Measurement of intraocular pressure after epikeratophakia

Martha M. Wright, Alana Lee Grajewski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims - To assess the accuracy of three commonly used tonometers in eyes after epikeratophakia. Methods - Five eye bank eyes with sutured epikeratophakia buttons were connected to a manometer and a pressure transducer. Intraocular pressure was adjusted in 5 mmHg increments from 0 to 50 mmHg. The intraocular pressure was measured at each increment using a Goldmann tonometer, a pneumatonometer, and a Tono-pen. Results - The difference between the manometer (actual pressure) and the Goldmann tonometer ranged from -19 to +9 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 2.6 (5.8) mmHg). The pneumatonometer error ranged from -27.5 to +5.5 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 4.7 (6.1) mmHg), and for the Tono-pen the range was -18 to +11 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 0.05 (7.9) mmHg). The correlation coefficients for the three tonometers were 0.94, 0.92, and 0.87 for the Goldmann tonometer, pneumatonometer, and Tono-pen respectively. Conclusion - The Goldmann tonometer had the best correlation with the manometer in eye bank eyes with epikeratophakia (correlation coefficient 0.94), but none of the tonometers was accurate over the entire range of pressures tested. Detection of glaucoma in eyes with epikeratophakia cannot rely on tonometry alone, but requires examination of the optic nerve and visual field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-451
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume81
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1997

Fingerprint

Epikeratophakia
Intraocular Pressure
Eye Banks
Pressure Transducers
Pressure
Manometry
Optic Nerve
Visual Fields
Glaucoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Measurement of intraocular pressure after epikeratophakia. / Wright, Martha M.; Grajewski, Alana Lee.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 81, No. 6, 06.1997, p. 448-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bacd6651fa204357872ae082d906cfe9,
title = "Measurement of intraocular pressure after epikeratophakia",
abstract = "Aims - To assess the accuracy of three commonly used tonometers in eyes after epikeratophakia. Methods - Five eye bank eyes with sutured epikeratophakia buttons were connected to a manometer and a pressure transducer. Intraocular pressure was adjusted in 5 mmHg increments from 0 to 50 mmHg. The intraocular pressure was measured at each increment using a Goldmann tonometer, a pneumatonometer, and a Tono-pen. Results - The difference between the manometer (actual pressure) and the Goldmann tonometer ranged from -19 to +9 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 2.6 (5.8) mmHg). The pneumatonometer error ranged from -27.5 to +5.5 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 4.7 (6.1) mmHg), and for the Tono-pen the range was -18 to +11 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 0.05 (7.9) mmHg). The correlation coefficients for the three tonometers were 0.94, 0.92, and 0.87 for the Goldmann tonometer, pneumatonometer, and Tono-pen respectively. Conclusion - The Goldmann tonometer had the best correlation with the manometer in eye bank eyes with epikeratophakia (correlation coefficient 0.94), but none of the tonometers was accurate over the entire range of pressures tested. Detection of glaucoma in eyes with epikeratophakia cannot rely on tonometry alone, but requires examination of the optic nerve and visual field.",
author = "Wright, {Martha M.} and Grajewski, {Alana Lee}",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "448--451",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of intraocular pressure after epikeratophakia

AU - Wright, Martha M.

AU - Grajewski, Alana Lee

PY - 1997/6

Y1 - 1997/6

N2 - Aims - To assess the accuracy of three commonly used tonometers in eyes after epikeratophakia. Methods - Five eye bank eyes with sutured epikeratophakia buttons were connected to a manometer and a pressure transducer. Intraocular pressure was adjusted in 5 mmHg increments from 0 to 50 mmHg. The intraocular pressure was measured at each increment using a Goldmann tonometer, a pneumatonometer, and a Tono-pen. Results - The difference between the manometer (actual pressure) and the Goldmann tonometer ranged from -19 to +9 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 2.6 (5.8) mmHg). The pneumatonometer error ranged from -27.5 to +5.5 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 4.7 (6.1) mmHg), and for the Tono-pen the range was -18 to +11 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 0.05 (7.9) mmHg). The correlation coefficients for the three tonometers were 0.94, 0.92, and 0.87 for the Goldmann tonometer, pneumatonometer, and Tono-pen respectively. Conclusion - The Goldmann tonometer had the best correlation with the manometer in eye bank eyes with epikeratophakia (correlation coefficient 0.94), but none of the tonometers was accurate over the entire range of pressures tested. Detection of glaucoma in eyes with epikeratophakia cannot rely on tonometry alone, but requires examination of the optic nerve and visual field.

AB - Aims - To assess the accuracy of three commonly used tonometers in eyes after epikeratophakia. Methods - Five eye bank eyes with sutured epikeratophakia buttons were connected to a manometer and a pressure transducer. Intraocular pressure was adjusted in 5 mmHg increments from 0 to 50 mmHg. The intraocular pressure was measured at each increment using a Goldmann tonometer, a pneumatonometer, and a Tono-pen. Results - The difference between the manometer (actual pressure) and the Goldmann tonometer ranged from -19 to +9 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 2.6 (5.8) mmHg). The pneumatonometer error ranged from -27.5 to +5.5 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 4.7 (6.1) mmHg), and for the Tono-pen the range was -18 to +11 mmHg (mean (SD) overestimation 0.05 (7.9) mmHg). The correlation coefficients for the three tonometers were 0.94, 0.92, and 0.87 for the Goldmann tonometer, pneumatonometer, and Tono-pen respectively. Conclusion - The Goldmann tonometer had the best correlation with the manometer in eye bank eyes with epikeratophakia (correlation coefficient 0.94), but none of the tonometers was accurate over the entire range of pressures tested. Detection of glaucoma in eyes with epikeratophakia cannot rely on tonometry alone, but requires examination of the optic nerve and visual field.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030746586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030746586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9274407

AN - SCOPUS:0030746586

VL - 81

SP - 448

EP - 451

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 6

ER -