Abstract
Background Clinical information may be lost during the transfer of critically injured trauma patients from the emergency department (ED) to the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to investigate the causes and frequency of information discrepancies with handover and to explore solutions to improving information transfer. Methods A mixed-methods research approach was used at our level I trauma centre. Information discrepancies between the ED and the ICU were measured using chart audits. Descriptive, parametric and non-parametric statistics were applied, as appropriate. Six focus groups of 46 ED and ICU nurses and nine individual interviews of trauma team leaders were conducted to explore solutions to improve information transfer using thematic analysis. Results Chart audits demonstrated that injuries were missed in 24% of patients. Clinical information discrepancies occurred in 48% of patients. Patients with these discrepancies were more likely to have unknown medical histories (p<0.001) requiring information rescue (p<0.005). Close to one in three patients with information rescue had a change in clinical management (p<0.01). Participants identified challenges according to their disciplines, with some overlap. Physicians, in contrast to nurses, were perceived as less aware of interdisciplinary stress and their role regarding variability in handover. Standardising handover, increasing non-technical physician training and understanding unit cultures were proposed as solutions, with nurses as drivers of a culture of safety. Conclusion Trauma patient information was lost during handover from the ED to the ICU for multiple reasons. An interprofessional approach was proposed to improve handover through cross-unit familiarisation and use of communication tools is proposed. Going beyond traditional geographical and temporal boundaries was deemed important for improving patient safety during the ED to ICU handover.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 929-936 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | BMJ Quality and Safety |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2016 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Checklists
- Critical care
- Emergency department
- Hand-off
- Team training
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
Cite this
Lost information during the handover of critically injured trauma patients : A mixed-methods study. / Zakrison, Tanya; Rosenbloom, Brittany; McFarlan, Amanda; Jovicic, Aleksandra; Soklaridis, Sophie; Allen, Casey; Schulman, Carl I; Namias, Nicholas; Rizoli, Sandro.
In: BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol. 25, No. 12, 01.12.2016, p. 929-936.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Lost information during the handover of critically injured trauma patients
T2 - A mixed-methods study
AU - Zakrison, Tanya
AU - Rosenbloom, Brittany
AU - McFarlan, Amanda
AU - Jovicic, Aleksandra
AU - Soklaridis, Sophie
AU - Allen, Casey
AU - Schulman, Carl I
AU - Namias, Nicholas
AU - Rizoli, Sandro
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Background Clinical information may be lost during the transfer of critically injured trauma patients from the emergency department (ED) to the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to investigate the causes and frequency of information discrepancies with handover and to explore solutions to improving information transfer. Methods A mixed-methods research approach was used at our level I trauma centre. Information discrepancies between the ED and the ICU were measured using chart audits. Descriptive, parametric and non-parametric statistics were applied, as appropriate. Six focus groups of 46 ED and ICU nurses and nine individual interviews of trauma team leaders were conducted to explore solutions to improve information transfer using thematic analysis. Results Chart audits demonstrated that injuries were missed in 24% of patients. Clinical information discrepancies occurred in 48% of patients. Patients with these discrepancies were more likely to have unknown medical histories (p<0.001) requiring information rescue (p<0.005). Close to one in three patients with information rescue had a change in clinical management (p<0.01). Participants identified challenges according to their disciplines, with some overlap. Physicians, in contrast to nurses, were perceived as less aware of interdisciplinary stress and their role regarding variability in handover. Standardising handover, increasing non-technical physician training and understanding unit cultures were proposed as solutions, with nurses as drivers of a culture of safety. Conclusion Trauma patient information was lost during handover from the ED to the ICU for multiple reasons. An interprofessional approach was proposed to improve handover through cross-unit familiarisation and use of communication tools is proposed. Going beyond traditional geographical and temporal boundaries was deemed important for improving patient safety during the ED to ICU handover.
AB - Background Clinical information may be lost during the transfer of critically injured trauma patients from the emergency department (ED) to the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to investigate the causes and frequency of information discrepancies with handover and to explore solutions to improving information transfer. Methods A mixed-methods research approach was used at our level I trauma centre. Information discrepancies between the ED and the ICU were measured using chart audits. Descriptive, parametric and non-parametric statistics were applied, as appropriate. Six focus groups of 46 ED and ICU nurses and nine individual interviews of trauma team leaders were conducted to explore solutions to improve information transfer using thematic analysis. Results Chart audits demonstrated that injuries were missed in 24% of patients. Clinical information discrepancies occurred in 48% of patients. Patients with these discrepancies were more likely to have unknown medical histories (p<0.001) requiring information rescue (p<0.005). Close to one in three patients with information rescue had a change in clinical management (p<0.01). Participants identified challenges according to their disciplines, with some overlap. Physicians, in contrast to nurses, were perceived as less aware of interdisciplinary stress and their role regarding variability in handover. Standardising handover, increasing non-technical physician training and understanding unit cultures were proposed as solutions, with nurses as drivers of a culture of safety. Conclusion Trauma patient information was lost during handover from the ED to the ICU for multiple reasons. An interprofessional approach was proposed to improve handover through cross-unit familiarisation and use of communication tools is proposed. Going beyond traditional geographical and temporal boundaries was deemed important for improving patient safety during the ED to ICU handover.
KW - Checklists
KW - Critical care
KW - Emergency department
KW - Hand-off
KW - Team training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85001960804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85001960804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003903
DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003903
M3 - Article
C2 - 26545705
AN - SCOPUS:85001960804
VL - 25
SP - 929
EP - 936
JO - BMJ Quality and Safety
JF - BMJ Quality and Safety
SN - 2044-5415
IS - 12
ER -