TY - JOUR
T1 - Macular Hole Syndromes
T2 - Echographic Findings with Clinical Correlation
AU - Dugel, Pravin U.
AU - Smiddy, William E.
AU - Byrne, Sandra Frazier
AU - Hughes, J. Randall
AU - Gass, J. Donald M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Originally received: August 30, 1993. Revision accepted: December 6, 1993. From the Department of Ophthalmology Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. Dr. Dugel currently is affiliated with the Doheny Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, Chicago, November 1993. Supported in part by the Heed Foundation Fellowship Award (Dr. Dugel), and the Ronald G. Michels Vitreoretinal Surgery Fellowship Award (Dr. Dugel), and public health service research grant 5VOIEY02549, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Reprint requests to William E. Smiddy, MD, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, P.O. Box 016880, Miami, FL 33101-6880.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - Background: Anatomic characteristics of macular holes may be difficult to define, even with contact lens biomicroscopy. With the advent of successful macular hole surgical techniques, accurate diagnosis has become increasingly important to avoid unnecessary or incorrect surgery. Echography may provide additional diagnostic information in some cases. The purpose of this study is to correlate echographic and intraoperative clinical features of macular holes. Methods: The echographic features and intraoperative findings in 25 patients were compared. The spectrum of identifiable echographic features included (1) a thin, smooth, membrane-like surface minimally elevated over the macula (limited posterior vitreous face separation); (2) macular thickening; (3) an operculum; and (4) a complete posterior vitreous face separation. Intraoperative clinical findings included the presence or absence of (1) a thin, limited posterior vitreous face separation, (2) a subretinal fluid cuff, (3) an operculum, and (4) a complete posterior vitreous face separation. Results: Echographic and intraoperative findings correlated regarding the limited posterior face separation in 23 of 25 patients, a surrounding subretinal fluid cuff (macular thickening) in 24 of 25 patients, an operculum in 19 of 25 patients, and complete posterior vitreous face separation in 24 of 25 patients. Thus, echography was very effective in detecting the position of the posterior vitreous face. Overall, echography correlated accurately with 90 (90%) of 100 of these four features. Conclusion: Echographic features correlate accurately with clinical features.
AB - Background: Anatomic characteristics of macular holes may be difficult to define, even with contact lens biomicroscopy. With the advent of successful macular hole surgical techniques, accurate diagnosis has become increasingly important to avoid unnecessary or incorrect surgery. Echography may provide additional diagnostic information in some cases. The purpose of this study is to correlate echographic and intraoperative clinical features of macular holes. Methods: The echographic features and intraoperative findings in 25 patients were compared. The spectrum of identifiable echographic features included (1) a thin, smooth, membrane-like surface minimally elevated over the macula (limited posterior vitreous face separation); (2) macular thickening; (3) an operculum; and (4) a complete posterior vitreous face separation. Intraoperative clinical findings included the presence or absence of (1) a thin, limited posterior vitreous face separation, (2) a subretinal fluid cuff, (3) an operculum, and (4) a complete posterior vitreous face separation. Results: Echographic and intraoperative findings correlated regarding the limited posterior face separation in 23 of 25 patients, a surrounding subretinal fluid cuff (macular thickening) in 24 of 25 patients, an operculum in 19 of 25 patients, and complete posterior vitreous face separation in 24 of 25 patients. Thus, echography was very effective in detecting the position of the posterior vitreous face. Overall, echography correlated accurately with 90 (90%) of 100 of these four features. Conclusion: Echographic features correlate accurately with clinical features.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028242855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028242855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31253-X
DO - 10.1016/S0161-6420(94)31253-X
M3 - Article
C2 - 8190465
AN - SCOPUS:0028242855
VL - 101
SP - 815
EP - 821
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
SN - 0161-6420
IS - 5
ER -