Long-term follow-up of a supradescemetic keratoprosthesis in rabbits: An immunofluorescence study

Edgar M. Espana, Ana C. Acosta, Josef Stoiber, Viviana Fernandez, Peggy D. Lamar, Franck L. Villain, Emmanuel Lacombe, Eduardo C Alfonso, Jean-Marie A Parel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the long-term clinical and immunohistological outcome of two different non-penetrating keratoprosthesis (KPro) implanted in non-injured rabbit corneas. Materials and methods: Three rabbits underwent implantation of a pHEMA-MMA 34 synthetic cornea in the supradescemetic space, and PMMA synthetic corneas in the supradescemetic space and within the central stroma. Animals were followed for at least 24 months before euthanasia. Periodic evaluation was performed with slit-lamp examination and photography. At the end of the follow-up, histological examination including hematoxylin eosin staining and immunocharacterization against collagen IV, alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and macrophages was performed. Results: The pHEMA-MMA 34 implant was not extruded, and remained transparent until the end of follow-up. This material did not induce any cell infiltration, corneal scarring or tissue remodeling in the surrounding stroma as shown by immunofluorescence. In contrast, synthetic corneas made of PMMA-induced myofibroblast differentiation, stromal remodeling and macrophage infiltration. This reaction was even more significant in the rabbit with the PMMA implant within the corneal stroma. Conclusion: pHEMA-MMA 34 was clinically biocompatible, and did not induce any inflammatory reaction or scarring when implanted in the supradescemetic space. This material showed more promising biocompatibility results than for PMMA, whether implanted within the central cornea stroma or in the supradescemetic space.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-260
Number of pages8
JournalGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Volume249
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Cornea
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Rabbits
Cicatrix
Macrophages
Corneal Stroma
Euthanasia
Myofibroblasts
Photography
Hematoxylin
Eosine Yellowish-(YS)
Smooth Muscle
Actins
Collagen
Staining and Labeling

Keywords

  • Biomaterials
  • Keratocytes
  • Keratoprosthesis
  • Myofibroblasts
  • Rabbits

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Long-term follow-up of a supradescemetic keratoprosthesis in rabbits : An immunofluorescence study. / Espana, Edgar M.; Acosta, Ana C.; Stoiber, Josef; Fernandez, Viviana; Lamar, Peggy D.; Villain, Franck L.; Lacombe, Emmanuel; Alfonso, Eduardo C; Parel, Jean-Marie A.

In: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Vol. 249, No. 2, 01.02.2011, p. 253-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Espana, Edgar M. ; Acosta, Ana C. ; Stoiber, Josef ; Fernandez, Viviana ; Lamar, Peggy D. ; Villain, Franck L. ; Lacombe, Emmanuel ; Alfonso, Eduardo C ; Parel, Jean-Marie A. / Long-term follow-up of a supradescemetic keratoprosthesis in rabbits : An immunofluorescence study. In: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2011 ; Vol. 249, No. 2. pp. 253-260.
@article{0eaed315a5ac416e9f84ddce11edb97f,
title = "Long-term follow-up of a supradescemetic keratoprosthesis in rabbits: An immunofluorescence study",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the long-term clinical and immunohistological outcome of two different non-penetrating keratoprosthesis (KPro) implanted in non-injured rabbit corneas. Materials and methods: Three rabbits underwent implantation of a pHEMA-MMA 34 synthetic cornea in the supradescemetic space, and PMMA synthetic corneas in the supradescemetic space and within the central stroma. Animals were followed for at least 24 months before euthanasia. Periodic evaluation was performed with slit-lamp examination and photography. At the end of the follow-up, histological examination including hematoxylin eosin staining and immunocharacterization against collagen IV, alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and macrophages was performed. Results: The pHEMA-MMA 34 implant was not extruded, and remained transparent until the end of follow-up. This material did not induce any cell infiltration, corneal scarring or tissue remodeling in the surrounding stroma as shown by immunofluorescence. In contrast, synthetic corneas made of PMMA-induced myofibroblast differentiation, stromal remodeling and macrophage infiltration. This reaction was even more significant in the rabbit with the PMMA implant within the corneal stroma. Conclusion: pHEMA-MMA 34 was clinically biocompatible, and did not induce any inflammatory reaction or scarring when implanted in the supradescemetic space. This material showed more promising biocompatibility results than for PMMA, whether implanted within the central cornea stroma or in the supradescemetic space.",
keywords = "Biomaterials, Keratocytes, Keratoprosthesis, Myofibroblasts, Rabbits",
author = "Espana, {Edgar M.} and Acosta, {Ana C.} and Josef Stoiber and Viviana Fernandez and Lamar, {Peggy D.} and Villain, {Franck L.} and Emmanuel Lacombe and Alfonso, {Eduardo C} and Parel, {Jean-Marie A}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00417-010-1497-4",
language = "English",
volume = "249",
pages = "253--260",
journal = "Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie",
issn = "0065-6100",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term follow-up of a supradescemetic keratoprosthesis in rabbits

T2 - An immunofluorescence study

AU - Espana, Edgar M.

AU - Acosta, Ana C.

AU - Stoiber, Josef

AU - Fernandez, Viviana

AU - Lamar, Peggy D.

AU - Villain, Franck L.

AU - Lacombe, Emmanuel

AU - Alfonso, Eduardo C

AU - Parel, Jean-Marie A

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the long-term clinical and immunohistological outcome of two different non-penetrating keratoprosthesis (KPro) implanted in non-injured rabbit corneas. Materials and methods: Three rabbits underwent implantation of a pHEMA-MMA 34 synthetic cornea in the supradescemetic space, and PMMA synthetic corneas in the supradescemetic space and within the central stroma. Animals were followed for at least 24 months before euthanasia. Periodic evaluation was performed with slit-lamp examination and photography. At the end of the follow-up, histological examination including hematoxylin eosin staining and immunocharacterization against collagen IV, alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and macrophages was performed. Results: The pHEMA-MMA 34 implant was not extruded, and remained transparent until the end of follow-up. This material did not induce any cell infiltration, corneal scarring or tissue remodeling in the surrounding stroma as shown by immunofluorescence. In contrast, synthetic corneas made of PMMA-induced myofibroblast differentiation, stromal remodeling and macrophage infiltration. This reaction was even more significant in the rabbit with the PMMA implant within the corneal stroma. Conclusion: pHEMA-MMA 34 was clinically biocompatible, and did not induce any inflammatory reaction or scarring when implanted in the supradescemetic space. This material showed more promising biocompatibility results than for PMMA, whether implanted within the central cornea stroma or in the supradescemetic space.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the long-term clinical and immunohistological outcome of two different non-penetrating keratoprosthesis (KPro) implanted in non-injured rabbit corneas. Materials and methods: Three rabbits underwent implantation of a pHEMA-MMA 34 synthetic cornea in the supradescemetic space, and PMMA synthetic corneas in the supradescemetic space and within the central stroma. Animals were followed for at least 24 months before euthanasia. Periodic evaluation was performed with slit-lamp examination and photography. At the end of the follow-up, histological examination including hematoxylin eosin staining and immunocharacterization against collagen IV, alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and macrophages was performed. Results: The pHEMA-MMA 34 implant was not extruded, and remained transparent until the end of follow-up. This material did not induce any cell infiltration, corneal scarring or tissue remodeling in the surrounding stroma as shown by immunofluorescence. In contrast, synthetic corneas made of PMMA-induced myofibroblast differentiation, stromal remodeling and macrophage infiltration. This reaction was even more significant in the rabbit with the PMMA implant within the corneal stroma. Conclusion: pHEMA-MMA 34 was clinically biocompatible, and did not induce any inflammatory reaction or scarring when implanted in the supradescemetic space. This material showed more promising biocompatibility results than for PMMA, whether implanted within the central cornea stroma or in the supradescemetic space.

KW - Biomaterials

KW - Keratocytes

KW - Keratoprosthesis

KW - Myofibroblasts

KW - Rabbits

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952447952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952447952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00417-010-1497-4

DO - 10.1007/s00417-010-1497-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 20814695

AN - SCOPUS:79952447952

VL - 249

SP - 253

EP - 260

JO - Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie

JF - Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie

SN - 0065-6100

IS - 2

ER -