Lusting while loathing: Parallel counterdriving of wanting and liking

Ab Litt, Uzma Khan, Baba Shiv

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We show how being "jilted"-that is, being thwarted from obtaining a desired outcome-can concurrently increase desire to obtain the outcome, but reduce its actual attractiveness. Thus, people can come to both want something more and like it less. Two experiments illustrate such disjunctions following jilting experiences. In Experiment 1, participants who failed to win a prize were willing to pay more for it than those who won it, but were also more likely to trade it away when they ultimately obtained it. In Experiment 2, failure to obtain an expected reward led to increased choice, but also negatively biased evaluation, of an item that was merely similar to that reward. Such disjunctions were exhibited particularly by individuals low in intensity of felt affect, a finding supporting an emotional basis for relative harmonization of wanting and liking. These results demonstrate how dissociable psychological subsystems for wanting and liking can be driven in opposing directions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-125
Number of pages8
JournalPsychological Science
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 29 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reward
Psychology
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Desire
  • Emotions
  • Happiness
  • Wanting and liking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Lusting while loathing : Parallel counterdriving of wanting and liking. / Litt, Ab; Khan, Uzma; Shiv, Baba.

In: Psychological Science, Vol. 21, No. 1, 29.04.2010, p. 118-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cfca6d2aa41a46efa76c421a6fee0f2b,
title = "Lusting while loathing: Parallel counterdriving of wanting and liking",
abstract = "We show how being {"}jilted{"}-that is, being thwarted from obtaining a desired outcome-can concurrently increase desire to obtain the outcome, but reduce its actual attractiveness. Thus, people can come to both want something more and like it less. Two experiments illustrate such disjunctions following jilting experiences. In Experiment 1, participants who failed to win a prize were willing to pay more for it than those who won it, but were also more likely to trade it away when they ultimately obtained it. In Experiment 2, failure to obtain an expected reward led to increased choice, but also negatively biased evaluation, of an item that was merely similar to that reward. Such disjunctions were exhibited particularly by individuals low in intensity of felt affect, a finding supporting an emotional basis for relative harmonization of wanting and liking. These results demonstrate how dissociable psychological subsystems for wanting and liking can be driven in opposing directions.",
keywords = "Decision making, Desire, Emotions, Happiness, Wanting and liking",
author = "Ab Litt and Uzma Khan and Baba Shiv",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1177/0956797609355633",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "118--125",
journal = "Psychological Science",
issn = "0956-7976",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lusting while loathing

T2 - Parallel counterdriving of wanting and liking

AU - Litt, Ab

AU - Khan, Uzma

AU - Shiv, Baba

PY - 2010/4/29

Y1 - 2010/4/29

N2 - We show how being "jilted"-that is, being thwarted from obtaining a desired outcome-can concurrently increase desire to obtain the outcome, but reduce its actual attractiveness. Thus, people can come to both want something more and like it less. Two experiments illustrate such disjunctions following jilting experiences. In Experiment 1, participants who failed to win a prize were willing to pay more for it than those who won it, but were also more likely to trade it away when they ultimately obtained it. In Experiment 2, failure to obtain an expected reward led to increased choice, but also negatively biased evaluation, of an item that was merely similar to that reward. Such disjunctions were exhibited particularly by individuals low in intensity of felt affect, a finding supporting an emotional basis for relative harmonization of wanting and liking. These results demonstrate how dissociable psychological subsystems for wanting and liking can be driven in opposing directions.

AB - We show how being "jilted"-that is, being thwarted from obtaining a desired outcome-can concurrently increase desire to obtain the outcome, but reduce its actual attractiveness. Thus, people can come to both want something more and like it less. Two experiments illustrate such disjunctions following jilting experiences. In Experiment 1, participants who failed to win a prize were willing to pay more for it than those who won it, but were also more likely to trade it away when they ultimately obtained it. In Experiment 2, failure to obtain an expected reward led to increased choice, but also negatively biased evaluation, of an item that was merely similar to that reward. Such disjunctions were exhibited particularly by individuals low in intensity of felt affect, a finding supporting an emotional basis for relative harmonization of wanting and liking. These results demonstrate how dissociable psychological subsystems for wanting and liking can be driven in opposing directions.

KW - Decision making

KW - Desire

KW - Emotions

KW - Happiness

KW - Wanting and liking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951278249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951278249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0956797609355633

DO - 10.1177/0956797609355633

M3 - Article

C2 - 20424032

AN - SCOPUS:77951278249

VL - 21

SP - 118

EP - 125

JO - Psychological Science

JF - Psychological Science

SN - 0956-7976

IS - 1

ER -