Macular hole surgery without using adjunctive additives

William E Smiddy, Sergio Pimentel, George A. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of performing surgical techniques for macular holes without using adjunctive additives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was completed of consecutive eyes treated for macular holes of 1 year or less duration that had not had previous vitreous surgery. The best-corrected visual acuity and hole flattening were determined. RESULTS: Postoperative flattening of the hole was achieved in 39 (91%) of 43 eyes, with at least a 50% reduction of the minimum resolvable visual angle (3-line visual increase) in 65% of the eyes and a final vision of 20/40 or better in 40% of the eyes during the follow-up interval (mean 10.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of current macular hole surgical techniques suggests that adjunctive additives may not be necessary for most cases. Thus, new treatment modalities need to be evaluated with carefully controlled studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)713-717
Number of pages5
JournalOphthalmic Surgery and Lasers
Volume28
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1 1997

Fingerprint

Retinal Perforations
Visual Acuity
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Macular hole surgery without using adjunctive additives. / Smiddy, William E; Pimentel, Sergio; Williams, George A.

In: Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, Vol. 28, No. 9, 01.09.1997, p. 713-717.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smiddy, WE, Pimentel, S & Williams, GA 1997, 'Macular hole surgery without using adjunctive additives', Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 713-717.
Smiddy, William E ; Pimentel, Sergio ; Williams, George A. / Macular hole surgery without using adjunctive additives. In: Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers. 1997 ; Vol. 28, No. 9. pp. 713-717.
@article{5e9f8029bd834f85bb5f3cae44d55c8d,
title = "Macular hole surgery without using adjunctive additives",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of performing surgical techniques for macular holes without using adjunctive additives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was completed of consecutive eyes treated for macular holes of 1 year or less duration that had not had previous vitreous surgery. The best-corrected visual acuity and hole flattening were determined. RESULTS: Postoperative flattening of the hole was achieved in 39 (91{\%}) of 43 eyes, with at least a 50{\%} reduction of the minimum resolvable visual angle (3-line visual increase) in 65{\%} of the eyes and a final vision of 20/40 or better in 40{\%} of the eyes during the follow-up interval (mean 10.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of current macular hole surgical techniques suggests that adjunctive additives may not be necessary for most cases. Thus, new treatment modalities need to be evaluated with carefully controlled studies.",
author = "Smiddy, {William E} and Sergio Pimentel and Williams, {George A.}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "713--717",
journal = "Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina",
issn = "2325-8160",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macular hole surgery without using adjunctive additives

AU - Smiddy, William E

AU - Pimentel, Sergio

AU - Williams, George A.

PY - 1997/9/1

Y1 - 1997/9/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of performing surgical techniques for macular holes without using adjunctive additives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was completed of consecutive eyes treated for macular holes of 1 year or less duration that had not had previous vitreous surgery. The best-corrected visual acuity and hole flattening were determined. RESULTS: Postoperative flattening of the hole was achieved in 39 (91%) of 43 eyes, with at least a 50% reduction of the minimum resolvable visual angle (3-line visual increase) in 65% of the eyes and a final vision of 20/40 or better in 40% of the eyes during the follow-up interval (mean 10.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of current macular hole surgical techniques suggests that adjunctive additives may not be necessary for most cases. Thus, new treatment modalities need to be evaluated with carefully controlled studies.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of performing surgical techniques for macular holes without using adjunctive additives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was completed of consecutive eyes treated for macular holes of 1 year or less duration that had not had previous vitreous surgery. The best-corrected visual acuity and hole flattening were determined. RESULTS: Postoperative flattening of the hole was achieved in 39 (91%) of 43 eyes, with at least a 50% reduction of the minimum resolvable visual angle (3-line visual increase) in 65% of the eyes and a final vision of 20/40 or better in 40% of the eyes during the follow-up interval (mean 10.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of current macular hole surgical techniques suggests that adjunctive additives may not be necessary for most cases. Thus, new treatment modalities need to be evaluated with carefully controlled studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030882189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030882189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9304631

AN - SCOPUS:0030882189

VL - 28

SP - 713

EP - 717

JO - Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina

JF - Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina

SN - 2325-8160

IS - 9

ER -