Matching tomographic IMRT fields with static photon fields

A. Sethi, L. Leybovich, Nesrin Dogan, B. Emami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The matching of abutting radiation fields presents a challenging problem in radiation therapy. Due to sharp penumbra of linear accelerator beams, small (1-2 mm) errors in field positioning can lead to large (>30%) hot or cold spots in the abutment region. With head and neck immobilization devices (thermoplastic mask/aquaplast) an average setup error of 3 mm has been reported. Therefore hot or cold spots approaching 50% of the prescription dose may occur along the matchline. Although abutting radiation fields have been investigated for static fields, there is no reported study regarding matching of tomographic IMRT and static fields. Compared to static fields, the matching of tomographic IMRT fields with static fields is more complicated. Since IMRT and static fields are planned on separate treatment planning computers, the dose in the abutment region is not specified. In addition, commonly used techniques for matching fields, such as feathering of junctions, are not practical. We have developed a method that substantially reduces dose inhomogeneity in the abutment region. In this method, a "buffer zone" around the matchline was created and was included as part of the target for both IMRT and static field plans. In both fields, a small dose gradient (≤3%/mm) in the buffer zone was created. In the IMRT plan, the buffer zone was divided into three sections with dose varying from 83% to 25% of prescription dose. The static field dose profile was modified using either a specially designed physical (hard) or a dynamic (soft) wedge. When these modified fields were matched, the combined dose in the abutment region varied by ≤ 10% in the presence of setup errors spanning 4 mm (±2 mm) when the hard wedge was used and 10 mm (±5 mm) with the soft wedge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2459-2465
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Physics
Volume28
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Photons
Buffers
Prescriptions
Radiation
Particle Accelerators
Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium
Masks
Immobilization
Neck
Radiotherapy
Head
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • External beam radiotherapy
  • Field matching
  • Film dosimetry
  • IMRT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Matching tomographic IMRT fields with static photon fields. / Sethi, A.; Leybovich, L.; Dogan, Nesrin; Emami, B.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 28, No. 12, 2001, p. 2459-2465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sethi, A, Leybovich, L, Dogan, N & Emami, B 2001, 'Matching tomographic IMRT fields with static photon fields', Medical Physics, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2459-2465. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1418238
Sethi, A. ; Leybovich, L. ; Dogan, Nesrin ; Emami, B. / Matching tomographic IMRT fields with static photon fields. In: Medical Physics. 2001 ; Vol. 28, No. 12. pp. 2459-2465.
@article{f4114da1d7f84db39a92af003064d411,
title = "Matching tomographic IMRT fields with static photon fields",
abstract = "The matching of abutting radiation fields presents a challenging problem in radiation therapy. Due to sharp penumbra of linear accelerator beams, small (1-2 mm) errors in field positioning can lead to large (>30{\%}) hot or cold spots in the abutment region. With head and neck immobilization devices (thermoplastic mask/aquaplast) an average setup error of 3 mm has been reported. Therefore hot or cold spots approaching 50{\%} of the prescription dose may occur along the matchline. Although abutting radiation fields have been investigated for static fields, there is no reported study regarding matching of tomographic IMRT and static fields. Compared to static fields, the matching of tomographic IMRT fields with static fields is more complicated. Since IMRT and static fields are planned on separate treatment planning computers, the dose in the abutment region is not specified. In addition, commonly used techniques for matching fields, such as feathering of junctions, are not practical. We have developed a method that substantially reduces dose inhomogeneity in the abutment region. In this method, a {"}buffer zone{"} around the matchline was created and was included as part of the target for both IMRT and static field plans. In both fields, a small dose gradient (≤3{\%}/mm) in the buffer zone was created. In the IMRT plan, the buffer zone was divided into three sections with dose varying from 83{\%} to 25{\%} of prescription dose. The static field dose profile was modified using either a specially designed physical (hard) or a dynamic (soft) wedge. When these modified fields were matched, the combined dose in the abutment region varied by ≤ 10{\%} in the presence of setup errors spanning 4 mm (±2 mm) when the hard wedge was used and 10 mm (±5 mm) with the soft wedge.",
keywords = "External beam radiotherapy, Field matching, Film dosimetry, IMRT",
author = "A. Sethi and L. Leybovich and Nesrin Dogan and B. Emami",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1118/1.1418238",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "2459--2465",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Matching tomographic IMRT fields with static photon fields

AU - Sethi, A.

AU - Leybovich, L.

AU - Dogan, Nesrin

AU - Emami, B.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The matching of abutting radiation fields presents a challenging problem in radiation therapy. Due to sharp penumbra of linear accelerator beams, small (1-2 mm) errors in field positioning can lead to large (>30%) hot or cold spots in the abutment region. With head and neck immobilization devices (thermoplastic mask/aquaplast) an average setup error of 3 mm has been reported. Therefore hot or cold spots approaching 50% of the prescription dose may occur along the matchline. Although abutting radiation fields have been investigated for static fields, there is no reported study regarding matching of tomographic IMRT and static fields. Compared to static fields, the matching of tomographic IMRT fields with static fields is more complicated. Since IMRT and static fields are planned on separate treatment planning computers, the dose in the abutment region is not specified. In addition, commonly used techniques for matching fields, such as feathering of junctions, are not practical. We have developed a method that substantially reduces dose inhomogeneity in the abutment region. In this method, a "buffer zone" around the matchline was created and was included as part of the target for both IMRT and static field plans. In both fields, a small dose gradient (≤3%/mm) in the buffer zone was created. In the IMRT plan, the buffer zone was divided into three sections with dose varying from 83% to 25% of prescription dose. The static field dose profile was modified using either a specially designed physical (hard) or a dynamic (soft) wedge. When these modified fields were matched, the combined dose in the abutment region varied by ≤ 10% in the presence of setup errors spanning 4 mm (±2 mm) when the hard wedge was used and 10 mm (±5 mm) with the soft wedge.

AB - The matching of abutting radiation fields presents a challenging problem in radiation therapy. Due to sharp penumbra of linear accelerator beams, small (1-2 mm) errors in field positioning can lead to large (>30%) hot or cold spots in the abutment region. With head and neck immobilization devices (thermoplastic mask/aquaplast) an average setup error of 3 mm has been reported. Therefore hot or cold spots approaching 50% of the prescription dose may occur along the matchline. Although abutting radiation fields have been investigated for static fields, there is no reported study regarding matching of tomographic IMRT and static fields. Compared to static fields, the matching of tomographic IMRT fields with static fields is more complicated. Since IMRT and static fields are planned on separate treatment planning computers, the dose in the abutment region is not specified. In addition, commonly used techniques for matching fields, such as feathering of junctions, are not practical. We have developed a method that substantially reduces dose inhomogeneity in the abutment region. In this method, a "buffer zone" around the matchline was created and was included as part of the target for both IMRT and static field plans. In both fields, a small dose gradient (≤3%/mm) in the buffer zone was created. In the IMRT plan, the buffer zone was divided into three sections with dose varying from 83% to 25% of prescription dose. The static field dose profile was modified using either a specially designed physical (hard) or a dynamic (soft) wedge. When these modified fields were matched, the combined dose in the abutment region varied by ≤ 10% in the presence of setup errors spanning 4 mm (±2 mm) when the hard wedge was used and 10 mm (±5 mm) with the soft wedge.

KW - External beam radiotherapy

KW - Field matching

KW - Film dosimetry

KW - IMRT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035667298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035667298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1418238

DO - 10.1118/1.1418238

M3 - Article

C2 - 11797949

AN - SCOPUS:0035667298

VL - 28

SP - 2459

EP - 2465

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 12

ER -