Listen up! Processing of intensity change differs for vocal and nonvocal sounds

Annett Schirmer, Elizabeth A Simpson, Nicolas Escoffier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Changes in the intensity of both vocal and nonvocal sounds can be emotionally relevant. However, as only vocal sounds directly reflect communicative intent, intensity change of vocal but not nonvocal sounds is socially relevant. Here we investigated whether a change in sound intensity is processed differently depending on its social relevance. To this end, participants listened passively to a sequence of vocal or nonvocal sounds that contained rare deviants which differed from standards in sound intensity. Concurrently recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed a mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 effect for intensity change. Direction of intensity change was of little importance for vocal stimulus sequences, which recruited enhanced sensory and attentional resources for both loud and soft deviants. In contrast, intensity change in nonvocal sequences recruited more sensory and attentional resources for loud as compared to soft deviants. This was reflected in markedly larger MMN/P300 amplitudes and shorter P300 latencies for the loud as compared to soft nonvocal deviants. Furthermore, while the processing pattern observed for nonvocal sounds was largely comparable between men and women, sex differences for vocal sounds suggest that women were more sensitive to their social relevance. These findings extend previous evidence of sex differences in vocal processing and add to reports of voice specific processing mechanisms by demonstrating that simple acoustic change recruits more processing resources if it is socially relevant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-112
Number of pages10
JournalBrain Research
Volume1176
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 24 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Evoked Potentials
Acoustics
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Empathy
  • Gender
  • MMN
  • P300
  • P3a
  • Prosody

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Listen up! Processing of intensity change differs for vocal and nonvocal sounds. / Schirmer, Annett; Simpson, Elizabeth A; Escoffier, Nicolas.

In: Brain Research, Vol. 1176, No. 1, 24.10.2007, p. 103-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schirmer, Annett ; Simpson, Elizabeth A ; Escoffier, Nicolas. / Listen up! Processing of intensity change differs for vocal and nonvocal sounds. In: Brain Research. 2007 ; Vol. 1176, No. 1. pp. 103-112.
@article{2a8055d15db84cb3b5032d7d08ff1b2a,
title = "Listen up! Processing of intensity change differs for vocal and nonvocal sounds",
abstract = "Changes in the intensity of both vocal and nonvocal sounds can be emotionally relevant. However, as only vocal sounds directly reflect communicative intent, intensity change of vocal but not nonvocal sounds is socially relevant. Here we investigated whether a change in sound intensity is processed differently depending on its social relevance. To this end, participants listened passively to a sequence of vocal or nonvocal sounds that contained rare deviants which differed from standards in sound intensity. Concurrently recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed a mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 effect for intensity change. Direction of intensity change was of little importance for vocal stimulus sequences, which recruited enhanced sensory and attentional resources for both loud and soft deviants. In contrast, intensity change in nonvocal sequences recruited more sensory and attentional resources for loud as compared to soft deviants. This was reflected in markedly larger MMN/P300 amplitudes and shorter P300 latencies for the loud as compared to soft nonvocal deviants. Furthermore, while the processing pattern observed for nonvocal sounds was largely comparable between men and women, sex differences for vocal sounds suggest that women were more sensitive to their social relevance. These findings extend previous evidence of sex differences in vocal processing and add to reports of voice specific processing mechanisms by demonstrating that simple acoustic change recruits more processing resources if it is socially relevant.",
keywords = "Attention, Empathy, Gender, MMN, P300, P3a, Prosody",
author = "Annett Schirmer and Simpson, {Elizabeth A} and Nicolas Escoffier",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1176",
pages = "103--112",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Listen up! Processing of intensity change differs for vocal and nonvocal sounds

AU - Schirmer, Annett

AU - Simpson, Elizabeth A

AU - Escoffier, Nicolas

PY - 2007/10/24

Y1 - 2007/10/24

N2 - Changes in the intensity of both vocal and nonvocal sounds can be emotionally relevant. However, as only vocal sounds directly reflect communicative intent, intensity change of vocal but not nonvocal sounds is socially relevant. Here we investigated whether a change in sound intensity is processed differently depending on its social relevance. To this end, participants listened passively to a sequence of vocal or nonvocal sounds that contained rare deviants which differed from standards in sound intensity. Concurrently recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed a mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 effect for intensity change. Direction of intensity change was of little importance for vocal stimulus sequences, which recruited enhanced sensory and attentional resources for both loud and soft deviants. In contrast, intensity change in nonvocal sequences recruited more sensory and attentional resources for loud as compared to soft deviants. This was reflected in markedly larger MMN/P300 amplitudes and shorter P300 latencies for the loud as compared to soft nonvocal deviants. Furthermore, while the processing pattern observed for nonvocal sounds was largely comparable between men and women, sex differences for vocal sounds suggest that women were more sensitive to their social relevance. These findings extend previous evidence of sex differences in vocal processing and add to reports of voice specific processing mechanisms by demonstrating that simple acoustic change recruits more processing resources if it is socially relevant.

AB - Changes in the intensity of both vocal and nonvocal sounds can be emotionally relevant. However, as only vocal sounds directly reflect communicative intent, intensity change of vocal but not nonvocal sounds is socially relevant. Here we investigated whether a change in sound intensity is processed differently depending on its social relevance. To this end, participants listened passively to a sequence of vocal or nonvocal sounds that contained rare deviants which differed from standards in sound intensity. Concurrently recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed a mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 effect for intensity change. Direction of intensity change was of little importance for vocal stimulus sequences, which recruited enhanced sensory and attentional resources for both loud and soft deviants. In contrast, intensity change in nonvocal sequences recruited more sensory and attentional resources for loud as compared to soft deviants. This was reflected in markedly larger MMN/P300 amplitudes and shorter P300 latencies for the loud as compared to soft nonvocal deviants. Furthermore, while the processing pattern observed for nonvocal sounds was largely comparable between men and women, sex differences for vocal sounds suggest that women were more sensitive to their social relevance. These findings extend previous evidence of sex differences in vocal processing and add to reports of voice specific processing mechanisms by demonstrating that simple acoustic change recruits more processing resources if it is socially relevant.

KW - Attention

KW - Empathy

KW - Gender

KW - MMN

KW - P300

KW - P3a

KW - Prosody

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35148858092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35148858092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.008

M3 - Article

VL - 1176

SP - 103

EP - 112

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

IS - 1

ER -