MAKING WORK PAY FOR WELFARE RECIPIENTS

David H. Greenberg, Charles H. Michalopoulos, Philip Robins, Robert H. Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes five new welfare reform programs being tested in six areas of the United States and Canada. These programs all use financial incentives to encourage selfsufficiency among welfare recipients. Some programs also provide employment and training services. A microsimulation model is used to predict the impacts of the two most generous programs: the Canadian Self‐Sufficiency Project (SSP) and the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP). The simulation results suggest that SSP and MFIP will modestly increase the number of welfare recipients who work. However, because SSP has a fulltime work requirement and MFIP does not, only SSP is predicted to generate an increase in fulltime employment

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-52
Number of pages14
JournalContemporary Economic Policy
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

welfare recipient
reform program
welfare
incentive
Canada
simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Administration

Cite this

MAKING WORK PAY FOR WELFARE RECIPIENTS. / Greenberg, David H.; Michalopoulos, Charles H.; Robins, Philip; Wood, Robert H.

In: Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.01.1995, p. 39-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greenberg, David H. ; Michalopoulos, Charles H. ; Robins, Philip ; Wood, Robert H. / MAKING WORK PAY FOR WELFARE RECIPIENTS. In: Contemporary Economic Policy. 1995 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 39-52.
@article{547881d85b2341569744864cc910b6d9,
title = "MAKING WORK PAY FOR WELFARE RECIPIENTS",
abstract = "This paper describes five new welfare reform programs being tested in six areas of the United States and Canada. These programs all use financial incentives to encourage selfsufficiency among welfare recipients. Some programs also provide employment and training services. A microsimulation model is used to predict the impacts of the two most generous programs: the Canadian Self‐Sufficiency Project (SSP) and the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP). The simulation results suggest that SSP and MFIP will modestly increase the number of welfare recipients who work. However, because SSP has a fulltime work requirement and MFIP does not, only SSP is predicted to generate an increase in fulltime employment",
author = "Greenberg, {David H.} and Michalopoulos, {Charles H.} and Philip Robins and Wood, {Robert H.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1465-7287.1995.tb00007.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "39--52",
journal = "Contemporary Economic Policy",
issn = "1074-3529",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MAKING WORK PAY FOR WELFARE RECIPIENTS

AU - Greenberg, David H.

AU - Michalopoulos, Charles H.

AU - Robins, Philip

AU - Wood, Robert H.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - This paper describes five new welfare reform programs being tested in six areas of the United States and Canada. These programs all use financial incentives to encourage selfsufficiency among welfare recipients. Some programs also provide employment and training services. A microsimulation model is used to predict the impacts of the two most generous programs: the Canadian Self‐Sufficiency Project (SSP) and the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP). The simulation results suggest that SSP and MFIP will modestly increase the number of welfare recipients who work. However, because SSP has a fulltime work requirement and MFIP does not, only SSP is predicted to generate an increase in fulltime employment

AB - This paper describes five new welfare reform programs being tested in six areas of the United States and Canada. These programs all use financial incentives to encourage selfsufficiency among welfare recipients. Some programs also provide employment and training services. A microsimulation model is used to predict the impacts of the two most generous programs: the Canadian Self‐Sufficiency Project (SSP) and the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP). The simulation results suggest that SSP and MFIP will modestly increase the number of welfare recipients who work. However, because SSP has a fulltime work requirement and MFIP does not, only SSP is predicted to generate an increase in fulltime employment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85005205675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85005205675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1995.tb00007.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1995.tb00007.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85005205675

VL - 13

SP - 39

EP - 52

JO - Contemporary Economic Policy

JF - Contemporary Economic Policy

SN - 1074-3529

IS - 3

ER -