Meaning and measurement of family: Comment on Gorman-Smith et al. (1996)

Gayle A Dakof

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

D. Gorman-Smith, P. H. Tolan, A. Zelli, & L. R. Huesmann (1996) highlight important issues for the treatment of conduct problems. Their results suggest that the concept of family and the family treatment of serious delinquency should target two dimensions: parenting practices and family characteristics. Additionally, they raise important questions about the meaning, and hence the measurement, of family. The debate articulated in this comment focuses on whether the family is considered to be a collection of individuals with unique perspectives, a unique whole with its own beliefs and emotions, or both a collection of individuals and a whole. In this article, the author argues that family research can be improved if researchers specify three components of the measurement of family: (a) target of the assessment, (b) method of the assessment, and (c) method of aggregation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)142-146
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Family Psychology
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1996

Fingerprint

Parenting
Emotions
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Meaning and measurement of family : Comment on Gorman-Smith et al. (1996). / Dakof, Gayle A.

In: Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 06.1996, p. 142-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{944bd2f48fd24d0ca4adc9bffd140372,
title = "Meaning and measurement of family: Comment on Gorman-Smith et al. (1996)",
abstract = "D. Gorman-Smith, P. H. Tolan, A. Zelli, & L. R. Huesmann (1996) highlight important issues for the treatment of conduct problems. Their results suggest that the concept of family and the family treatment of serious delinquency should target two dimensions: parenting practices and family characteristics. Additionally, they raise important questions about the meaning, and hence the measurement, of family. The debate articulated in this comment focuses on whether the family is considered to be a collection of individuals with unique perspectives, a unique whole with its own beliefs and emotions, or both a collection of individuals and a whole. In this article, the author argues that family research can be improved if researchers specify three components of the measurement of family: (a) target of the assessment, (b) method of the assessment, and (c) method of aggregation.",
author = "Dakof, {Gayle A}",
year = "1996",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037//0893-3200.10.2.142",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "142--146",
journal = "Journal of Family Psychology",
issn = "0893-3200",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meaning and measurement of family

T2 - Comment on Gorman-Smith et al. (1996)

AU - Dakof, Gayle A

PY - 1996/6

Y1 - 1996/6

N2 - D. Gorman-Smith, P. H. Tolan, A. Zelli, & L. R. Huesmann (1996) highlight important issues for the treatment of conduct problems. Their results suggest that the concept of family and the family treatment of serious delinquency should target two dimensions: parenting practices and family characteristics. Additionally, they raise important questions about the meaning, and hence the measurement, of family. The debate articulated in this comment focuses on whether the family is considered to be a collection of individuals with unique perspectives, a unique whole with its own beliefs and emotions, or both a collection of individuals and a whole. In this article, the author argues that family research can be improved if researchers specify three components of the measurement of family: (a) target of the assessment, (b) method of the assessment, and (c) method of aggregation.

AB - D. Gorman-Smith, P. H. Tolan, A. Zelli, & L. R. Huesmann (1996) highlight important issues for the treatment of conduct problems. Their results suggest that the concept of family and the family treatment of serious delinquency should target two dimensions: parenting practices and family characteristics. Additionally, they raise important questions about the meaning, and hence the measurement, of family. The debate articulated in this comment focuses on whether the family is considered to be a collection of individuals with unique perspectives, a unique whole with its own beliefs and emotions, or both a collection of individuals and a whole. In this article, the author argues that family research can be improved if researchers specify three components of the measurement of family: (a) target of the assessment, (b) method of the assessment, and (c) method of aggregation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030487534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030487534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037//0893-3200.10.2.142

DO - 10.1037//0893-3200.10.2.142

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030487534

VL - 10

SP - 142

EP - 146

JO - Journal of Family Psychology

JF - Journal of Family Psychology

SN - 0893-3200

IS - 2

ER -