Male response to an aggressive visual signal, the wing wave display, in swamp sparrows

R. C. Anderson, A. L. DuBois, D. K. Piech, William Searcy, S. Nowicki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Signaling often involves complex suites of behaviors that incorporate different sensory modalities. Whatever modality is used to establish that a signal functions in communication researchers must demonstrate that receivers respond to it. The territory defense response of male swamp sparrows involves a variety of behaviors that includes both vocal and visual displays. One of these, the "wing wave" display, is a distinctive movement that predicts physical attack. Here, we use robotic taxidermic mounts paired with song to test the hypothesis that wing waving is a signal and, specifically, that male receivers respond to wing waving as a signal of aggressive intent. As predicted, subjects responded more aggressively to the mount during wing waving trials than during stationary trials. A second experiment demonstrated that this effect cannot be attributed simply to increased attention to movement. Less expectedly, subjects did not alter their own display behavior in response to wing waving as compared to a static mount. We conclude that the wing wave display in the context of singing is a signal that functions in male-male aggressive communication. Questions remain, including whether wing waving functions as a signal in the absence of singing and whether wing waving and song are redundant signals or communicate different information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)593-600
Number of pages8
JournalBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Volume67
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 24 2013

Fingerprint

swamp
animal communication
song
communication
display behavior
Melospiza georgiana
robotics
communication (human)
researchers

Keywords

  • Aggressive signal
  • Animal communication
  • Animal robot
  • Swamp sparrow
  • Visual display
  • Wing wave

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Male response to an aggressive visual signal, the wing wave display, in swamp sparrows. / Anderson, R. C.; DuBois, A. L.; Piech, D. K.; Searcy, William; Nowicki, S.

In: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 67, No. 4, 24.01.2013, p. 593-600.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anderson, R. C. ; DuBois, A. L. ; Piech, D. K. ; Searcy, William ; Nowicki, S. / Male response to an aggressive visual signal, the wing wave display, in swamp sparrows. In: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2013 ; Vol. 67, No. 4. pp. 593-600.
@article{8ada99cd32704f1abdf42ab300988e83,
title = "Male response to an aggressive visual signal, the wing wave display, in swamp sparrows",
abstract = "Signaling often involves complex suites of behaviors that incorporate different sensory modalities. Whatever modality is used to establish that a signal functions in communication researchers must demonstrate that receivers respond to it. The territory defense response of male swamp sparrows involves a variety of behaviors that includes both vocal and visual displays. One of these, the {"}wing wave{"} display, is a distinctive movement that predicts physical attack. Here, we use robotic taxidermic mounts paired with song to test the hypothesis that wing waving is a signal and, specifically, that male receivers respond to wing waving as a signal of aggressive intent. As predicted, subjects responded more aggressively to the mount during wing waving trials than during stationary trials. A second experiment demonstrated that this effect cannot be attributed simply to increased attention to movement. Less expectedly, subjects did not alter their own display behavior in response to wing waving as compared to a static mount. We conclude that the wing wave display in the context of singing is a signal that functions in male-male aggressive communication. Questions remain, including whether wing waving functions as a signal in the absence of singing and whether wing waving and song are redundant signals or communicate different information.",
keywords = "Aggressive signal, Animal communication, Animal robot, Swamp sparrow, Visual display, Wing wave",
author = "Anderson, {R. C.} and DuBois, {A. L.} and Piech, {D. K.} and William Searcy and S. Nowicki",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1007/s00265-013-1478-9",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "593--600",
journal = "Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology",
issn = "0340-5443",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Male response to an aggressive visual signal, the wing wave display, in swamp sparrows

AU - Anderson, R. C.

AU - DuBois, A. L.

AU - Piech, D. K.

AU - Searcy, William

AU - Nowicki, S.

PY - 2013/1/24

Y1 - 2013/1/24

N2 - Signaling often involves complex suites of behaviors that incorporate different sensory modalities. Whatever modality is used to establish that a signal functions in communication researchers must demonstrate that receivers respond to it. The territory defense response of male swamp sparrows involves a variety of behaviors that includes both vocal and visual displays. One of these, the "wing wave" display, is a distinctive movement that predicts physical attack. Here, we use robotic taxidermic mounts paired with song to test the hypothesis that wing waving is a signal and, specifically, that male receivers respond to wing waving as a signal of aggressive intent. As predicted, subjects responded more aggressively to the mount during wing waving trials than during stationary trials. A second experiment demonstrated that this effect cannot be attributed simply to increased attention to movement. Less expectedly, subjects did not alter their own display behavior in response to wing waving as compared to a static mount. We conclude that the wing wave display in the context of singing is a signal that functions in male-male aggressive communication. Questions remain, including whether wing waving functions as a signal in the absence of singing and whether wing waving and song are redundant signals or communicate different information.

AB - Signaling often involves complex suites of behaviors that incorporate different sensory modalities. Whatever modality is used to establish that a signal functions in communication researchers must demonstrate that receivers respond to it. The territory defense response of male swamp sparrows involves a variety of behaviors that includes both vocal and visual displays. One of these, the "wing wave" display, is a distinctive movement that predicts physical attack. Here, we use robotic taxidermic mounts paired with song to test the hypothesis that wing waving is a signal and, specifically, that male receivers respond to wing waving as a signal of aggressive intent. As predicted, subjects responded more aggressively to the mount during wing waving trials than during stationary trials. A second experiment demonstrated that this effect cannot be attributed simply to increased attention to movement. Less expectedly, subjects did not alter their own display behavior in response to wing waving as compared to a static mount. We conclude that the wing wave display in the context of singing is a signal that functions in male-male aggressive communication. Questions remain, including whether wing waving functions as a signal in the absence of singing and whether wing waving and song are redundant signals or communicate different information.

KW - Aggressive signal

KW - Animal communication

KW - Animal robot

KW - Swamp sparrow

KW - Visual display

KW - Wing wave

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874930262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874930262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00265-013-1478-9

DO - 10.1007/s00265-013-1478-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84874930262

VL - 67

SP - 593

EP - 600

JO - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

JF - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

SN - 0340-5443

IS - 4

ER -