Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: Effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury

Kristina S. Beekhuizen, Edelle C. Field-Fote

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To determine the effect of massed practice (MP) versus massed practice combined with somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS) on cortical plasticity and function in persons with incomplete tetraplegia. Methods. Ten subjects were assigned to either MP or MP+SS. Median nerve stimulation (500 ms train, 10 Hz, 1 ms pulse duration) was delivered at the intensity eliciting a motor threshold response. Training sessions were 5 d/week for 3 weeks at 2 h/session. Outcome measures included 1) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), motor threshold (MT) and MEP amplitude at 1.2x MT; 2) maximal pinch grip force; 3) Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Jebsen Hand Function Test. Results. The MP+SS group demonstrated significant improvements (P < 0.05) in pinch grip strength (190%), WMFT scores (52%), and Jebsen test scores (33%), whereas the MP group demonstrated significant improvement (P < 0.05) only in Jebsen test scores (11%). No significant changes were detected in cortical excitability in the MP+SS or MP group. Conclusions. The findings of this preliminary study suggest that MP+SS results in greater increases in pinch strength and timed functional test scores than MP. Optimal stimulation paradigms and training methods are needed to further test this strategy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-45
Number of pages13
JournalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2005

Fingerprint

Pinch Strength
Motor Evoked Potentials
Hand Strength
Spinal Cord Injuries
Upper Extremity
Quadriplegia
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Median Nerve
Hand
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Cervical Cord

Keywords

  • Constraint-induced therapy
  • Electrical stimulation
  • Exercise
  • Hand function
  • Rehabilitation
  • SCI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation : Effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. / Beekhuizen, Kristina S.; Field-Fote, Edelle C.

In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.03.2005, p. 33-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{068cd840060243d4888677379256a334,
title = "Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: Effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury",
abstract = "Objective. To determine the effect of massed practice (MP) versus massed practice combined with somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS) on cortical plasticity and function in persons with incomplete tetraplegia. Methods. Ten subjects were assigned to either MP or MP+SS. Median nerve stimulation (500 ms train, 10 Hz, 1 ms pulse duration) was delivered at the intensity eliciting a motor threshold response. Training sessions were 5 d/week for 3 weeks at 2 h/session. Outcome measures included 1) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), motor threshold (MT) and MEP amplitude at 1.2x MT; 2) maximal pinch grip force; 3) Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Jebsen Hand Function Test. Results. The MP+SS group demonstrated significant improvements (P < 0.05) in pinch grip strength (190{\%}), WMFT scores (52{\%}), and Jebsen test scores (33{\%}), whereas the MP group demonstrated significant improvement (P < 0.05) only in Jebsen test scores (11{\%}). No significant changes were detected in cortical excitability in the MP+SS or MP group. Conclusions. The findings of this preliminary study suggest that MP+SS results in greater increases in pinch strength and timed functional test scores than MP. Optimal stimulation paradigms and training methods are needed to further test this strategy.",
keywords = "Constraint-induced therapy, Electrical stimulation, Exercise, Hand function, Rehabilitation, SCI",
author = "Beekhuizen, {Kristina S.} and Field-Fote, {Edelle C.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1545968305274517",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "33--45",
journal = "Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation",
issn = "1545-9683",
publisher = "Sage Science Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation

T2 - Effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury

AU - Beekhuizen, Kristina S.

AU - Field-Fote, Edelle C.

PY - 2005/3/1

Y1 - 2005/3/1

N2 - Objective. To determine the effect of massed practice (MP) versus massed practice combined with somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS) on cortical plasticity and function in persons with incomplete tetraplegia. Methods. Ten subjects were assigned to either MP or MP+SS. Median nerve stimulation (500 ms train, 10 Hz, 1 ms pulse duration) was delivered at the intensity eliciting a motor threshold response. Training sessions were 5 d/week for 3 weeks at 2 h/session. Outcome measures included 1) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), motor threshold (MT) and MEP amplitude at 1.2x MT; 2) maximal pinch grip force; 3) Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Jebsen Hand Function Test. Results. The MP+SS group demonstrated significant improvements (P < 0.05) in pinch grip strength (190%), WMFT scores (52%), and Jebsen test scores (33%), whereas the MP group demonstrated significant improvement (P < 0.05) only in Jebsen test scores (11%). No significant changes were detected in cortical excitability in the MP+SS or MP group. Conclusions. The findings of this preliminary study suggest that MP+SS results in greater increases in pinch strength and timed functional test scores than MP. Optimal stimulation paradigms and training methods are needed to further test this strategy.

AB - Objective. To determine the effect of massed practice (MP) versus massed practice combined with somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS) on cortical plasticity and function in persons with incomplete tetraplegia. Methods. Ten subjects were assigned to either MP or MP+SS. Median nerve stimulation (500 ms train, 10 Hz, 1 ms pulse duration) was delivered at the intensity eliciting a motor threshold response. Training sessions were 5 d/week for 3 weeks at 2 h/session. Outcome measures included 1) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), motor threshold (MT) and MEP amplitude at 1.2x MT; 2) maximal pinch grip force; 3) Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Jebsen Hand Function Test. Results. The MP+SS group demonstrated significant improvements (P < 0.05) in pinch grip strength (190%), WMFT scores (52%), and Jebsen test scores (33%), whereas the MP group demonstrated significant improvement (P < 0.05) only in Jebsen test scores (11%). No significant changes were detected in cortical excitability in the MP+SS or MP group. Conclusions. The findings of this preliminary study suggest that MP+SS results in greater increases in pinch strength and timed functional test scores than MP. Optimal stimulation paradigms and training methods are needed to further test this strategy.

KW - Constraint-induced therapy

KW - Electrical stimulation

KW - Exercise

KW - Hand function

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - SCI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844314801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13844314801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1545968305274517

DO - 10.1177/1545968305274517

M3 - Article

C2 - 15673842

AN - SCOPUS:13844314801

VL - 19

SP - 33

EP - 45

JO - Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation

SN - 1545-9683

IS - 1

ER -