-based method was also implemented in five Division I athletes with knee injuries to determine changes in ROLS due to the injury. The ROLS Symmetry Index value offered a higher sensitivity and specificity to assess the presence of knee impairment than the sacral IMU. Quantified lower limb segmental excursion via IMUs can make better and more precise return-to-sport decisions that would decrease the risk of re-injury.

KW - Inertial measurement unit

KW - Knee injury

KW - Lower limb segmental excursion

KW - Return-to-sport

KW - Single limb stance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042366608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042366608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.042

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.042

M3 - Article

C2 - 29482927

AN - SCOPUS:85042366608

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

ER -