Management patterns of gastric polyps in the United States

Juan E. Corral, Tara Keihanian, Liege I. Diaz, Douglas R. Morgan, Daniel A Sussman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Recent guidelines on endoscopic sampling recommend complete gastric polyp removal for solitary fundic polyps >10 mm, hyperplastic polyps >5 mm and all adenomatous polyps. We aim to describe endoscopic approach to polyps in the time period prior to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines and to identify opportunities for clinical practice improvements. Design Retrospective review of the Clinical Outcome Research Initiative (CORI) database, including all oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs). Reviewers grouped interventions during procedures based on instruments used for polyp sampling by forceps or snare polypectomy. Logistic regression estimated the effect of variables of interest on method of polypectomy. Results Of 783 037 OGDs reported in the CORI database, 25 670 (3.3%) described gastric polyps and met the inclusion criteria. Mean gastric polyp size was 6.5±4.9 mm, and 46.2% and 14.5% were located in the corpus and antrum, respectively. Polyps in the forceps group were smaller than polyps in the snare group (5.7±4.0 mm vs 9.3±6.4 mm, respectively, p<0.001). We identified 1056 polyps (41.3%) >10 mm that only underwent forceps biopsy. Forceps were used more frequently in the gastric fundus. Conclusions Snare polypectomy was underused in gastric polyps, per current ASGE guidelines. Anatomical location and endoscopic features of polyps were important predictors of the approach to gastric polypectomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-23
Number of pages8
JournalFrontline Gastroenterology
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Polyps
Stomach
Surgical Instruments
Digestive System Endoscopy
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Guidelines
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Gastric Fundus
Adenomatous Polyps
Logistic Models
Biopsy

Keywords

  • endoscopic polypectomy
  • gastric pre-cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Management patterns of gastric polyps in the United States. / Corral, Juan E.; Keihanian, Tara; Diaz, Liege I.; Morgan, Douglas R.; Sussman, Daniel A.

In: Frontline Gastroenterology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 16-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Corral, Juan E. ; Keihanian, Tara ; Diaz, Liege I. ; Morgan, Douglas R. ; Sussman, Daniel A. / Management patterns of gastric polyps in the United States. In: Frontline Gastroenterology. 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 16-23.
@article{37c5b769ecc74d4a9c71bb5d86596563,
title = "Management patterns of gastric polyps in the United States",
abstract = "Objective Recent guidelines on endoscopic sampling recommend complete gastric polyp removal for solitary fundic polyps >10 mm, hyperplastic polyps >5 mm and all adenomatous polyps. We aim to describe endoscopic approach to polyps in the time period prior to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines and to identify opportunities for clinical practice improvements. Design Retrospective review of the Clinical Outcome Research Initiative (CORI) database, including all oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs). Reviewers grouped interventions during procedures based on instruments used for polyp sampling by forceps or snare polypectomy. Logistic regression estimated the effect of variables of interest on method of polypectomy. Results Of 783 037 OGDs reported in the CORI database, 25 670 (3.3{\%}) described gastric polyps and met the inclusion criteria. Mean gastric polyp size was 6.5±4.9 mm, and 46.2{\%} and 14.5{\%} were located in the corpus and antrum, respectively. Polyps in the forceps group were smaller than polyps in the snare group (5.7±4.0 mm vs 9.3±6.4 mm, respectively, p<0.001). We identified 1056 polyps (41.3{\%}) >10 mm that only underwent forceps biopsy. Forceps were used more frequently in the gastric fundus. Conclusions Snare polypectomy was underused in gastric polyps, per current ASGE guidelines. Anatomical location and endoscopic features of polyps were important predictors of the approach to gastric polypectomy.",
keywords = "endoscopic polypectomy, gastric pre-cancer",
author = "Corral, {Juan E.} and Tara Keihanian and Diaz, {Liege I.} and Morgan, {Douglas R.} and Sussman, {Daniel A}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/flgastro-2017-100941",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "16--23",
journal = "Frontline Gastroenterology",
issn = "2041-4137",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management patterns of gastric polyps in the United States

AU - Corral, Juan E.

AU - Keihanian, Tara

AU - Diaz, Liege I.

AU - Morgan, Douglas R.

AU - Sussman, Daniel A

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective Recent guidelines on endoscopic sampling recommend complete gastric polyp removal for solitary fundic polyps >10 mm, hyperplastic polyps >5 mm and all adenomatous polyps. We aim to describe endoscopic approach to polyps in the time period prior to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines and to identify opportunities for clinical practice improvements. Design Retrospective review of the Clinical Outcome Research Initiative (CORI) database, including all oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs). Reviewers grouped interventions during procedures based on instruments used for polyp sampling by forceps or snare polypectomy. Logistic regression estimated the effect of variables of interest on method of polypectomy. Results Of 783 037 OGDs reported in the CORI database, 25 670 (3.3%) described gastric polyps and met the inclusion criteria. Mean gastric polyp size was 6.5±4.9 mm, and 46.2% and 14.5% were located in the corpus and antrum, respectively. Polyps in the forceps group were smaller than polyps in the snare group (5.7±4.0 mm vs 9.3±6.4 mm, respectively, p<0.001). We identified 1056 polyps (41.3%) >10 mm that only underwent forceps biopsy. Forceps were used more frequently in the gastric fundus. Conclusions Snare polypectomy was underused in gastric polyps, per current ASGE guidelines. Anatomical location and endoscopic features of polyps were important predictors of the approach to gastric polypectomy.

AB - Objective Recent guidelines on endoscopic sampling recommend complete gastric polyp removal for solitary fundic polyps >10 mm, hyperplastic polyps >5 mm and all adenomatous polyps. We aim to describe endoscopic approach to polyps in the time period prior to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines and to identify opportunities for clinical practice improvements. Design Retrospective review of the Clinical Outcome Research Initiative (CORI) database, including all oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs). Reviewers grouped interventions during procedures based on instruments used for polyp sampling by forceps or snare polypectomy. Logistic regression estimated the effect of variables of interest on method of polypectomy. Results Of 783 037 OGDs reported in the CORI database, 25 670 (3.3%) described gastric polyps and met the inclusion criteria. Mean gastric polyp size was 6.5±4.9 mm, and 46.2% and 14.5% were located in the corpus and antrum, respectively. Polyps in the forceps group were smaller than polyps in the snare group (5.7±4.0 mm vs 9.3±6.4 mm, respectively, p<0.001). We identified 1056 polyps (41.3%) >10 mm that only underwent forceps biopsy. Forceps were used more frequently in the gastric fundus. Conclusions Snare polypectomy was underused in gastric polyps, per current ASGE guidelines. Anatomical location and endoscopic features of polyps were important predictors of the approach to gastric polypectomy.

KW - endoscopic polypectomy

KW - gastric pre-cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058464994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058464994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100941

DO - 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100941

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058464994

VL - 10

SP - 16

EP - 23

JO - Frontline Gastroenterology

JF - Frontline Gastroenterology

SN - 2041-4137

IS - 1

ER -