Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing

Abee L. Boyles, William K Scott, Eden R Martin, Silke Schmidt, Yi Ju Li, Allison Ashley-Koch, Meredyth P. Bass, Mike Schmidt, Margaret A Pericak-Vance, Marcy C. Speer, Elizabeth R. Hauser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Describe the inflation in nonparametric multipoint LOD scores due to inter-marker linkage disequilibrium (LD) across many markers with varied allele frequencies. Method: Using simulated two-generation families with and without parents, we conducted non-parametric multipoint linkage analysis with 2 to 10 markers with minor allele frequencies (MAF) of 0.5 and 0.1. Results: Misspecification of population haplotype frequencies by assuming linkage equilibrium caused inflated multipoint LOD scores due to inter-marker LD when parental genotypes were not included. Inflation increased as more markers in LD were included and decreased as markers in equilibrium were added. When marker allele frequencies were unequal, the r2 measure of LD was a better predictor of inflation than D′. Conclusion: This observation strongly supports the evaluation of LD in multipoint linkage analyses, and further suggests that unaccounted for LD may be suspected when two-point and multipoint linkage analyses show a marked disparity in regions with elevated r2 measures of LD. Given the increasing popularity of high-density genome-wide SNP screens, inter-marker LD should be a concern in future linkage studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-227
Number of pages8
JournalHuman Heredity
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Linkage Disequilibrium
Genotype
Economic Inflation
Gene Frequency
Haplotypes
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Genome
Population

Keywords

  • False positive rate
  • Linkage analysis
  • Linkage disequilibrium
  • Measures of linkage disequilibrium
  • Parameter misspecification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing. / Boyles, Abee L.; Scott, William K; Martin, Eden R; Schmidt, Silke; Li, Yi Ju; Ashley-Koch, Allison; Bass, Meredyth P.; Schmidt, Mike; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A; Speer, Marcy C.; Hauser, Elizabeth R.

In: Human Heredity, Vol. 59, No. 4, 01.08.2005, p. 220-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boyles, Abee L. ; Scott, William K ; Martin, Eden R ; Schmidt, Silke ; Li, Yi Ju ; Ashley-Koch, Allison ; Bass, Meredyth P. ; Schmidt, Mike ; Pericak-Vance, Margaret A ; Speer, Marcy C. ; Hauser, Elizabeth R. / Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing. In: Human Heredity. 2005 ; Vol. 59, No. 4. pp. 220-227.
@article{be7042521a6f4122b4ce342c3bef64ba,
title = "Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing",
abstract = "Objectives: Describe the inflation in nonparametric multipoint LOD scores due to inter-marker linkage disequilibrium (LD) across many markers with varied allele frequencies. Method: Using simulated two-generation families with and without parents, we conducted non-parametric multipoint linkage analysis with 2 to 10 markers with minor allele frequencies (MAF) of 0.5 and 0.1. Results: Misspecification of population haplotype frequencies by assuming linkage equilibrium caused inflated multipoint LOD scores due to inter-marker LD when parental genotypes were not included. Inflation increased as more markers in LD were included and decreased as markers in equilibrium were added. When marker allele frequencies were unequal, the r2 measure of LD was a better predictor of inflation than D′. Conclusion: This observation strongly supports the evaluation of LD in multipoint linkage analyses, and further suggests that unaccounted for LD may be suspected when two-point and multipoint linkage analyses show a marked disparity in regions with elevated r2 measures of LD. Given the increasing popularity of high-density genome-wide SNP screens, inter-marker LD should be a concern in future linkage studies.",
keywords = "False positive rate, Linkage analysis, Linkage disequilibrium, Measures of linkage disequilibrium, Parameter misspecification",
author = "Boyles, {Abee L.} and Scott, {William K} and Martin, {Eden R} and Silke Schmidt and Li, {Yi Ju} and Allison Ashley-Koch and Bass, {Meredyth P.} and Mike Schmidt and Pericak-Vance, {Margaret A} and Speer, {Marcy C.} and Hauser, {Elizabeth R.}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000087122",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "220--227",
journal = "Human Heredity",
issn = "0001-5652",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linkage disequilibrium inflates type I error rates in multipoint linkage analysis when parental genotypes are missing

AU - Boyles, Abee L.

AU - Scott, William K

AU - Martin, Eden R

AU - Schmidt, Silke

AU - Li, Yi Ju

AU - Ashley-Koch, Allison

AU - Bass, Meredyth P.

AU - Schmidt, Mike

AU - Pericak-Vance, Margaret A

AU - Speer, Marcy C.

AU - Hauser, Elizabeth R.

PY - 2005/8/1

Y1 - 2005/8/1

N2 - Objectives: Describe the inflation in nonparametric multipoint LOD scores due to inter-marker linkage disequilibrium (LD) across many markers with varied allele frequencies. Method: Using simulated two-generation families with and without parents, we conducted non-parametric multipoint linkage analysis with 2 to 10 markers with minor allele frequencies (MAF) of 0.5 and 0.1. Results: Misspecification of population haplotype frequencies by assuming linkage equilibrium caused inflated multipoint LOD scores due to inter-marker LD when parental genotypes were not included. Inflation increased as more markers in LD were included and decreased as markers in equilibrium were added. When marker allele frequencies were unequal, the r2 measure of LD was a better predictor of inflation than D′. Conclusion: This observation strongly supports the evaluation of LD in multipoint linkage analyses, and further suggests that unaccounted for LD may be suspected when two-point and multipoint linkage analyses show a marked disparity in regions with elevated r2 measures of LD. Given the increasing popularity of high-density genome-wide SNP screens, inter-marker LD should be a concern in future linkage studies.

AB - Objectives: Describe the inflation in nonparametric multipoint LOD scores due to inter-marker linkage disequilibrium (LD) across many markers with varied allele frequencies. Method: Using simulated two-generation families with and without parents, we conducted non-parametric multipoint linkage analysis with 2 to 10 markers with minor allele frequencies (MAF) of 0.5 and 0.1. Results: Misspecification of population haplotype frequencies by assuming linkage equilibrium caused inflated multipoint LOD scores due to inter-marker LD when parental genotypes were not included. Inflation increased as more markers in LD were included and decreased as markers in equilibrium were added. When marker allele frequencies were unequal, the r2 measure of LD was a better predictor of inflation than D′. Conclusion: This observation strongly supports the evaluation of LD in multipoint linkage analyses, and further suggests that unaccounted for LD may be suspected when two-point and multipoint linkage analyses show a marked disparity in regions with elevated r2 measures of LD. Given the increasing popularity of high-density genome-wide SNP screens, inter-marker LD should be a concern in future linkage studies.

KW - False positive rate

KW - Linkage analysis

KW - Linkage disequilibrium

KW - Measures of linkage disequilibrium

KW - Parameter misspecification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844506823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23844506823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000087122

DO - 10.1159/000087122

M3 - Article

C2 - 16093727

AN - SCOPUS:23844506823

VL - 59

SP - 220

EP - 227

JO - Human Heredity

JF - Human Heredity

SN - 0001-5652

IS - 4

ER -