Management of recurrent inguinal hernias after total extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphies

Emanuele Lo Menzo, Seth Spector, Alberto Iglesias, Jose M Martinez, Jorge Huaco, Vincent DeGennaro, Atul K. Madan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The laparoscopic repair offers clear advantages in recurrent inguinal hernias after open herniorrhaphy. Less clear is the role of laparoscopy for recurrences after previous laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies. In this paper, we present our experience with both laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair of laparoscopic recurrences. Methods: All patients who had undergone repair of recurrences after previous laparoscopic hernia repair from July 2004 to July 2007 were included in this study. Charts were reviewed for all these patients. Results: Six patients were diagnosed with 7 recurrent inguinal hernias after laparoscopic repairs. All the initial laparoscopic repairs, except for one, were total preperitoneal (TEP) with the placement of lightweight polypropylene mesh. The average time from the initial repair to the diagnosis of recurrence was 20 months (range 3-84). Four of the 7 recurrences were treated with a laparoscopic approach. The other three recurrences were repaired in an open fashion as per the preoperative plan. In 2 of the laparoscopic cases, the peritoneal flap was not able to cover the mesh, so a tissue-separating mesh with fibrin sealant was utilized to cover the myopectineal orifice. No intra- or postoperative complications were recorded. There were no recurrences at an average follow-up of 14 months (range, 11-17). Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair can be offered to those patients with a recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair. Further studies comparing laparoscopic repair versus open repair of recurrences after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will be helpful in defining the best approach when encountering these recurrences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)475-478
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2009

Fingerprint

Inguinal Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Recurrence
Fibrin Tissue Adhesive
Groin
Polypropylenes
Intraoperative Complications
Laparoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Management of recurrent inguinal hernias after total extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphies. / Menzo, Emanuele Lo; Spector, Seth; Iglesias, Alberto; Martinez, Jose M; Huaco, Jorge; DeGennaro, Vincent; Madan, Atul K.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.08.2009, p. 475-478.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Menzo, Emanuele Lo ; Spector, Seth ; Iglesias, Alberto ; Martinez, Jose M ; Huaco, Jorge ; DeGennaro, Vincent ; Madan, Atul K. / Management of recurrent inguinal hernias after total extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphies. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2009 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 475-478.
@article{1192084e344744008c2fd286e02da16b,
title = "Management of recurrent inguinal hernias after total extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphies",
abstract = "Introduction: The laparoscopic repair offers clear advantages in recurrent inguinal hernias after open herniorrhaphy. Less clear is the role of laparoscopy for recurrences after previous laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies. In this paper, we present our experience with both laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair of laparoscopic recurrences. Methods: All patients who had undergone repair of recurrences after previous laparoscopic hernia repair from July 2004 to July 2007 were included in this study. Charts were reviewed for all these patients. Results: Six patients were diagnosed with 7 recurrent inguinal hernias after laparoscopic repairs. All the initial laparoscopic repairs, except for one, were total preperitoneal (TEP) with the placement of lightweight polypropylene mesh. The average time from the initial repair to the diagnosis of recurrence was 20 months (range 3-84). Four of the 7 recurrences were treated with a laparoscopic approach. The other three recurrences were repaired in an open fashion as per the preoperative plan. In 2 of the laparoscopic cases, the peritoneal flap was not able to cover the mesh, so a tissue-separating mesh with fibrin sealant was utilized to cover the myopectineal orifice. No intra- or postoperative complications were recorded. There were no recurrences at an average follow-up of 14 months (range, 11-17). Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair can be offered to those patients with a recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair. Further studies comparing laparoscopic repair versus open repair of recurrences after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will be helpful in defining the best approach when encountering these recurrences.",
author = "Menzo, {Emanuele Lo} and Seth Spector and Alberto Iglesias and Martinez, {Jose M} and Jorge Huaco and Vincent DeGennaro and Madan, {Atul K.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/lap.2008.0408",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "475--478",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques",
issn = "1092-6429",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of recurrent inguinal hernias after total extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphies

AU - Menzo, Emanuele Lo

AU - Spector, Seth

AU - Iglesias, Alberto

AU - Martinez, Jose M

AU - Huaco, Jorge

AU - DeGennaro, Vincent

AU - Madan, Atul K.

PY - 2009/8/1

Y1 - 2009/8/1

N2 - Introduction: The laparoscopic repair offers clear advantages in recurrent inguinal hernias after open herniorrhaphy. Less clear is the role of laparoscopy for recurrences after previous laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies. In this paper, we present our experience with both laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair of laparoscopic recurrences. Methods: All patients who had undergone repair of recurrences after previous laparoscopic hernia repair from July 2004 to July 2007 were included in this study. Charts were reviewed for all these patients. Results: Six patients were diagnosed with 7 recurrent inguinal hernias after laparoscopic repairs. All the initial laparoscopic repairs, except for one, were total preperitoneal (TEP) with the placement of lightweight polypropylene mesh. The average time from the initial repair to the diagnosis of recurrence was 20 months (range 3-84). Four of the 7 recurrences were treated with a laparoscopic approach. The other three recurrences were repaired in an open fashion as per the preoperative plan. In 2 of the laparoscopic cases, the peritoneal flap was not able to cover the mesh, so a tissue-separating mesh with fibrin sealant was utilized to cover the myopectineal orifice. No intra- or postoperative complications were recorded. There were no recurrences at an average follow-up of 14 months (range, 11-17). Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair can be offered to those patients with a recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair. Further studies comparing laparoscopic repair versus open repair of recurrences after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will be helpful in defining the best approach when encountering these recurrences.

AB - Introduction: The laparoscopic repair offers clear advantages in recurrent inguinal hernias after open herniorrhaphy. Less clear is the role of laparoscopy for recurrences after previous laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies. In this paper, we present our experience with both laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair of laparoscopic recurrences. Methods: All patients who had undergone repair of recurrences after previous laparoscopic hernia repair from July 2004 to July 2007 were included in this study. Charts were reviewed for all these patients. Results: Six patients were diagnosed with 7 recurrent inguinal hernias after laparoscopic repairs. All the initial laparoscopic repairs, except for one, were total preperitoneal (TEP) with the placement of lightweight polypropylene mesh. The average time from the initial repair to the diagnosis of recurrence was 20 months (range 3-84). Four of the 7 recurrences were treated with a laparoscopic approach. The other three recurrences were repaired in an open fashion as per the preoperative plan. In 2 of the laparoscopic cases, the peritoneal flap was not able to cover the mesh, so a tissue-separating mesh with fibrin sealant was utilized to cover the myopectineal orifice. No intra- or postoperative complications were recorded. There were no recurrences at an average follow-up of 14 months (range, 11-17). Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair can be offered to those patients with a recurrence after a previous laparoscopic repair. Further studies comparing laparoscopic repair versus open repair of recurrences after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will be helpful in defining the best approach when encountering these recurrences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249098921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69249098921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/lap.2008.0408

DO - 10.1089/lap.2008.0408

M3 - Article

C2 - 19670974

AN - SCOPUS:69249098921

VL - 19

SP - 475

EP - 478

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

SN - 1092-6429

IS - 4

ER -