Marketing trends impede conceptual integration in psychology courses: Comment on gurung et al. (2016)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

A recent American Psychologist article on teaching (Gurung et al., 2016) stressed the importance of fostering integration across topic areas. A current trend in publishing and marketing of textbooks is creating pressure that makes this goal harder to implement. The trend is offering custom tailoring of online texts by adopters, letting instructors assign some sections and make other sections unavailable to students. To permit this option, textbook publishers now insist that authors not cross-reference anywhere, so that no instructor will face the possibility of a student looking for material that has not been assigned and thus does not exist. Ironically, this pressure from publishers actively impedes conceptual integration in our textbooks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)176-177
Number of pages2
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume72
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Textbooks
Marketing
Psychology
Students
Pressure
Foster Home Care
Teaching
Conceptual Integration
Instructor

Keywords

  • Integration
  • Linkage
  • Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Marketing trends impede conceptual integration in psychology courses : Comment on gurung et al. (2016). / Carver, Charles S.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 72, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 176-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{37a949a5ea344b6c90ca7bc702453c8a,
title = "Marketing trends impede conceptual integration in psychology courses: Comment on gurung et al. (2016)",
abstract = "A recent American Psychologist article on teaching (Gurung et al., 2016) stressed the importance of fostering integration across topic areas. A current trend in publishing and marketing of textbooks is creating pressure that makes this goal harder to implement. The trend is offering custom tailoring of online texts by adopters, letting instructors assign some sections and make other sections unavailable to students. To permit this option, textbook publishers now insist that authors not cross-reference anywhere, so that no instructor will face the possibility of a student looking for material that has not been assigned and thus does not exist. Ironically, this pressure from publishers actively impedes conceptual integration in our textbooks.",
keywords = "Integration, Linkage, Teaching",
author = "Carver, {Charles S}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/amp0000033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "176--177",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marketing trends impede conceptual integration in psychology courses

T2 - Comment on gurung et al. (2016)

AU - Carver, Charles S

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - A recent American Psychologist article on teaching (Gurung et al., 2016) stressed the importance of fostering integration across topic areas. A current trend in publishing and marketing of textbooks is creating pressure that makes this goal harder to implement. The trend is offering custom tailoring of online texts by adopters, letting instructors assign some sections and make other sections unavailable to students. To permit this option, textbook publishers now insist that authors not cross-reference anywhere, so that no instructor will face the possibility of a student looking for material that has not been assigned and thus does not exist. Ironically, this pressure from publishers actively impedes conceptual integration in our textbooks.

AB - A recent American Psychologist article on teaching (Gurung et al., 2016) stressed the importance of fostering integration across topic areas. A current trend in publishing and marketing of textbooks is creating pressure that makes this goal harder to implement. The trend is offering custom tailoring of online texts by adopters, letting instructors assign some sections and make other sections unavailable to students. To permit this option, textbook publishers now insist that authors not cross-reference anywhere, so that no instructor will face the possibility of a student looking for material that has not been assigned and thus does not exist. Ironically, this pressure from publishers actively impedes conceptual integration in our textbooks.

KW - Integration

KW - Linkage

KW - Teaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013421290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013421290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/amp0000033

DO - 10.1037/amp0000033

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 28221070

AN - SCOPUS:85013421290

VL - 72

SP - 176

EP - 177

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 2

ER -